TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Microsoft]

i don't expect a lot of people to trust that read, but if you do i want everyone to come to a consensus. who do we want dead more: the wolf or the acq

[Starbucks]

Originally Posted by Microsoft

i don't expect a lot of people to trust that read, but if you do i want everyone to come to a consensus. who do we want dead more: the wolf or the acq

wolf imo

[Wells Fargo]

we want the wolf dead
its really hard for the acquisitioner to win if all wolves are dead, I posted why this morning, I think.

[Wells Fargo]

that being said, you might be onto something Microsoft.

[Starbucks]

I think I can pretty easily establish my identity D0 using my hate-boner for IBM

Originally Posted by Starbucks

IBM

You suck and Watson can suck my hairy fucking nutsack

Originally Posted by Starbucks

IBM, I want you to know that your analytics-as-a-service program is cheez-whiz and your customer support reminds me of Walmart's stanky armpit hair

I have been using IBM's Bluemix / Watson service for research and it is the shittiest thing ever

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Starbucks

I think I can pretty easily establish my identity D0 using my hate-boner for IBM





I have been using IBM's Bluemix / Watson service for research and it is the shittiest thing ever

Ok, I should've picked up on that.
I guess I'll look for something on my end, but I really was trying to not be myself because I was mistaken about how the acquisitioner worked.

[McDonalds]

Originally Posted by Microsoft

and if she flips town i will lynch myself the next fucking day because there has never been a day where the two of us roll town together

yeah this worries me a too it's hard to believe that we're on the same team ever so

[Starbucks]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Ok, I should've picked up on that.
I guess I'll look for something on my end, but I really was trying to not be myself because I was mistaken about how the acquisitioner worked.

try your best, I remember your early misconception about how the acquisitioner worked

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Ok, I should've picked up on that.
I guess I'll look for something on my end, but I really was trying to not be myself because I was mistaken about how the acquisitioner worked.

I might not be able to do this tonight actually.

[Facebook]

i think the acquisitioner would probably go for the deal breaker or blocker first since they can hurt the acquisitioner directly. based on how long the acquisitioner has been in the game i think they would ignore the vigi since the wolves would probably go for them first. since its only the godfather left this makes more sense. this is assuming they moved n2 and tried to move again n3. this lines up with ge being the last acquisitioner spot and explains why there wasnt a kill last night.

if ge was the old acquisitioner i think we need to identity check ibm if we havent. i havent been paying much attention to this. shell seems legit since he hasnt changed at all since the beginning of the game. ibm blocked me last night but they could have been taken over.

if the acquisitioner is camping in someone since n1 i dont think its alibaba like i said earlier. angleshoot i know. starbucks looks clean based off of his most recent post but i dont know the other players enough to make a good call.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Ironically, I think I know who you are from this post.

fwiw I was wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong here

[Alibaba Group]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Alibaba there's no way to check.

I mean like, at this point hammering it home is probably unnecessary, but it bothers me intensely, especially because I'm pretty sure it's not true.

Like this is actually bothering me completely context-independent and I'm not sure why.

Originally Posted by Microsoft

i don't expect a lot of people to trust that read, but if you do i want everyone to come to a consensus. who do we want dead more: the wolf or the acq

Definitely wolf, acq basically can't win an open game ever.

Like, if you just had a setup of acq and greens acq loses every time. Acq would be in a worse than terrible spot with as much knowledge is around now at this point.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Nah, I know for sure now.

The change you've made is noticeable, but even breaking out a dusty thesaurus instead of a brand new one won't change anything.

You guys are pretty lucky I'm not the whatever its called, I'd wipe the floor with you fools.

Keyword was thesaurus, not that that gives a hint to anyone.

The last line I guess shows a bit of my cockiness, coming off of Undertale where I had I think 13/17 identities right or something, I was hoping to roll acquisitioner.

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Facebook

i think the acquisitioner would probably go for the deal breaker or blocker first since they can hurt the acquisitioner directly. based on how long the acquisitioner has been in the game i think they would ignore the vigi since the wolves would probably go for them first. since its only the godfather left this makes more sense. this is assuming they moved n2 and tried to move again n3. this lines up with ge being the last acquisitioner spot and explains why there wasnt a kill last night.

if ge was the old acquisitioner i think we need to identity check ibm if we havent. i havent been paying much attention to this. shell seems legit since he hasnt changed at all since the beginning of the game. ibm blocked me last night but they could have been taken over.

if the acquisitioner is camping in someone since n1 i dont think its alibaba like i said earlier. angleshoot i know. starbucks looks clean based off of his most recent post but i dont know the other players enough to make a good call.

Wanna know why they won't even acquire me?



THEY CAN'T REPLICATE WHO I AM NO MATTER HOW HARD THEY TRY, SQUAWK SQUAWK, SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Maybe I was wrong.

I shouldn't be focused on this anyway.

Ok, this is a little promising actually. I was worried about this because I didn't want to give away someone's identity to the acquisitioner because I thought that's what the acquisitioner needed to acquire people.

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

I was hoping to roll acquisitioner.

And see you fail to impersonate me?



PFFFFFFFFFFTTTTT

I would LOVE to see that!

[Microsoft]

Originally Posted by Shell

archen

bird up

[Shell]

I'm hyper right now, is it noticeable?

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Its guaranteed not the only way that town can kill wolves, GE.

This isn't really important, I just think its funny I told our vigi that there were more ways to kill wolves than lynching them in this game.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Its guaranteed not the only way that town can kill wolves, GE.

I do think that UPS has rand>town going for him, but Idc very much about that.

Sorry I'm rubbing you the wrong way.

Disclaimer: I'm not sorry.

Its a negligent lynch either way, because its d0. Were it any other day, I'd probably vomit at the thought of killing an inactive just because they are inactive, but lmao, 20 person game.

Its getting to the last hour, no one has done anything, The average posts per player is probably slightly over 20 if I did the mental math right, this lynch is going to suck horse cock no matter what.

Might as well cut out the cancer now.

Actually, this post is kinda in my language now that I look at it.

rand>x, "Idc", "Disclaimer:"