View Full Version : Rock songs to consider...
Masamax
12-13-2002, 09:38 PM
Just some suggestions for rock songs with good beats:
-Thunderstruck by AC/DC <----Could easily be hardest one in the Rock section :)
-Fuel by Metallica
-Whiskey in the Jar by Metallica
-Iornman by Black Sabbath
-Enter Sandman by Metallica
-Crazy Train by Ozzy
-Smoke on the Water by Deep Purple
-Perry Mason by Ozzy
Those are just ones with damn good beats. I guess if anyone else has suggestions...
Ethereal
12-14-2002, 11:28 AM
If only Eruption by Van Halen had a throughout drum track.. that would make a great one. :D
Stratovarius - Stratosphere would work perfect for a superfast song, though it's roughly 5 minutes long.. I suppose you could always fade it out after 2 or 3 though. Something to consider.
nestlekwik
12-14-2002, 11:51 AM
:?
If I could obtain the rights to the songs to make the files for them I would, but, yeah.
A little story: I know some people who are making a brand new PC dancing game. They are still in development, but the producer went to Sony to talk about licensing. He asked about licensing an Offspring song and few others...Sony wanted over $20,000 PER SONG to cover the royalties...yeah...I don't have that kind a money and I don't think Synth does either.
Masamax
12-14-2002, 12:30 PM
Well, are you guys planning on making a profit off of this?
I have serious doubts how much they would care, and if they did all you would have to do is remove the songs in question if they ever claimed and say you are sorry.
It seems to me this can only be costing money, not making any, and because of that I doubt they will care much.
I don't think it could hurt to use them, and then just go with it. If they contact you about it, just appologize and take them down.
Ethereal
12-14-2002, 12:47 PM
I don't think Synth wants to risk getting in legal trouble because of using copyright tracks without permission. Always better safe than sorry.
Masamax
12-14-2002, 10:40 PM
But damn...their...beats...are...so...good...!
At least use Thundstruck! :D
Synthlight
12-15-2002, 12:10 AM
It is really a difficult decision. Masamax, if I asked you for your real name and address and then posted that all possible legal action would be considered your responsibility and that Konami would hold you accountable, would you be comfortable with that? Sometimes companies don't give a slap on the wrist. Are you willing to take the risk?
I respect Konami and think they have made a wonderful series of arcade games. The last thing I want to do is upset them.
Cheers,
Synthlight
jewpinthethird
12-15-2002, 12:19 AM
Yeah what he said!
MEGAginge
12-15-2002, 09:33 AM
You'll be happy to know that I have coded atleast one of the songs on that list, Masamax - and about copyright, It really isnt to much of an issue I dont think, Of course the rules woud be totaly different if it was a case of distribution, but it is not. Look at the radio, every major radio station in the world (except the shitty news ones) wud b closed if it was an issue to play out live tracks, of course - if the radio stations offered to send their entire playlists to everyone that listens for no apparent reason, this would be different. Worst comes to th worst, the game needs to get cut back and the songs deleted - the only real issue is that the record ndustried may be apprehensive about where the song came from, in which case proof of purchase of the album the song was fom is all thats needed, be it heavy metal or a soundtrack - it wont cost too much to buya single CD to shut them up... I wouldnt worry about it, and as such three rock songs aytleast should be going up soon, thre are a few threads in the main forum about this
Masamax
12-15-2002, 02:42 PM
I wouldn't be comfortable with my name and address up in the public not because that I think they will take action, but because I don't want to be spammed and stuff.
The thing is, in reality, they probably won't give a damn. There are plenty of flash games with unlicensed copyrighted music in them, but I haven't heard of any action against them.
Ussually liscensing would mean a record company would get royalties, perhaps per game sold, but you are not planning on making this commercial as far as I can see, so it's a non-issue.
Synthlight
12-15-2002, 03:00 PM
Web sites by the thousands get shut down everyday on hosts like tripod because of copyright infringements. The only reason you don't hear about them is because CNN would rather report on Dianna's love letters. Just like you don't hear about the thousands of murders that happen each day.
