Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution: Community Forums > General Discussion > Critical Thinking
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Your beliefs?
I am a Theist 9 30.00%
I am an Atheist 14 46.67%
I am Agnostic 7 23.33%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2004, 01:02 AM   #41
CypherToorima
Boss of all bosses
FFR Veteran
 
CypherToorima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Phone Home!
Age: 32
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via AIM to CypherToorima
Default

<3
__________________
I'm a figantic gaggot
CypherToorima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 12:57 PM   #42
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laharl
Have you not noticed that I'm not even arguing your point? You first started to criticize me for being opinionated, so I'm telling you you've been the same way. Follow?
You began your argument stating that "The defenition of God is a perfect being. Perfections can in fact lie in things humans find to be imperfect," without supporting your claim.

Quote:
Omnimax is your definition of perfect, correct? It's what you feel God should be. Why must God meet your expectations of what he SHOULD be if he's already something else?
What is this "something else" that he already is? Yes, my definition of 'God' follows my own criteria, because that is the only logical criteria for a 'God' that I know of. If you disagree with my definition, please give your own.

Quote:
Hence my point entirely. I have a feeling you don't exactly get along with anyone. Love is irrational, but it's one of the most pleasurable feelings on earth. Do you push away that "illogical comfort" as well?
I don’t understand why you feel the need to lower to personal criticism. I happen to have many friends that I get along with exceptionally well, because we all have a good sense of humor. When the topic of religion comes up, we are mature enough to keep the argument civil, so that everyone benefits intellectually, instead of having condescending attitudes towards others with different beliefs. I’d like it to be the same way with you and others at this forum.

If true love is irrational, tell me how. Love shared between two people is different than comfort provided by leaps of faith. If I know that someone else truly loves me for everything that I am, then it is perfectly logical to take comfort in that fact, and in turn do the same for them. Here is a real, substantial person that accepts everything that makes me who I am—I am truly important to someone, and that is reassurance that life is worth living. Making a mark on others is one of the only things I believe to be worthwhile in life; that is one of my personal goals.

Quote:
Maybe the extreme utter loathign I have for people much like yourself isn't coming through at all?

People like you make me tired, to the core, to my very inner soul. Leave those of us that believe alone, please. Just go away and do your own thing. If someone jumps down your throat with their own belifs about a God, feel free to banter and argue with them. At one point in time, religion was a topic that was not to be discussed at FFR because it's a touchy subject.
If you’re implying that I do this to destroy others’ beliefs, you are wrong. I post such things like I did to have an intelligent discussion on something relevant (and prevailing) in our society today. It was not meant to “jump down theists’ throats”—after all, I forced no one to read this.

Quote:
Creating rules for a topic on an open-discussion internet forum unless you're an admin or moderator is foolish.

And I'm glad to have wasted your time. It's been an honor.
I never created rules specific for this topic. I merely stated the general rules for a valid argument. You can find these rules here-- www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html (excuse the atheism references, but the subject matter within is all the same)

If this argument was going somewhere, like it actually almost is now, it would be worth it. Thank you for being straightforward about your thoughts, because it really helps.

Quote:
I was once cabable of having a good, healthy arguement, and then some stuff happened, and my mind isn't quite what it used to be. I am no longer capable of doing much in a friendly manner. It happens when life decides to throw you an unlucky hand when it comes to the chemistry that creates your brain.
I’m sorry to hear that. This argument might possibly be able to go a lot smoother.

Quote:
I never say God Bless in all seriousness. I did it mostly to poke under your skin.
Usually when a person of religious preference gives me a blessing, I take into consideration their standpoint and accept their blessing with an open heart. I understand that it is their way of showing that they care for me as a person. Using that to mock me makes me slightly upset, but I understand that I have been hard on you as well.

~NEO
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 01:06 PM   #43
JesusWaffle
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalReynolds
Oh man, I'll be sure never to use sarcasm on the internet ever again. Just for you.

Mal
That was sarcasm too, right?
__________________
Reality leaves a lot to the imagination.
- John Lennon
JesusWaffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 01:09 PM   #44
flypie743
FFR Player
 
flypie743's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: fairyland
Posts: 3,210
Send a message via AIM to flypie743
Default

Obviously.
__________________

IF YOU ARE THE BOMB YOU WILL CLICK THIS and if you dont, you suck.
flypie743 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 01:10 PM   #45
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalReynolds
I'm not going for civil here; you two are fighting over petty semantics. And I think it's mainly because Laharl can't think of a good arguement contrary to yours, and you can't think of anything else to prove your point. But that's just my take on things.
I agree. I believe that it is the clashing of attitude vs. pride, and I honestly have a lot of pride concerned with my intelligence. It's hard for me to let things go, so I apologize to any I have made uncomfortable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Privateer
I don't want to get into this arguement, but just know, Laharl didn't enter this thread to debate the content of the thread creator's post, but rather his approach to his point, and the post in general.
Thank you. I'm not sure how I was supposed to realize this, but it could have been worded to look more like constructive criticism than an opposing argument. I am open to constructive criticism--that's why I post things such as this. I am not, however, open to condescending criticism, because it is wrong to infer superiority and enforce it withought rightful claim.

