|
|
#61 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
There is nothing to show anything is anything, if you bring it to a point where nothing can be proven. Time is the border line between what can be/cannot be accepted through our perception of spacial motion. Space doesn't necessarily have to be 3 dimensions, as you stated. We just label it that way so it's convenient for comprehension. By creating this entity called time, we can explain various other things in our world using our own logistics and mathematics. Without time, none of our force quantity equations would make sense. Time was merely an entity created to fit what we saw as necessary to comprehend the universe. As I have said already so many times, what you term "imagination" is exactly what I'm saying as to how far one can believe one's own perception. No one can prove whether our perception is definite/absolute/true w/e. We have no choice but to rely on such "imagination" to comprehend the universe.
__________________
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here.
Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here! ![]() ![]() つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 30
Posts: 666
|
Without reading every other post, I'm gonna go ahead and throw out my thoughts.
I think time is a Force. A force is anything that gives an object acceleration. While obviously time does not physically move us, it accelerates everything through the phenomena of life. Let's compare it to another force, gravity. Can gravity be seen? Does it exist as a 3 dimensional plane? Can it be quantified in any amount, contained, or measured? Obviously not. But at the same time we know without a doubt gravity does in fact exist, because we can OBSERVE ITS EFFECTS. An object with no acceleration suspended midair eventually hit the ground. This is the phenomena of the force of gravity acting on said object. This happens fast, so gravity is clearly a strong force. So lets look at time now. Can it be seen, quantified, contained, measured? Nope. But we can still OBSERVE THE EFFECTS it has. Any object left over an infinite amount of time on this planet will degrade into nothingness. This is the phenomena of the force of time acting on said object. This happens over many, many years, so time is therefore a much weaker force then something like gravity. To suggest time does not exist is ludacris. Without gravity, nothing would be earthbound and the world would be in complete chaos; much like without time, everything would happen all at once or arguably, nothing would ever happen. These 2 forces, while entirely different, help regulate the world we live in, and create a controlled, logical environment. I did read that page Izzy posted, and while it was very interesting and a very fun concept to consider, it doesn't do it for me. With no time, how does one explain the intelligence of a 6 year old in comparison to that of a 30 year old? Surely something has happened during that 24 year gap; time has occured and its force has taken effect. These are just some thoughts i've had, nothing i feel passionate about or would argue to the death over, so bring on the constructive criticism.
__________________
...starting up again Public AAA #370 - evil approaches Tier Points - 329 (Tier 4) Best Non-AAA - Schmollbluk (rank 26) Worst Non-AAA - AIM Anthem(668) average rank - 109 |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
FFR Player
|
ryan, you should read some of them... but wow. i guess, my idea states that time has an acceleration, velocity, and scalar properties. Time may just as well be one of the fundamental forces of the universe. That's an interesting thought, but all forces derived from the fundamental force have a particle correlating to it. Otherwise, it's not a force. A dimensional force on the other hand, is a different kind of force that has a motion. Hence, a motion through the 3 or 4 dimensions. 3 Spacial forces and 3 Time forces may exist. I believe it's 3 and not 1 for the sake of being able to "stop" and "decelerate" through time. If there was only 1 time dimension, time travel would not be possible because current tech shows that time is affected by the velocity through space. Hence, if we move at the speed of light, time is minimally moving, but nothing faster is possible because light is massless. But, if time had multiple dimensions, this problem could be circumvented.
__________________
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here.
Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here! ![]() ![]() つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`) |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
FFR Player
|
Time is only the result of everything changing around us, including ourselves. Ryan said everything will degrade over time. But on a much different level, everything doesn't actually degrade, it's only changing. Nature (in the down to earth, non-spiritual way) has no judgement towards the value of things. To us it's degrading because it's not as useful/beautiful as it was before, but all in all, it's just a series of cellular or chemical reactions that occur.
In that sense, time is not a common force but merely the combination of process that every single object, animal, human, plant, etc is being put through. What I mean by that is that we observe, for example, the sun moving from east to west, our parents aging, our food decaying, etc. Each of these events is individual, but the human mind will have the tendency to associate all these events together into a single force, thus creating the concept of time. You must learn to dissociate the molecular changes from the conceptual changes. Also, nothing tells you time and gravity and of the same nature.
__________________
Truth lies in loneliness, When hope is long gone by -Blind Guardian, The Soulforged Image removed for size violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Super Member
|
To quote the revered H.G. Wells:
Quote:
![]() Maybe the mass that particle have "slows them down" in time. The Higgs boson is the particle thought to give other particles mass. From the best of my understanding, everything exists in this "Higgs field" and interacts with Higgs bosons which give them some property in the Higgs field that we call mass. Maybe time is a certain "field" and some "time particle" influences others in a way that gives them "duration"? But I'm just rambling at 12:30 in the morning here, just saying whatever comes to mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Sun and Stars
|
Let's think real for a second. Time is universal, thus it happens everywhere, just like gravity. Notice how, Jupiter has a longer year than earth? Its because the objects gravity make it spin slower thus slowing it down.
Since earth is small it spins faster. In my theory, time and gravity are brothers.
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/Br0wnbread ![]() Check out my band profile and give it a like! :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Frau Bow
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 30
Posts: 9,200
|
actually manson jupiter has a longer year because in our concept a year is how long it takes the earth to go around the sun. Gravity is related to the mass of an object which is unrelated to the concept of time.
__________________
Join SMO IRC. irc.rizon.net#smo |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here.
Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here! ![]() ![]() つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Frau Bow
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 30
Posts: 9,200
|
Well i agree with verruckter.
__________________
Join SMO IRC. irc.rizon.net#smo |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
FFR Player
|
I'm not 100% convinced that time is a dimension, but it's definitely not a force.
