|
|
#241 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 988
|
Personally, I don't see the point in doing drugs. The side-effects, even on the safe ones, do not appeal to me at all. The pleasure gained from doing drugs doesn't seem like something I'd want to do. When I think about it, I don't necessarily think it has to be morally wrong, but it is self destructive and some are destructive to others. Even safe drugs are a danger. It may not be immediate or completely physical, but the experience might lead one thing to another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
FFR Simfile Author
|
this is a pretty narrow (and obviously a bit oxymoronic) view, sounds like your prejudices are talking through you. from that position nothing at all is worth doing, because even perfectly harmless things have some capacity through fluke of incident to cause harm.
obviously there's no moral conundrum regarding people doing things to/for themselves, so long as they proceed responsibly and such that no one else is in any danger. while i would never try to persuade someone who wasn't interested in drugs to try them, i've certainly berated enough friends for having all sorts of double standards and generally unhealthy conceptions of drug culture and experience. no, it's not for everybody, and i would never recommend anything especially addictive or health-averse. but on the whole most drugs are fairly innocuous and people should stop sweatin' each other about it Y'AINT MY GADDAMN MOM OKAY
__________________
squirrel--it's whats for dinner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#243 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
EDIT: I personally am just saying that I wouldn't want to alter my consciousness like that, and certainly not in a permanent kind of way that may result in some awkwardness that I can't help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
FFR Veteran
|
Drugs don't destroy people, people destroy themselves. If an addict throws away his life for a drug its the addicts fault, not the drugs.
I am a prime example of my statement. Im a near 4.0 GPA physics major, planning on going to grad school to earn a PhD, and i have a great job now as a calculus tutor. Not only am I an accomplished student with high aspirations, but I have done my share of drugs, and continue to do so. Things I've done countless times Marijuana Percocets/opiates Alcohol Adderall Things I've done occasionally Benzos (Valium/Xanax/Ativan/Klonopin) Ambien Mushrooms Things I've done rarely Ecstacy LSD Salvia Synthetic Cannabinoids (stuff like JWH-018 etc) One-Timers Cocaine Crack 2C-I (Synthetic hallucinogen, most intense shit i have ever done, look it up) Ketamine DXM So yeah, I been around the block a few times so to speak.. but because of my self control that i have, they have not impacted my life, nor my intellegence for that matter, in the least bit. I do not encourage drug use. In fact, I greatly respect straight edge people. All im saying is that drugs don't hurt people, people hurt themselves/others from being stupid and having no self control.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 | |
|
Skware One
|
Quote:
The only problem I see with any drugs is recreational use of drugs that aren't meant to be used recreationally like painkillers and and sort of pills. Also **** any sort of opiate like heroin and you can never control what cocaine is cut with so that is not safe unless you get it directly from the source which doesn't happen. That is my opinion. Feel free to judge me but I am content with the direction of my life and and that is my definition of "happy" so I don't really care what anyone has to say. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 29
Posts: 12,049
|
I've never used any drugs of any sort (also don't drink alcohol) but I've been around plenty of drugged up/drunk people. Surely I've gotten mild second-hand highs from being around my pothead friends, but heh I don't count that.
Despite being a pretty straight-edge guy when it comes to my own substance use, generally I don't mind what people to do their own bodies as long as it doesn't impact others. In all the cases I've been around people using various substances, it was always their choice whether or not to use them and it was my choice to be there or not. Usually I stay around because my friends are funny when they're high, but I know when too much is too much and I should leave. In summary? I think almost everything touted as "bad" for you is only bad in the context of no self-control or a lack of moderation. With some common sense and restraint, the world suddenly has so many more possibilities- it's up to each person to choose carefully what they want to partake in, and how much. Who am I to tell others how to live their lives... if you want to do something, go for it, just don't get me involved unless I want to.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
You guys realise the potential problems you're setting up for yourself posting on a public forum "Here are the illegal things I do" yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
It's Saint Pepsi bitch
|
I find it very unlikely that those posting on here about their supposed involvement with illegal substances are the subject of much legal scrutiny amongst the many many other sites whose main focus is this sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Very Grave Indeed
|
"Korny Drugs" on google, the second result is posts by you, about drugs, on FFR.