To JesusWaffle: Those are interesting theories. I think I might look into those when I get the time.

To Moogy: It is hard for me to catch sarcasm through the internet as well. It is easy for someone to mistake written sarcasm for ignorant claims.
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 02:12 PM   #46
MalReynolds
CHOCK FULL O' NUTRIENTS
FFR Veteran
 
MalReynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: A Denny's Bathroom.
Age: 33
Posts: 6,571
Send a message via AIM to MalReynolds
Default

[sarcasm]No. It wasn't sarcasm.[/sarcasm]

And Laharl, come on, come up with a point to end this arguement about being opinionated. I mean, Jesus-Christ-Bananas, you haven't even addressed the main point of this thread but ONCE and all you're doing is telling other guy he's opinionated. AND HE TELLS YOU THE SAME THING! WHAT?! MADNESS! WHY!?

Mal
__________________
"A new take on the epic fantasy genre... Darkly comic, relatable characters... twisted storyline."

"Readers who prefer tension and romance, Maledictions: The Offering, delivers... As serious YA fiction, I’ll give it five stars out of five. As a novel? Four and a half." - Liz Ellor


My new novel:

Maledictions: The Offering.

Now in Paperback!
MalReynolds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2004, 02:27 PM   #47
JesusWaffle
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default

Sarcasm aside, Mal has a point.
__________________
Reality leaves a lot to the imagination.
- John Lennon
JesusWaffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2004, 01:11 PM   #48
jazzmosis
FFR Player
 
jazzmosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The sunny beaches of Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 521
Send a message via AIM to jazzmosis
Default Re: Definition of 'God'--A Contradiction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonexistent_One
And Jazzmosis--I understand that 'God' is something most of humanity clings to because they need stability or meaning, but that is another topic of discussion. I am only arguing the existense of such a being, not whether it is better for humans to be governed by religions or not.
But what you don't understand here is that it's that people want God to exist - to them, having the sense of stability and control in their life is what makes God exist to them. Since there is no physical description of god, one could find him in any way, shape, or form that they want. God is a concept, and what he offers can be very enticing to some, while to others it is a setback.

What I'm saying is that god or no god, it is the churches that are corrupt. You don't need to go to a church once a week to be an honest person or to be closer to god.. You can theoretically be close to god in any way that you want, since he/she is a concept rather than a proven existence.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurseyRider734
<3 Jazzoo.
jazzmosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2004, 03:49 PM   #49
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

Ok, I understand that, Thank you for pointing that out. Let me clear up, though, that not all people want 'God' to exist. Sorry if you didn't mean it that way, but I try to reduce generalizations, because often times they are unfair to some. I agree that the churches are corrupt--whether they realize it or not. Religions do not corrupt/brainwash people on purpose, it's just something that happens when the only thing you are exposed to as a child is a specific religion (or religion in general). I personally feel that, before becoming exposed to logical thinking and philosophy through the internet, I was brainwashed. I had nothing to compare my belifs to, and I didn't understand all sides and positions. A belief unquestioned is not worth keeping, to alter a historical quote from Socrates.

~NEO
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2004, 01:36 AM   #50
jazzmosis
FFR Player
 
jazzmosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The sunny beaches of Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 521
Send a message via AIM to jazzmosis
Default

I never said "all people". I said "that people". So I never generalized. I've always tried to be as specific as I can when debating.

I think that for most children our age, (born in the 1980's) we were brought up with religion in our life, telling us what is right and wrong in ways that our parents could not. Although I completely disagree with church now and since I gave up on religion years ago, it does set a good standard of moulding a child into a good person. Of course, the church's main goal is to mould them into a person that supports and recruits others to their church, but I won't deny the benifets of church as a young child.

Although from what I remember, some things were pretty brainwashing attempts.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurseyRider734
<3 Jazzoo.
jazzmosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2004, 08:21 PM   #51
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

It does do an O.K. job at instilling morals at a young age, but some kids still don't accept it because it's not "cool" or the accepted way to act in the "cool" groups. I can call to mind many kids at my former gradeschool, at least half of my class, that supposedly believed in God, but I presume that their faith was not strong enough to lead them to good morality as well. People like that make my eyes twitch. They say they have faith in something, but then they act as if they don't. You either believe in something or you don't, there can't be an in-between. I think being in-between, according to the Church, would garuntee you a nice warm seat in Hell. If they belive that, then why aren't they afraid of this happening? It baffles me how incompetent some people are...

