|
|
#21 | |||
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
Quote:
The only reason why Evolution is considered a theory is because there are no tests that can actually prove Evolution within a human's lifespan. THAT IS THE ONLY REASON. Also, you must take in acoun that there are millions of human traits out there. And everytime someone is born, they are the product of two seperate individuals traits thrown into a melting pot and the result is a human being with 1,000,000,000,000 different combinations of traits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
They are trying I guess. But to see a significant change it takes millions of years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,088
|
Quote:
a parent of bb with blue eyes with a parent of brown eyes, BB and ALL of their children will have BROWN eyes. parent Bb with Bb = 3/4th of their kids have brown BB with Bb = all brown bb with bb(Very rare, would have to have been pure blue-eyed parents since almost as long ago as cavemen) and you can do this with any traits, hair color, everything down to the rate at which your fingernails grow. this is what i mean. Less and less variation as people "mate' more. the gene for blue eyes in humans will be worth a lot of money in the future, as will many other recessive traits that will die with time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
a parent of bb with blue eyes with a parent of brown eyes, BB and ALL of their children will have BROWN eyes. parent Bb with Bb = 3/4th of their kids have brown BB with Bb = all brown bb with bb(Very rare, would have to have been pure blue-eyed parents since almost as long ago as cavemen) and you can do this with any traits, hair color, everything down to the rate at which your fingernails grow. this is what i mean. Less and less variation as people "mate' more. the gene for blue eyes in humans will be worth a lot of money in the future, as will many other recessive traits that will die with time. edit* god, i have to type at 90000wpm to get my message through before it logs me out. that should be changed =/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,069
|
i want to talk. hear your people's ideas, and maybe change the way i think. i dont want to do a search directing me to go to some page that's gonna tell me what to think.
u could pull a google on basically any thread in "critical thinking" and get a good answer.
__________________
-Jamie |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
FFR Player
|
you cant talk about something like that...your question is flawed...recessive genes do not disappear in the general population unless it becomes a severe dissadvantage for the species, but that also would occur with dominant genes...your idea and question, though logical, is completely off-base...this is not an opinion question, the truth and fact were found out by those to guys...they wont rell you what to think, but they do tell you how it is and why it is...so if you wish to continue to be misinformed and if you wish to continue your ignorance by not taking 5 minutes to look up why youre wrong, then thats your business, but dont try to make an arguement out of something that isnt debateable
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
FFR Player
|
what would be the point in asking people what they think when they have no personal experience or research in the matter? anything that they said would basically be what they were taught or their own baseless theory, thus instead of posting something that is thusly worthless, some people may direct you to the source of their knowledge.
if someone on a message board can change your opinion on something that neither they nor you have any practical experience with, then maybe you should change the way you develop opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||||||
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I still exist... |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
You've offered no proof of your wild theories and you did not answer my request. All you retort with is retarded sarcasm. If this is such a fundamental truth, why is it that you can't paraphrase what your source is? why do you stall by saying that you will find sites later? why not just tell us why you believe it? granted, whatever you say will probably be false anyways, but you've offered no support of your point. none at all. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
FFR Player
|
I just have a bunch of random thoughts I put together and don't bother having everything make sense sometimes, sorry.
"Wild" theories? Why did you even call it a theory if you think of it as you do? The answer was that I will find sites, and that is not stalling. But why should I even bother though with people like you here? Edit: Okay, here's some sites. http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld012.htm http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld017.htm http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld018.htm http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld019.htm http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld020.htm http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld022.htm
__________________
I still exist... |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
It says
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
FFR Player
|
You say that science proves that evolution is incorrect and yet you cite a religious site that goes so far as to cite the bible in it's support of why science disproves evolution. Please find a scientifically accredited source next time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,088
|
Just because the recessive gene doesn't show in the creature... doesnt mean its not there... a bb parent also means ALL KIDS WILL HAVE THE RECESSIVE GENE... just show the dominant...
sigh, is it worth the effort to explain? |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Environmentally Friendly
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In transit
Age: 34
Posts: 6,929
|
What's ironic is that nothing in Catholic belief (to which I subscribe) decries evolution.
As for genetics, y'all need to play Metal Gear Solid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 69
|
*shudders* catholic...
Anyway, guest = me... and yes, metal gear had a nice explanation... although not sure of the absolute truth of it |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FFR Player
|
ok, i will attempt to find everything worng with aleco's link
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ok, so they were using the bible as fact, because everything in it is true...so then, by the bible, the earth is how old? well if you remember a while back i made a thread about how old the earth is based on the bible, so i ask you do you believe that this is true? http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...ewtopic&t=7959
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|