We've got plenty of users that use their real name as their username, or use names that would be easily connected to them after say, having their real name looked up on facebook, which managers and HR directors do -all the time- now. Having a post on a publically viewable forum where you say "I use the following drugs A, B and C" is just a potential risk. The odds that anybody ever connects 'SocoNhydro420' with whatever his real name is are pretty slim, but it's still non zero. The name probably appears on his facebook somewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
sunshine and rainbows
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 1,987
|
Kitty:
""Safe" drugs. They're safe in a more physical fitness kind of way, but there are some damaging effects in your psychological state. Some people may not call it "damage" but I consider it damaged, and to say it's not is being in denial. That's my opinion." Falling in love is dangerous in a psychological way too, but I doubt you think that that's a bad thing to do. Someone who's lost their love is also damaged. I also swear I have OD'd on music to the point that my psychological well-being has been affected. Should I avoid listening to music I find incredibly enjoyable, or avoid falling in love? Furthermore, psychological vs physical is not a well-defined line. Your physical brain changes for the psychological things to happen as a cause of drugs. I find it amazing how people out there think that using prescription drugs recreationally is bad, but using street drugs is ok. Reminds me of my roommate in first year: wouldn't take an aspirin for pain because it 'shouldn't be in your body', but yet smoked everyday. Use a little logic. "All im saying is that drugs don't hurt people, people hurt themselves/others from being stupid and having no self control." Then why do you so carefully present a list of 1-of drugs you've done? Surely it's not because those specific ones were too expensive, or because their high was crap compared to other stuff. Last edited by Cavernio; 10-18-2011 at 03:40 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#252 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
What is Life?
|
I was addicted to cocaine and mixed it with benzo's on hundreds of occasions. I did this for 2 years until I realized what i was doing to my liver, and more importantly my brain. Doing drugs for "experimental" use is okay in my opinion. Sure eat some mushrooms, or drop acid ones or twice, but anything more would be considered chasing the high which is also called addiction.
I smoke a lot of pot, and will do so until I feel as if it will cause more harm to me then it does good. People go back and forth on how drugs are "good" or "bad" everyone knows the answer.. Anything you put in your body, whether it's a caffeinated drink like coffee, or a white powdered substance snorted through a dollar bill up the nose (not only talking about cocaine.) can be potentially, if not fatally harmful to you, your body, and more importantly others surrounding you. I agree 100% with hi19, everyone is given one chance in life, and what you do with it is completely up to the individual. When you get others involved however, that's were I draw the line and go from calling one guy a junkie, and another guy just a typical person living their life the way they feel is best in order to satisfy themselves.
__________________
![]() If you like chill music, you might take some liking into: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...eature=viewall |
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Well a lot of people always have the stance that this is okay but this is not. Myself I say it's all okay or none of it is. I know what a hardcore substance problem is like. I'm still paying for it today till good ol uncle Sam lets me off the hook this winter.
If a person like myself that loves pills is not hurting anyone then everyone should stay out of it including the law. Now if I'm high and go rob people to support my habit instead of paying for it myself like I did. It would be okay to bust my ass and send me down the line. As I did not do any of that to support my habit I still disagree with getting in trouble. I would probably not be in trouble at all if a methadone clinic was in a decent range from here. I can't drive 5 hours a day for a dose of methadone 6 days a week for 2 years to build up monthly take home doses. I have a lot of friends that's hooked on harder dope that has to trust the dealer on how strong it is. Then end up with an overdose from a fix that is too strong or get busted then die in jail from a bad detox.This would be avoidable if there was easy access for all. I almost died in east St Louis from a nasty detox in jail a couple of years ago. My respect for the law and the system to "help" people is zero after that. The abuse I put myself through should have never had to go that far if there was easy access for all addicts. If you're still hooked I feel your pain Just take it a day,hour or even a minuet at a time.