__________________
Truth lies in loneliness, When hope is long gone by -Blind Guardian, The Soulforged Image removed for size violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Sun and Stars
|
According to scientists, Any object that goes as fast as light, will then start to go back in time. and 15 minutes to that person could be 500 years, to anyone who's not moving that fast. I think that time gets distorted when this happens,
Example: your riding your bike down a path, (at the speed of light) then on another trail, you see a Carrage, (wtf?) you guys are then are about to collide head on, but in reality (you) while moving at the speed of light, to someone else, it would look as you swirved for no reason. THEN a few seconds late the cariage arrive.
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/Br0wnbread ![]() Check out my band profile and give it a like! :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Frau Bow
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 30
Posts: 9,200
|
Well its impossible to get something that has mass to go the speed of light. But the whole back in time this is only in reference from the person who is not going at the speed of light. So they say he will go back in time but that means he would start getting younger or something not disappear.
__________________
Join SMO IRC. irc.rizon.net#smo |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Super Member
|
If you're saying that the speed of light is the point you must cross to start moving backwards in time, then time would get relatively slower and slower, the closer you get to the speed of light. At the exact speed of light, time would stop altogether, well relatively. If one could observe you moving at the speed of light (say, in a train or something) without moving at that speed themselves, then you would appear to be completely motionless inside the moving train. Even though you would experience no change in the passing of time yourslef.
If they saw the train moving faster than the speed of light, then they would see you apparently moving backwards in time. I think. But would you experience moving backwards or still forwards through time? If you sense no change in time yourself all the way up to the speed of light, then you would probably still feel like you're moving forward through time, while the observer sees you moving backward through time. Well I've gone and confused myself again, what do you guys think?
__________________
yeaorwgh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Frau Bow
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 30
Posts: 9,200
|
No that makes sense. You wouldn't feel a change because its all relative. Also i am not sure how that all works out but for some reason i feel like we have it backwards. If you could accelerate mass to the speed of light i think it would age faster. So if you could observe someone going at the speed of light maybe they would just age to death before your eyes but they would still feel like its been 50+ years. Either way noone is going backward or forward in time so it doesnt show anything about time being a dimension that can be manipulated.
__________________
Join SMO IRC. irc.rizon.net#smo |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Super Member
|
No it's not backwards; the faster one moves, the slower they age. If you took a spaceship from earth and traveled at near the speed of light for what you experienced as 10 years, when you returned you would find that the world had experienced 10 thousand years or something like that. If you moved at the speed of light past a still observer, you would see them age and die in an instant, and they would see you completely motionless.
__________________
yeaorwgh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
FFR Player
|
Yep. You're not actually going backwards in time, it's just your own aging that's slowing. I'm not sure if this theory has been proved, though, since a lot of Einstein's work is being questionned atm.
__________________
Truth lies in loneliness, When hope is long gone by -Blind Guardian, The Soulforged Image removed for size violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
FFR Player
|
Spacial motion is relative too. If you saw someone going past you in space, you wouldn't be able to tell if you were the one that was moving, or if the opponent was the one that was moving.
In a more unrealistic (in our terms) analogy, when you move across the room, you can't prove that it's you that's moving, or if the ground beneath you is moving. Perception of time is just as faint as perception of space.
__________________
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here.
Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here! ![]() ![]() つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`) |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9
|
Well, according to Einstein, time is part of space and time can be bent by objects such as planets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
FFR Veteran
|
I think, for think, for those who are talking about mass moving at the speed of light, that you would not be going backwards in time. Let's take the train example. Say there was somebody standing at the train station, looking at the spot where the train would normally pass. If the train is moving at the speed of light, then when the train reaches visible sight, the person would see the train entering the station while the train is actually x feet farther away from that spot, x being the distance from the train to the viewer. The viewer would see things later, as it takes more time for the light to reach their eyes than it takes for the trian to move.
Based on this, let's say you took a spaceship and started moving away from the Earth, faster than the speed of light. if you looked back at Earth and could see people there, it would seem that they are actually moving backwards, as if you're going back through time. But you are really just encountering light that left the Earth that long ago. If you tried to head back, you would not have gone back in time because the light that is leaving the earth would reach you faster, therefore making it seem time is going much faster than it should, until you reach present time. If you left Earth at exactly the speed of light, you would see everything still, because you are traveling with that one image of light exactly. If you left at, let's say, twice the speed of light, and you traveled for one year, you would see the earth exactly one year ago, as traveling this distance (2 light years), took you only one year while it took light, well, 2 years. If you tried to head back at the same speed, it would take 1 year to head back. Now, you would meet the time at which you left earth after traveling for 1/3 years, because having a distance of one year between you and the light, and you moving 2 times the speed of light, yeah, I think you get it. Now, you have to travel another 1 1/3 light-years back to earth. doing so will take you only half of that, which is 2/3 years. so, your entire trip consisted of 2 years total, and guess what? 1 and 1/3 years had already gone by right when you left for that last 2/3 year trip. therefore, 2 years for you, and 2 years for them. Why? Because time is based off light. So far, this probably is not making much sense, and it has already probably been proven wrong by some of you, but I have not read every post here, just a few. I guess I'm just saying that time is based off of light, what we can see. Therefore, really, there is no such thing as "time". It's just light that we base that off of. (I probably contradicted myself in there somewhere, as I'm not good with a steady train of thought. And it's not as much to do with time as it is to do with light, hahaha.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
FFR Player
|
Yeah, somewhere earlier, I said that all of our knowledge is based off our perception. Light entering our eyes is sight, which is perception. Moreover, spacial motion is also percepted through light, hence if time is so illusional, so is space.
Mass can't move at the speed of light anyhow. Photons are massless.
__________________
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here.
Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here! ![]() ![]() つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|