TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

[blindreper1179]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Finally caught up. I've got nothing leaning wise. It's all been shit posting mostly. Quite annoying actually.

the xiz/wv thing was weird
sun is acting weird
dbp not calling out being a detective is bad

yup. Good night.

[Gradiant]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Finally caught up. I've got nothing leaning wise. It's all been shit posting mostly. Quite annoying actually.

the xiz/wv thing was weird
sun is acting weird
dbp not calling out being a detective is bad

yup. Good night.

not really liking this. the top two points were the main stuff going on even though you're saying it's mainly shitposting. And then just super vague stuff like 'weird' does nothing to show us that you're involved, especially when things being 'weird' also does nothing in terms of you have any sort of leans. I'd say that's more annoying actually.

[who_cares973]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I'm not sure what you're talking about dbp

[Gradiant]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

hopefully you can decide to make some stuff from all this tomorrow

[Gradiant]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

tbf i'm not really sure your prior annoynace would stop him from making that post bc it seems like he missed the opportunity to bait you specifically with it if he's talking about it like he is

sorry but the way this is worded is confusing me and i have no idea what you're getting at

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

You made a post hoping that other people would notice that it was bad?

I made that post hoping people would ask about it

but nobody did

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

oh well

I still have scumleans on those two

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

dbp not calling out being a detective is bad

is this a real read or are you joking?

[Funnygurl555]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

How is this a red flag? I literally filmed all day today. Fuck off.

what were you filming?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I got bored tonight and made some water, so you get first eyes on this.

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I'm not happy with some of the grain in the top right corner... but at least the refractions / light bounces match up pretty nicely to water normally.

Its related to this game cuz uh... its... sunfans tears. yeah that.

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

oh dang it was bottompaged rip me

[Tps222]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Well I'm caught up now, but god damn is there a lot of shit posting going on, is this what the current meta of TWG is like on day 1? : \ This will be a longer post because it's easier for me to get everything out that way and will probably be how I post for the most part this game.

I'm guessing that people treat day 0/1's now as a crapshoot to lynch almost anyone and then analyze the card flip and review how people interacted with that person?

I'm used to games where the the most productive early game discussion dealt with the role mechanics and what optimal strats were surrounding them, but maybe this format has been played to death so much with the current group that it's not necessary anymore?

What I currently see are a lot of people analyzing current behavior as compared to previous games and established meta of fellow players. I obviously can't use an analysis of how far anyone has strayed from that past meta, so I'm going to go off people who are seizing easy opportunities to call out strange behavior for now.

With that mind, Sunfan calling me out multiple times was weird, but indheart and xiz were the first ones to call him out on that, after his 4th of 5th post doing so. They both posted pretty safe/neutral takes on it initially though, which doesn't really accomplish much in my mind other than just bringing attention to the fact that they're suspicious of Sunfan. That created an opening for Gradiant to submit a counter-opinion, and then there's some back and forth that doesn't accomplish much until it shifts into another subject.

In my mind one of those 3 are likely a wolf then, it just seems like an opportunity for someone to gain townie points without putting themselves at risk. I'll be curious to see how they react here and probably base my vote off of what I see from that.

[Funnygurl555]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

XIZ THAT LOOKS SO COOL

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Well I'm caught up now, but god damn is there a lot of shit posting going on, is this what the current meta of TWG is like on day 1? : \ This will be a longer post because it's easier for me to get everything out that way and will probably be how I post for the most part this game.

I'm guessing that people treat day 0/1's now as a crapshoot to lynch almost anyone and then analyze the card flip and review how people interacted with that person?

I'm used to games where the the most productive early game discussion dealt with the role mechanics and what optimal strats were surrounding them, but maybe this format has been played to death so much with the current group that it's not necessary anymore?

The mechanics thing will occasionally pop up for weird games, but usually we don't spend much time there

for me personally, I find preoccupation with the setup/mechanics scummy since it has historically been used by wolves to give them something to "talk about" that's not actually solving the game.

your assessment is pretty accurate. First lynch is usually a miss, but scumhunting on D0 is still valuable because it sets interactions into motion