jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

[Little Bear]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

Noo, I suppose I was wolf'd because I new the most about Kraut? Haha.

Well because I already knew Kraut I tried to convince myself I could trust him, well played!

[Krauthammer]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

You was wolfed because it was either you or emerald had to be wolfed! After all him and you were the ones that seemed the least likely to be lynched.

Nobody seemed to have a serious suspicion on you two.

Maybe Vendetta had another reason, but yeah...what I just said was my own opinion.

As I said before, sometimes wolfing is the wolves' last resort for getting rid of a player.

[Syhto]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

i disagree dance, i would have immediately voted for him because he said oh one person is more human than the other w/e .... total wolf 101

but that's my style good job either way, no one can be blamed for losing this one im proud of yall for playing such a strong game right out the gate ^ _^ next time should be even better

[Gun92]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

I would have liked to play >.> Also, I don't really think there is anything wrong with my play style, but it gets bashed to hell anyways. Some people aren't as intelligent as others so they have to find their own way to play the game and my style works for me and it does produce wins. You remember that one time where I tried to change my game play up and be the aggressive one trying to figure things out? Yeah, I got lynched because I never play that way so it seemed weird to everyone. I like my play style Also, good game wolves...even though I hate you for killing me first

[lumphoboextreme]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

zzzzz. had 2/3 wolves right but missed kraut. gg

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

lumph, next time don't try to convince players that you have a right to only share your suspicions with people you want to because it literally doesn't make any sense to divulge suspicions to a limited number of players if you suspect a player enough to want them dead. I mean, if you suspect someone you're literally saying 'you are a wolf and should die.'

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

like, to me that's absolutely insane. it's like blueballing the thread because you can when you're in a position to fucking give input that could help your team win

[Vendetta21]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

we killed gun92 because of his high post-count, previous experience, contribution to thread pre-game, and relative unknownness. we wanted to get rid of a vocal player off the bat, but not have it springboard meaningful discussion.

we killed emerald because i had a gut sense that emerald would be suspicious of kraut.

we killed little bear to try to incriminate j-rodd.

we killed fiction because the bastard was on to me and i just couldn't deal with that much posting on d2.

and we killed j-rodd because after my 2 day assault on him it was so obvious he was human that there was no reason to kill anyone else.

also, even though these are my reasons, almost every day we magically coalesced on the same person without discussing it first.

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

I didn't expect V to be a wolf and my vote on V nothing but baiting that went wrong

[dAnceguy117]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

i disagree dance, i would have immediately voted for him because he said oh one person is more human than the other w/e .... total wolf 101

ahhhh I see. good catch. I always played based on game mechanics as much as possible, because my intuition failed me 90% of the time xD

zzzzz. had 2/3 wolves right but missed kraut. gg

just to reiterate what Fiction was saying: you ought to make your hunches publicly known. as a regular human, there's absolutely no way of offing a wolf without agreement from many others. there should be no incentive to keep this type of secret. the only reason I can think of would be if you're playing purely to reach the end of the game, which would be a rather selfish play.

[Gun92]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

we killed gun92 because of his high post-count, previous experience, contribution to thread pre-game, and relative unknownness. we wanted to get rid of a vocal player off the bat, but not have it springboard meaningful discussion.

we killed emerald because i had a gut sense that emerald would be suspicious of kraut.

we killed little bear to try to incriminate j-rodd.

we killed fiction because the bastard was on to me and i just couldn't deal with that much posting on d2.

and we killed j-rodd because after my 2 day assault on him it was so obvious he was human that there was no reason to kill anyone else.

also, even though these are my reasons, almost every day we magically coalesced on the same person without discussing it first.

As much as I appreciated all the nice things that were said about me, I think you all gave me a bit too much credit. I'm not really a vocal individual nor am I that great at the game. My play style just suits me and irks everyone else. Like I said, the one time I went to get vocal, I got lynched cause it went against how I normally played the game. Otherwise good job.

[Vendetta21]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Postgame

As much as I appreciated all the nice things that were said about me, I think you all gave me a bit too much credit. I'm not really a vocal individual nor am I that great at the game. My play style just suits me and irks everyone else. Like I said, the one time I went to get vocal, I got lynched cause it went against how I normally played the game. Otherwise good job.

you had one of the higher pre-game votecounts in the two threads. you were the optimal pick for this and other reasons.