Old 02-17-2004, 11:14 AM   #1
Specforces
Yes
FFR Veteran
 
Specforces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 34
Posts: 5,029
Send a message via AIM to Specforces
Default Class Action Lawsuit, ha, enjoy your .75 cents.

From Reason Magazine:


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class Conflict
When clients serve lawyers
Jacob Sullum

I did not realize I had sued Citibank until I received my latest Visa bill. The statement includes a credit of 73 cents labeled "SCHWARTZ SETTLEMENT REFUND."

It turns out the money is my share of the $18 million that Citibank put up to settle a class action lawsuit arguing that the bank had violated the Truth in Lending Act by counting its customers' payments as late if they arrived after 10 a.m. on the due date. In theory, the 73 cents I got compensates for late fees I should not have been charged.

But Citibank says calculating each customer's overpayment was impractical, so it must have used some sort of guesstimate. In any event, the typical refund was less than a dollar. The lawyers got $9 million, later reduced to a mere $7.2 million.

Since there's nothing obviously fraudulent about requiring payments by 10 a.m. rather than 1 p.m. (the new deadline Citibank agreed to under the settlement), this looks to me like another shakedown in which a company pays off lawyers to avoid the expense and risk of a trial. Even if there was merit to the complaint about Citibank's late fees, it's hard to see the utility in an arrangement that lets lawyers pocket $7.2 million while giving plaintiffs essentially nothing.

That sort of deal is all too common in class action lawsuits. The attorneys who file them can walk away with huge rewards while their ostensible clients get coupons worth a few bucks or checks so small they're not worth cashing.

A few years ago, the Blockbuster video chain settled a class action that accused it of charging inappropriate late fees. Each customer who signed up got free movie rentals and discount coupons worth $18 at most; the lawyers got $9.3 million. In a 2002 settlement of two lawsuits challenging its shipping and handling charges, the Columbia House record club agreed to give each class member a discount voucher for one CD and pay lawyers more than $5 million.

Despite such perverse outcomes, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA) insists there is nothing wrong with class actions that needs fixing. ATLA President David S. Casey Jr. claims a new study shows "the system is working correctly."

Not quite. The study, which appears in the premiere issue of the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, examines fees and client recoveries in 370 class actions recorded in court decisions from 1993 to 2002. "Contrary to popular belief," write the authors, Cornell law professor Theodore Eisenberg and NYU law professor Geoffrey P. Miller, "we find no robust evidence that either recoveries for plaintiffs or fees for their attorneys as a percentage of the class recovery increased."

One weakness of the study is that settlements and fees are more likely to be reported in federal class actions. If, as tort reformers argue, state courts are more prone to excessive settlements, an upward trend might not be apparent in the available data.

Even if inflation-adjusted settlements and fees have not risen on average during the last decade, the total cost of class actions is going up because more are being filed. The number of federal class actions doubled between 1997 and 2002, and Federalist Society surveys of corporations indicate that the number of state class actions also has risen dramatically in recent years.

Another limitation of Eisenberg and Miller's study is that averaging results across states tends to conceal problems with particular jurisdictions. One of the most notorious is Madison County, Illinois, which sees more class actions per capita than any other county in the U.S. and had a record number in 2003. Madison County made news last year with a $10.1 billion award in a tobacco class action, accompanied by lawyers' fees of $1.8 billion.

Eisenberg and Miller found that "the amount of client recovery is overwhelmingly the most important determinant of the attorneys' fee award." That may seem fair, but it's not when damages are absurdly high, or when a settlement is a payoff to make the lawsuit go away rather than appropriate compensation for real injuries. Basing fees on the total "client recovery" is also unreasonable when the settlement is overvalued (as it probably will be when it consists of coupons that might not be used) or when the amount received by each plaintiff is negligible.

I'm not sure whether fee regulation is the right solution, but I thought I might as well put in my 73 cents' worth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The hyperlinks are from the original article.

The main problem, in my view, is that under the current system the costs of filing a lawsuit are far too low, but the dangers of fighting one off are immense. The only cost is the lawyer's time, but the corporations face the potential cost of an award against them, even if the lawsuit is crap; also, the costs involved in fighting a lawsuit off are typically prohibitive even if the corporation can win. It is thus in their best interests to settle, which in turn makes it extremely profitable to file frivolous lawsuits in the first place, because one can often extract wealth from companies while expending little to no effort. The result is massive amounts of rent-seeking behavior on the part of trial lawyers; the losers are not just the corporations, but the shareholders in those corporations and the consumers who now face higher prices.

The author suggests that tort fees should be regulated; check out the final link in the article if you want to check out his argument. The two reforms I personally favor are not allowing a lawyer to file a lawsuit on behalf of someone without his explicit consent (a shocking requirement to be sure) and to force the loser of a case to pay the legal fees of both the defendant and plantiff. This does not impose penalties on the actual filers, because lawyers usually offer to take on cases at no expense in exchange for a huge cut on the settlement or award. Instead, it makes a frivolous lawsuit a far worse proposition for the filing lawyer; the defendant faces no legal charges if he wins and the lawyer faces potentially large charges if he loses. Thus, unless the lawsuit actually has a reasonable probability of success there is no incentive for the defendant to settle, and it is settlements that frivolous lawsuit filers generally are seeking.

This doesn't solve the problem of juries awarding huge sums of money when said awards aren't called for, but it would at least be, in my view, a couple of giant steps in the right direction.

If anyone from Britain (a country where the loser pays the legal fees) could chime in about what the lawsuit situation is actually like over there, I'd appreciate it.
__________________
Check Out My Music
Specforces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 01:41 PM   #2
alainbryden
Seen your member
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
alainbryden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: noitacoL
Age: 33
Posts: 2,873
Send a message via AIM to alainbryden Send a message via MSN to alainbryden Send a message via Yahoo to alainbryden
Default

Stopped reading after the first paragraph. lol. back to ffr
__________________
~NEIGH
alainbryden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 11:49 AM   #3
Specforces
Yes
FFR Veteran
 
Specforces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 34
Posts: 5,029
Send a message via AIM to Specforces
Default

Ha, not many want to read em.
__________________
Check Out My Music
Specforces is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution