Holy wut it is Eva.

[evanescence_death4ever]

I do indeed love what this thread has become. Also, hi rushy!! (^.~)/

[-JiZ53-]

Originally Posted by rushyrulz

There's actually a 300-page proof of this, most of which is spent defining 1, 2, +, and = rigorously.

Please link it cause Wittgenstein pretty much showed that it cannot be proven because it all rests on assumption(I'm paraphrasing)

[Wayward Vagabond]

Who@

[evanescence_death4ever]

i should sing a math song...

[llyair]

omg you can't mention math songs without Finite Simple Group of Order Two! (just had to say that) <3

Finite Simple Group (of Order Two):

The path of love is never smooth
But mine's continuous for you
You're the upper bound in the chains of my heart
You're my Axiom of Choice, you know it's true

But lately our relation's not so well-defined
And I just can't function without you
I'll prove my proposition and I'm sure you'll find
We're a finite simple group of order two

I'm losing my identity
I'm getting tensor every day
And without loss of generality
I will assume that you feel the same way

Since every time I see you, you just quotient out
The faithful image that I map into
But when we're one-to-one you'll see what I'm about
'Cause we're a finite simple group of order two

Our equivalence was stable,
A principal love bundle sitting deep inside
But then you drove a wedge between our two-forms
Now everything is so complexified

When we first met, we simply connected
My heart was open but too dense
Our system was already directed
To have a finite limit, in some sense

I'm living in the kernel of a rank-one map
From my domain, its image looks so blue,
'Cause all I see are zeroes, it's a cruel trap
But we're a finite simple group of order two

I'm not the smoothest operator in my class,
But we're a mirror pair, me and you,
So let's apply forgetful functors to the past
And be a finite simple group, a finite simple group,
Let's be a finite simple group of order two
(Oughter: "Why not three?")

I've proved my proposition now, as you can see,
So let's both be associative and free
And by corollary, this shows you and I to be
Purely inseparable. Q. E. D.

[r]

hi r emember me?

[choof]

Originally Posted by -JiZ53-

Please link it cause Wittgenstein pretty much showed that it cannot be proven because it all rests on assumption(I'm paraphrasing)

pseudo-intellectual jiz post #153 + TGB post count

[-JiZ53-]

Originally Posted by choof

pseudo-intellectual jiz post #153 + TGB post count

If you want to hear about any other philosophers that you've never heard of just send me a pm. I love talking about things I've learned.

[-JiZ53-]

I may have confused some of my ideas though. Godel is also related to what I am talking about... all these guys came from the same time/ genereal area, and all their ideas are related to each other, but I'm no expert on mathmatics, I prefer real things. I was just pointing out that math is pretty much fake and stupid and half of it isn't even proven( I'm paraphrasing here)

[MarioNintendo]

"I'm paraphrasing"
- -JiZ53- 2016

[flashpantss]

A knife and some windex. Classic

[evanescence_death4ever]

Originally Posted by flashpantss

A knife and some windex. Classic

This post makes me so happy. Glad for no cinnamon. (^_~)/

[flashpantss]

Originally Posted by evanescence_death4ever

This post makes me so happy. Glad for no cinnamon. (^_~)/

I remember everything. You're nothing short of amazing milady.

[Evascythe]

Originally Posted by _Zenith_

Came in here thinking it was Evascythe... but welcome back

yeah I thought it was me too when I saw this thread title under the recent posts section D:

[flashpantss]

Shes the best NA

[evanescence_death4ever]

https://youtu.be/ao6KjkyATFg
I attempted to play the guitar also, this time.

[hi19hi19]

A bit late to reply to the old discussion but here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principia_Mathematica

is the work by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell that includes a proof that 1+1=2 using symbolic logic. It's a fun read, if you like this kind of thing.

Also, contrast with: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B...eness_theorems
since the people talking earlier in the thread seem to be interested in some of the properties of mathematics such as internal consistency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert's_second_problem) that are relevant to mathematical philosophy.

[MixMasterLar]

Just commenting that the vid was good and welcome back.


......you guys can carry on with whatever you're talking about

[rushyrulz]

Originally Posted by -JiZ53-

Please link it cause Wittgenstein pretty much showed that it cannot be proven because it all rests on assumption(I'm paraphrasing)

If you actually read this whole thing...
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/u/umhistma...100;view=image

Originally Posted by evanescence_death4ever

hi rushy!! (^.~)/

hello

[evanescence_death4ever]

https://youtu.be/4N3NjYWHfqs

I did a sailor moon thing...