To me, the risk is not very high. I am more worried about konami than I am about other companies. While our intent is good no matter which way you look at it, I don't feel that I am willing to lose this site due to a couple songs/steps. If you would be patient with me and wait around, you will see some spectacular features we have planned for everyone down the road.
It's a good debate.. But I ultimately make the rules and pay for mistakes.
Cheers,
Synthlight
Esparno
12-15-2002, 11:15 PM
But I ultimately make the rules and pay for mistakes.
So true, and we respect all of your decisions because of that truth.
Masamax
12-16-2002, 07:56 PM
I respectfully disagree, but oh well. Peace, and good luck!
Corraiv
01-1-2003, 02:14 PM
Heck, is there a way to check if there is a song that's not on one of those games?
Well...
I suppose you could record covers of songs, or maybe we can just make entirely new ones.. ;)
Synthlight
01-1-2003, 08:34 PM
I am working with a getting rights from a few bands right now. Nestlekwik was going to look into getting rights from a few local bands as well. It is such a temptation to use copyrighted music without asking the authors but I think it is only right.
Argh, temptation sucks the big one..
Cheers,
Synthlight
Chakan2
01-2-2003, 07:58 PM
You'll be happy to know that I have coded atleast one of the songs on that list, Masamax - and about copyright, It really isnt to much of an issue I dont think, Of course the rules woud be totaly different if it was a case of distribution, but it is not. Look at the radio, every major radio station in the world (except the shitty news ones) wud b closed if it was an issue to play out live tracks, of course - if the radio stations offered to send their entire playlists to everyone that listens for no apparent reason, this would be different. Worst comes to th worst, the game needs to get cut back and the songs deleted - the only real issue is that the record ndustried may be apprehensive about where the song came from, in which case proof of purchase of the album the song was fom is all thats needed, be it heavy metal or a soundtrack - it wont cost too much to buya single CD to shut them up... I wouldnt worry about it, and as such three rock songs aytleast should be going up soon, thre are a few threads in the main forum about this
Actually, you're wrong on the radio station issue. They get to play shit free because they make money on advertising. Then they drop 10% of that revenew or something like that back to the recording industries. That's how they get free songs and the rights to play them.
However, most internet broadcasters got screwed in a recent settlement (acutally like 6 months ago or something like that) where they have to pay royalties per song instead of how the radio stations do it. I think FFR would fall under that sort of broadcast license and would screw synth if he used un-licenced stuff.
AznGodFathr
01-13-2003, 04:16 PM
some other artist could be linkin park, Korn, Papa Roach, System of a Down, Sum 41, Slipknot,Mudvayne
Synthlight
01-13-2003, 04:26 PM
Radio stations usually pay for licenses from ASCAP or BMI to get the rights to play music and yes, they pay a percentage of profits + other fees.
Cheers,
Synthlight
DazedZorro
01-14-2003, 03:55 PM
You - Bad Religion. This is good cause you can start the song off fast and then have a nice break. A great song otherwise, I think it would make a good fit. Also, No Cigar - Millencolin. Good song to hear, good song to arrow (or whatever the verb is that means "to add arrows to the beat of a song in relation to FFR". Heh.)
k'tholo
01-14-2003, 06:16 PM
As far as I (and many others) am (are) concerned, who gives a @#%! about the large label names, if you look at it, you'll realize that theres a lot of untapped talent out there thats better than anything that comes out of the large recording labels.
So try to look at FFR as a way to get new bands, individuals, DJ's etc. heard by the majority of internet users. Because this way you're getting a song, and someone else might just get a foot into the door.
jewpinthethird
01-17-2003, 01:24 AM
As far as I (and many others) am (are) concerned, who gives a @#%! about the large label names, if you look at it, you'll realize that theres a lot of untapped talent out there thats better than anything that comes out of the large recording labels.
So try to look at FFR as a way to get new bands, individuals, DJ's etc. heard by the majority of internet users. Because this way you're getting a song, and someone else might just get a foot into the door.
