|
|
#41 |
|
FFR Player
|
Bush= more troops
Iraq= mor bombings FAMILIES= Broken hearts sooo- Bush+troops+Iraq= more deaths to FAMILIES simple
__________________
You suck, I don't. O well.
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
FFR Player
|
Guys, this is Critical Thinking.
Although I don't agree with everything Armadegon says, he atleast types good material.......Well, except his 3rd straight post. Don't multi-post, bud. Raver, the nuclear weapons idea was put to waste ages ago; the only reason our troops are in there now is to bring democracy to Iraq. And the only reason why we're not in nuclear war right now is, like I said before, there are general laws of war that all organized countries must "abide" to. Dwhite, I enjoy your statements, no joke. 2fast4u and Psycho, please post something intelligent. |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Nothing can stop me now..
|
Eh, although I'd LOVE to pin Iraq on Bush, as I don't support him, you can't just say RAWR BUSH PUT US HERE ANGER! Congress had to agree also. =/ We just have a giant war happy government, that's all. I hate to say so.
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
FFR Player
|
True, we are war-happy. But it's still a tough deal. If we just pulled out now, try and make "peace" w/the terrorists, disarm, and try and be all happy, doesn't that leave us open to more terrorist attack?
__________________
Joy is not the absence of sorrow but the presence of God -Nick Bank |
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In constant depression & Insanity
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
2: Sorry about the multi-posting It's just once I submit a post I always read it and realize that I missed a major point I was trying to make so I just create a new post. Srry but I can't realy help it. 3: If we used nuclear weapons the results would be disastrous. I'm not saying we shouldn't defend our nation, Im al for security in the U.S. Iraq and the rest of the world but nuclear warfare would have severe consequences even if we were attacking a country that could not launch an offense against the United States. Think about what would happen if Iran gained nuclear weapons in the next few years. Whoever was running Iran at that point could just say that we bombed their neighbors start some religous rant, Nuke us and then point the finger of blame at us for bombing Iraq.
__________________
Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
2) You don't have to multi-post every time you missed a major point; obviously, since you were able to post multiple times before anyone could respond, you had time to edit that post for the majority of the members to see those "missed points". Multi-posts might be effective, but they're not efficient. Use the edit button. 3) Another good point; well, that, and we get a lot of resources from the Middle East. So...... Nuclear war = Planet flips upside down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
FFR Player
|
I presonally feel like the united states doesn't want to pull out because of the mere fact that it doesn't want to "lose." I say, cut our losses, and leave. It wasn't the right decision to go to war in the first place, largely due to false intel, but still, we need to leave and put this behind us.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
FFR Player
|
let me get one thing straight, the u.s. only does certain things if they get something in return. we could care less about saddeum hussein or the iraqi people, our primarily discrete goal was oil and our military positioning and presence in the middle east. there is much worse violence in africa and we don't even consider going down there because it wouldn't benefit us in anyway except for helping them.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
Again, Bush considered Saddam Hussein (when he launched the campaign) to be an international threat, and decided to intervene. Then excuse came after excuse, and here we are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In constant depression & Insanity
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
Also since I am posting this while listening to an onpoint radio program on nuclear terrorism and loose nuclear material this is a good link if you are trying to understand some comments on posible nuclear retaliation. (On point website)
__________________
Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
Also, the hanging wasn't initiated at all by our government. If they don't want to put their ****ing life on the line then they shouldn't join the military. Have you no clue as to what the mindset of a soldier is trained to be, and what soldiers should and do know before they join the army?
__________________
last.fm |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In constant depression & Insanity
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
and cutting of/ limiting funding could be disastrous and would be seen by voters and not suporting the troops.
__________________
Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Cheesy Potatoes Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity Insanity |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
|
The purpose of the war was to find "weapons on mass destruction", after looking, none were found. Saddam is dead, so there is no point for any more troops to still be in Iraq.
We should be worrying about the country next to it, Iran, which is beginning to create nuclear weapons, the same as North Korea. The only reason why any of us should be over there is for oil, although that's not a very good reason for war, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 272
|
i didnt read the entire thread because i didnt want to hear people flaming bush.
we all know you dont like him i just hate it when people start to get angry when they talk about their views. i see the reasons why you guys dont like bush, i actually dont like him too much either, but some things that people say are just rediculous at times. like president bush not sending help to katrina because of the black people. thats just preposterous. i dont like him, but i like what he stands for. |
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Age: 29
Posts: 504
|
Quote:
I can only think of negative. One positive - anti-terrorism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 272
|
in other words i like how he's a republican.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4
|
Just a quick question guys, how many of you actually believe (excluding A2 Sauce) that we went into Iraq to help the Iraqis escape Saddam's dictatorship? If there are more than 50% of you that believe that, then you are extremely blind and unpenetrating. The only, and I mean ONLY reason we went into Iraq was to neutralize the threat of Saddam ruining our oil rigs. And before many of you object, let me say this, if America, land of the free, was so BIG on helping other countries with their lil' problems, why the flip aren't we down in Africa hmmmm? I dont see a lot of wealthy countries down there, because they're all and I mean ALL basically in a povertial stance. But that's another topic entirely. (Please pm me if you wish to continue this conversation).
Last edited by Admirable; 02-11-2007 at 07:10 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
#60 | ||
|
FFR Player
|
OK, for everyone that's still confused about the whole reason why we're in there, Bush's statement was:
"...to disarm Iraq, and to free its people." Now to pick out particulars. Quote:
Bush might not be the smartest man, and his council might be less intelligent than him (Who's more foolish?), which means that if the COUNCIL suggests something, Bush might follow. Bad blood leads to bad blood. Quote:
And the African situation? My only guess is that many world leaders don't want to get rid of poverty, but get rid of confliction. The military is one of the most funded government organizations in the world; on top of that, you can't do it all. |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|