10-14-2013, 07:18 PM | #61 | |
no
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 33
Posts: 1,850
|
Re: Turbo (87 or ???)
Quote:
the existing ones were systematically disproved and the only thing that took their place was bullshit non sequiturs |
|
10-14-2013, 07:21 PM | #62 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 32
Posts: 606
|
Re: Turbo (87 or ???)
Why are you so salty? Not to mention biased.
|
10-14-2013, 07:23 PM | #63 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,949
|
Re: Turbo (87 or ???)
if you have bring words like 'salty' and 'fuck' into a discussion about rating online rhythm game files you're doing it wrong
|
10-14-2013, 07:23 PM | #64 |
Anime Avatars ( ◜◡^)っ✂╰⋃╯
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Squat Rack
Age: 34
Posts: 10,837
|
Re: Turbo (87 or ???)
Ji and SK8R just stop directing posts at each other altogether on the forums because nothing productive ever comes from it.
Statistically speaking, it's not an 87. Yes, this can be inferred despite the file only being out for a week. 85 seems like a good fit (and even then it's a point higher than where I'd like to put it). I'm just gonna go ahead and make the change/close this thread right now because I don't think there are any valid points to keep this locked in at 87 after looking at current stats (which will only improve with time given several top tier players that haven't played the file yet or given an honest effort), plus the thread's already been derailed. 85 it is. |
10-14-2013, 07:24 PM | #65 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Turbo (87 or ???)
Hey, lets not start virtually grabbing each other!
Lets just agree that people disagree that it should be bumped lower. I still disagree with some of the difficulties, but that's because of my own bias feels and weak skill sets I have, lol. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|