Ding Ding Ding...you are the winnar. I totally agree. I think FFR should help out New Artists and et cetera...and stuff.
Synthlight
01-17-2003, 02:39 AM
and indeed we are doing just that Jewpin. :) Just taking a look at the "top list" will give you an idea of how many people have download the songs of the artists on FFR. I couldn't agree more
I am more than happy to help out new artists and they understand the mutual benefit of such a thing.
Cheers,
Synthlight
nestlekwik
01-17-2003, 09:43 AM
As far as I (and many others) am (are) concerned, who gives a @#%! about the large label names, if you look at it, you'll realize that theres a lot of untapped talent out there thats better than anything that comes out of the large recording labels.
So try to look at FFR as a way to get new bands, individuals, DJ's etc. heard by the majority of internet users. Because this way you're getting a song, and someone else might just get a foot into the door.
Someone finally understands!!!! *confetti flies and balloons rise into the sky*
Is there like a prize for this, Synth?
Keeping FFR original is 3/4 of the fun. However, if all you people want to pay the $10,000+ per song for those big-name artists so we can use them in FFR, be my guest ^_^
Dracoa
01-22-2003, 06:27 PM
As far as I (and many others) am (are) concerned, who gives a @#%! about the large label names, if you look at it, you'll realize that theres a lot of untapped talent out there thats better than anything that comes out of the large recording labels.
So try to look at FFR as a way to get new bands, individuals, DJ's etc. heard by the majority of internet users. Because this way you're getting a song, and someone else might just get a foot into the door.
Personally I'm all for useing independant names. For instance, after doing the only rock stage, I now plan on getting the CellDweller album when it comes out. It's a great song. As much as I'd love to try Metallica songs and such, I think it's time for the new talent to be heard.
smiley
01-26-2003, 12:32 AM
just wondering, but if you were to chop out the lyrics to a song and then miz it up a little bit then is it still infringing on copyright laws? i forget exactly what programs can do it but i know that some can extract just the music and no words and i know you can use stuff like acid 4.0 to mix it a little. i mean then your basicly creating a new song it just seems to sound a lot like the corrosponding copyrighted song. except you would also have to re-name it... just a thought
alextrebek
01-28-2003, 06:47 PM
Personally I'm all for useing independant names. For instance, after doing the only rock stage, I now plan on getting the CellDweller album when it comes out. It's a great song. As much as I'd love to try Metallica songs and such, I think it's time for the new talent to be heard.
I agree. I plan on getting the celldweller album, too (if I have money). New bands are very good things. FFR has helped me hear some music I might not go out of my way to listen to. And now, I do. Thanks, Synth, bprc, and everyone who's involved in some way or another!
SpookG
01-29-2003, 12:26 AM
smiley - If the material you are sampling is copyrighted then you would have to ask permission to use it.
As for extracting music and no words, that is impossible in most formats aside from a dat recording previous to a mixdown. ;)
And as for those unsigned artists, how about more songs by those FGJ! people.. they are so cool (hahaha)
NessTormented
01-29-2003, 08:48 AM
I am make songs and i am have a band, so i could give to some songs. I use fruity loops and in on the band playing for the guitar. Maybe i can even to do vocals, if my english gets to a better of level.
:roll: hmmmm actually I'd like to see most of those... plus NIN, Finger Eleven... and of course... Nirvana :wink:
MudvayneGurl
03-16-2003, 12:32 PM
:lol: I think it would be great if we could use some mudvayne songs. Hey, does anyone know when this is supposed to be coming out? I'm getting tired of the FFR songs we already have. After a while they get easy and stuff. :P
Freak83
03-16-2003, 03:15 PM
Lit!!!
Over my Head
My Own Worst Enemy
Kashell
03-16-2003, 04:14 PM
I don't understand why big names out there won't give you rights to use their songs for free. If anything, it would give them more publicity.
Heck, Why not make a deal with them to put one of their banners at the top of the site or something?
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.