|
|
#41 | |
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
Quote:
Actually that definition says nothing of the sort. It says "Things can be sounds that are not able to be heard by humans" That says nothing about sound with no reciever. It says something about sound with no -human- reciever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
The answer is all based on the definition of sound that you use
If you define sound to require a reciever, it makes no sound. Otherwise, it does. Not really much of a debate to be made there. Unless I'm mistaken, it's just two different interpretations of the word "sound", neither of which has any reason to be more correct than the other. I personally think the idea that sound waves have to have a receiver before becoming sound is a rather stupid one, and I'm not sure why anyone would define it that way, but that's just me.
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40
|
Arelik, It should also be taken into consideration that anyone can write on wikipedia, so one is only attaining a definition relative to the individual writing it, rather then as something that has been socially agreed upon.
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
You're not quite right because the sound article is important and has been read by many people, and if something wasn't right or socially agreed upon it would be corrected. The fact that the text I quoted is in the 2nd paragraph and it's the definition of what the whole article is about makes the chances of it being wrong very small. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
But back to the topic, either way the tree has to hit the ground when it falls, producing vibrations - unless it falls in empty space - then we have a different scenario. The sound is there, but the human isn't. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Thats like saying dinosaurs didn't exist just because we weren't around to see them. Humans aren't the center of all happenings and events in the universe...
__________________
"If you want to sex me you have to be good at math!" - Group X "I recoil with dismay and horror at this lamentable plague of functions which do not have derivatives." - Charles Hermite |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 184
|
Do you agree with the above definition or not? It says that vibrations that travel through all forms of matter are sound. If you agree then the tree does make a sound. If you don't then we are using different definitions of sound, like Shashakiro said.
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
FFR Player
|
Actually even other trees have the ability to "recieve", so to say, the sound waves. It has been known that sound waves do affect certain factors in a plants growth meaning that it has the ability to interpret or even feel the vibrations that come with the noise. So unless a tree is floating in non existence and falls onto cement that surrounds it, then the only practical answer is that yes sound is produced even if you take into consideration a receiver.
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
Well, because it reacts to the pressure waves, that doesn't mean it is translating those pressure waves into sound waves. I imagine some kinetic energy is being produced to which things can show a reaction.
I mean, but even then..if the tree can act as a reciever for sound waves, then yes, a tree falling near it makes a sound. Nobody said the original question was supposed to say anything far-reaching about sound. |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Giant Pi Operator
|
As said before, it depends on your definition of "sound." Personally, I think it's a little absurd not to consider the vibrations changing the air's density in a wave pattern a sound unless there is a receiver present.
If a tree falls, why does it stop? Energy caused by the fall is dissipated through heat and sound. There's going to be a certain amount of energy dissipated through heat and a certain amount through sound every time, regardless of who is watching. The tree won't automatically say, "Oh, since no one is around, I think I'll dissipate ALL of my kinetic energy into heat energy, rather than releasing any of it through transmission of a wave in the air. Screw sound this time around." |
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The BG
Age: 33
Posts: 56
|
I think that everyone got a bit too into this question. I mean, if you are around and the tree falls, it makes a sound. Therefore, in the event that you are not there it also has to make a sound - it's not like a tree knows whether or not anyone is around waiting for it to fall. Just because no one is there doesn't mean a sound isn't made - it just means you weren't around to hear it.
If anyone really wants to know - set a camera up and record where you think a tree is going to fall, then watch it and listen. If you thought there wasn't a sound, prepare to feel stupid. Just my 2am thoughts on the deal...
__________________
"They always say time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself."
-Andy Warhol |
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
Obviously not.
Geez, don't you guys no anything. Soundwaves are produced by Jesus Magic...and Jesus only exists where there are people...so therefore no people = no Jesus:: no Jesus=no sound:: no people=no sound. I use the Bible as my one and only source. And to prove the Bible's creditability I cite the Bible itself. |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
FFR Player
|
I like how we got this open to more discussion on the philosophical side, but then it just went right back to the literal.
And Ashley, a sound or video recorder is considered "someone around to hear it". No one is arguing against the physics that tell us that of course a tree would make the same sound regardless of who is there... the debate has two sides, the philosophical one where we question reality, and the literal one where we basically just question what we consider to be "sound".
__________________
♪~ Always Happy! Smile! Hello! I like delicious things I shoot eye beams at the things I hate and make them explode! (Yay!) So Happy! Smile! Hello! It's a picnic every day There's lots of happiness in my pocket So let's play forever~ |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Banned
|
There is nothing critical about this "thinking". Yes it makes a sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | ||
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Banned
|
When a tree falls and you hear it, it makes a sound. Every time. Scientifically, it makes so sense to say that just because the sound isn't heard that a sound won't be made. Sure I can't refute those statements, but logically speaking it seems pretty obvious that a sound occurs.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
FFR Player
|
The tree will make a sound, the atmosphere around it would support the sound, and yea there is a sound but it is meaningless because there is nothing around to care
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: I'm in Kadic, choking slowly on my own hate and sadness
Posts: 13
|
Yes, a tree that falls in a forest makes a sound.
Just like when a wind blows across the artic, one COULD hear it, but there is nobody around to hear it. Now if that tree hits a mime, that's hilarious, and no, then it WON'T make a sound. (Thanks to Gary Larson) |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 551
|
I say it doesn't. For something to be a sound, it has to be heard. If no one hears it, it can't be a sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
FFR Player
|
I like how people read the other posts.
__________________
♪~ Always Happy! Smile! Hello! I like delicious things I shoot eye beams at the things I hate and make them explode! (Yay!) So Happy! Smile! Hello! It's a picnic every day There's lots of happiness in my pocket So let's play forever~ |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|