__________________
:O |
|
|
|
|
|
#255 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
Drugs are the same way. If you take a drug, you know the consequences; you can research them. If you abuse it, like someone who abuses sexual conduct, then you'll pay a price. But when used in a controlled manner, you can get a satisfying and pleasurable experience. Also, if you abuse perscription medicine, you can't complain that it's hard to get. It's not meant to be consumed recreationally and the government will not approve of it. For something like pot, steps can be made for easy access and lawful use. However, trying to tell people that all drugs should be legal is ridiculous. If you choose to use them, that's fine, I'm not gonna say you can't, but some drugs are illegal for a reason. The government doesn't want you to be addicted to hardcore drugs, they want you to lead a life where you don't have to ****ing go drive for 6 days to get a fix. So try this: drugs are fine and you should use them if you want, but if you think you can justify expose people to a potentially life-threatening addiction like your friend's, you're stupid. The government doesn't want to waste money on fixing up people who are just gonna get their dope on once they let them out. So yeah, pot should probably be legal considering side effects are minimal and it's nonaddictive, but cocaine? When is the last time you saw a functioning cocaine addict who made his way as a functioning member of society? My dad was an addict and sorry, his addiction came first. So maybe I'm biased, but I'll say it: do drugs on your own time and stop complaining about the law and the government. The law and the government don't have to [protect people who aren't smart enough to know they're playing with their life. The government is not your addiction safety net. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
It's Saint Pepsi bitch
|
Whenever I hear someone say legalizing all drugs is a preposterous idea, I say, please refer to portugals drug policy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_policy_of_Portugal
I have done more drugs than almost anyone I know many many times over. In fact, I continue to use hard drugs on occasion to this day. Now, while I mainly smoke pot and indulge in the psychedelics, sometimes I just want to feel that heavy opiate euphoria that something only heroin can provide, and I go about using it as smart and safely as I always have and the good times ensue. Some people just have such an addictive personality that perhaps no hard drug, or any drug for that matter is for them. Punishing the smart drug users like myself because of the people who never tried or never had the opportunity to learn proper drug etiquette, is just unfair. If life liberty and the pursuit of happiness does not include the right to experiment with ones consciousness, then the declaration of independence isn't worth the hemp it's written on. Provide a way for people to learn proper drug usage, dosages, and some form of regulation to prevent people from getting more than they need (like pharmacy's do for pseudoephedrine to prevent people from making meth), and stop trying to control what people put in their bodies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
sunshine and rainbows
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 1,987
|
Umm, the wiki article about portugal's drug policy is hardly an example of 'legalizing' all drugs. Its about decriminalizing personal use of them, but you are still 'sentenced' to try and get off the drugs. Nothing about production and selling of drugs. Furthermore, it also says nothing about not arresting 'smart' drug users. Portugal is just being smart and trying to treat addicts rather than shove them in jail. They are still 'cracking down' on drug users, just in a different way.
On another note, I never hear about people going to jail for possessing a personal amount of weed, or even for keeping a plant in the house. Jay walking is illegal too, but if it's not enforced, it doesn't matter that it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 4,189
|
Poses io. Of marajuna is a criminal offense while jay walking is not. If you get caught wit a personal amount of weed, there's a good chance they'll just throw your shit out or tell you to move, but there's also still a very good chance you have to go to court, go in for finger prints, and get diversion and do community service. It's not as relaxed as you think it is. It've done community service for it and put in front of a judge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 | |
|
It's Saint Pepsi bitch
|
Quote:
Now your second paragraph just screams naivety. Where I live, people are left and right being locked up for possession of the most minute amounts. Nearly a million people a year are locked up for possession of marijuana. It's a Class B misdemeanor. You will go to jail for being found in possession no ifs ands or buts about it. I can't remember the last time I've heard it going the other way around. And keeping a plant in your house? Are you kidding me? That's a felony bud. Where I live we are talking prison time; not wait until you get your court date within the county jail and get put on probation time. Marijuana is still scheduled like heroin meaning, the government who has been asked repeatedly to reduce the scheduling severity, still continues to see marijuana as a drug on the same caliber of danger, and possessing no beneficial attributes. Hmm. Seems to me like a blatant refusal to look into some of the most alleviating properties in existence. We are talking about something like cannabidiol, a cannabinoid found within pot and major constituent of the herb, that is one of the most powerful anti-oxidants, anti-inflammatory and anti-auto immune response compounds that there is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 4,189
|
It's viewed as the most mild criminal drug with the most mild consequences in Canada. Having 3+ plants in your house is soon going to get you ****ed with the new bill being passed however I heard it's going to lighten up on possession but don't quote me on that. You'll still get ****ed if they catch you twice though and decide to act upon it both times which again, IS NOT UNCOMMON!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|