View Full Version : Should Sparkle Downer really be FGO?

yo man im awesome
03-28-2011, 06:14 PM
I managed to only get 25 or so misses and only around 28 misses on Sparkle Downer, which I find astonishing, because I'm incapable of FC'ing even an FMO.

By the way, 25 misses/boos is about the same amount I get for FMO's I don't really play too much, but will play every so often.

03-28-2011, 06:15 PM
Yes, it is.

Just because you have less misses on it than other FGO's doesn't mean it is not a FGO.

It's a low FGO, only reason it is an FGO, is because it's hard to PA.

03-28-2011, 06:17 PM
I would say no its not...But thats just me.

yo man im awesome
03-28-2011, 06:17 PM
Well, I know that, but it seemed so much more simple than the others.

03-28-2011, 06:22 PM
Yes and no. But you have to stick with one rating when a song's straddling the difficulty fence. Can't have both.

A small issue that might be related to this is that there hasn't been any set way of determining whether difficulties should be based off comboing the song, AAAing the song, or just how it plays out.

DossarLX ODI
03-28-2011, 06:25 PM
As long as Lolo is an FGO, Sparkle Downer is going to be an FGO.

Although both deserve to be high FMOs when you compare them to the technical ones like he's a radical rat and such.

03-28-2011, 07:32 PM
No, easy as that.

03-28-2011, 07:55 PM
continue this here.