PDA

View Full Version : Gaming for the lazy?

GuidoHunter
10-14-2004, 09:49 PM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20041011/tc_usatoday/scientistsgingerlytapintobrainspower&e=2

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
Freak83
10-14-2004, 09:52 PM
Buy me one for christmas.
Tasselfoot
10-14-2004, 09:53 PM
sweet. i want one of those helmets.
DataXUnknown
10-14-2004, 10:01 PM
They are pretty much reaching the impossible now. Just think what it will be like in another million years. We will have everything controlled from our brain. Destroy Earth
QreepyBORIS
10-14-2004, 10:02 PM
That is incredibly cool.

O_O
GuidoHunter
10-14-2004, 10:03 PM
On a serious note, this is an in-fucking-credible scientific achievement. "Science rules", to quote Bill Nye.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
Squeek
10-15-2004, 05:40 AM
The only problem this could bring forth would be extraneous thought patterns ruining your gameplay.

However, response time would be 0.000000000ms as opposed to 0.15ms, which is the norm nowadays. That's really awesome.

~Squeek
deposition
10-15-2004, 10:29 AM
Just think how much we could own SM and FFR if finger strenth wasnt involved.
ImEric12
10-15-2004, 12:49 PM
Within 10 years, I'll never have to move again! :D
GuidoHunter
10-15-2004, 01:49 PM
The only problem this could bring forth would be extraneous thought patterns ruining your gameplay.

~Squeek

Actually, they hook into individual neurons that just do one task (listen to one instrument, to use their analogy), so as long as two synapses aren't crossed, I don't see why other thoughts could affect the game at all.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
Anticrombie0909
10-15-2004, 02:29 PM
THE MATRIX HAS YOU
hydrojakep
10-15-2004, 04:42 PM
Wasnt video games already for the lazy?
deposition
10-15-2004, 04:45 PM
Yes, but it has to keep evolving for the next generations of lazyness.