Someday, I will figure it out... or at least attempt.

~NEO
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 02:26 PM   #52
pixabee
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
Default

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/3680/merechri.htm

i know some of you might be interested in reading that book i mentioned (mere christianity)
but it's about 175 pages and some may not have time to get through it but i found a webpage
that sort of sumarizes it, but in a very general way-seriously this book is amazing and i'd
recommend it to anyone
pixabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 06:31 PM   #53
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

pixabee, just to let you know, I found the book and have it within my posession. I've read only the first chapter, and some things are still a bit shady, but I have more to read. I am also reading a book about Sigmund Freud simultaneously, so I've got some fun-filled nights ahead of me.

~NEO
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-8-2004, 10:57 PM   #54
pixabee
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
Default

any further in that book?
pixabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-9-2004, 12:02 AM   #55
Kilgamayan
Super Scooter Happy
FFR Simfile Author
 
Kilgamayan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Location, Location.
Age: 36
Posts: 6,584
Send a message via AIM to Kilgamayan
Default

I'm aware this thread just got a decent-sized bump.

That aside, let me try to explain where I think Laharl was going. And watch me do it without going into "omg no logic 4 u" mode, which I've noticed aggravates you a lot. In fact, I'll be taking a logistical standpoint.

You provided a definition of "God", and then went on to show how such a defenition was not possible given several contradictions, and that therefore there was no God. If the definition you provide is, in fact, the correct definition of God, then you are correct, he does not exist. The definition you provided is what you believe is correct, no? Therefore you do not believe it is possible for God to exist.

None of that should come as a surprise to anyone. It all makes sense.

However. What if your definition is flawed somehow? What if you have created extra requirements for God that are not necessary? What if, without all the extra requirements, none of the notes contradictions still exist? Or what if the list of requirements is completely different from what you provided?

Now, if you would, humor me for a moment and read the following while assuming God exists. It's a simple hypothetical situation for you.

Only God knows for sure what the exact requirements for being God are, because he's God. Humans can speculate, and who knows, one of them might guess right. But none of them will ever know for sure.

Think of it another way. I'll borrow Scott Adams for a moment. In the Dilbert world, one of the characters is a garbageman. He is also the smartest man in the world. Adams once said that many people have asked him "If this man is the smartest man in the world, why is he a garbageman?" Adams' response was something along the lines of "Since he's the smartest man in the world, he's smarter than all of us by defention. How, then, can we question his career choice? He obviously knows something we don't."

The two concepts are similar. In God's case, people can conclude things like "In order for good to exist, evil must exist. If God is all-good, how could he have created evil?" But he's God and we're not, so who are we to question why he does something? He obviously knows things we don't.
__________________
I watched clouds awobbly from the floor o' that kayak. Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.
Kilgamayan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-9-2004, 02:05 AM   #56
AniamL
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 27
Default

I've never heard of someone putting the "omnibenevolent" qualifier on God. I've heard God must be omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent, and omnivorous (okay I made that one up), but never omnibenevolent. (Just something I noticed.) But who says that we can't have free will because God knows what we're going to do? I think that's just one of those things that the human brain cannot interpret or understand. I don't think you can just say "if we have a choice then God cannot know the outcome of our choice, Q.E.D." It's kind of like this: "If God's omnipotent, there's one thing he cannot do, and that is becoming more powerful!" That also seems like a contradiction in itself, but I think it's just something the human mind cannot understand.

By the way, I've always liked The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy's quote:


"I REFUSE TO PROVE THAT I EXIST", says God, "FOR PROOF DENIES FAITH, AND WITHOUT FAITH I AM NOTHING. "
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't, QED."

"OH DEAR", says God, "I HADN'T THOUGHT OF THAT", and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

"Oh, that was easy!", says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black equals white and gets killed on the next Zebra crossing.
AniamL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-9-2004, 04:10 PM   #57
Nonexistent_One
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nowhere
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to Nonexistent_One
Default

Thank you, Kilgamayan and AniamL. Your arguments are exactly the responses that I created this topic for. As I clearly stated in my opening post, I wanted to know if my definition was correct/uncorrect, and why. That was all I was looking for. I understand your posts, and thank you for taking the time to present a good argument. The only problem I have is that so many more questions pop up inside my head, but I guess I'll leave that to another post. I don't think we can get any farther in this, because logic and faith just always seem to negate each other.

Such a confusing universe...

~NEO
__________________

Xanga
Nonexistent_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-9-2004, 06:38 PM   #58
AniamL
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 27
Default

Glad to be of service. That made my day for sure.
AniamL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution