THE BATTLE OF THE BRAIN!!!!!!!!

bballplaya · 12-13-2003, 02:05 PM

Post your thoughts on the testing on animals for potentially harmful products.

scorpio1690 · 12-13-2003, 02:06 PM

I think that if they can spend enough money to get the rights to test the dangerous products on animals that they should fucking build a computer that you can test them on.

**Freak83** · 12-13-2003, 02:08 PM

Would you rather test it on humans? I saw a report on this back in grade 8, they said that they hardly ever test on dogs or cats if anyone can feel better about that. But particually harmful products do have their uses and it needs to be tested. It may seem cruel but if it's not done to animals it would be done to people, perhaps you.

Lupin_the_3rd · 12-13-2003, 02:08 PM

speaking of testing on animals, did you know that the majority of first aid came from testing on Jews by the nazis (for example: what temp does skin burn, how to treat it, all kinds of shit)

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:08 PM

i think they should test the products on criminals

it'd be all "I wonder if this horribly dangerous bomb works"

"lets test it on the democrats!"

Anticrombie0909 · 12-13-2003, 02:12 PM

True Lupin. I read a story of a woman who had a baby, and the 'doctor' there instructed a guard to watch her, and make sure she didn't feed it at all. He wanted to see how long a newborn baby would last without any food. In a strange show of caring however, the guard turned away after two days and let the woman smother the baby so it wouldn't suffer. Kinda sad, really.

And about the animal testing thing...it would depend on what animals they were testing, and if it was harmful or not. I mean, if they're testing how many shotgun blasts a chimp can take, obviously no. I even feel its wrong to test lipsticks and such on animals, which they like to do. But if its for medical or serious purposes...for instance, doctors just recently discovered how to extract a gene that allows the backbone to heal if snapped. They broke rat's backs, gave them a vaccine, set the bone and the rats were able to walk again. Studies like that, ones for the common good of people, I feel are okay.

jewpinthethird · 12-13-2003, 02:13 PM

I too agree that it should be tested on criminals. But not democrats.

But the problem is the whole "cruel and unusually punishment jazz".

Lupin_the_3rd · 12-13-2003, 02:14 PM

we should do tests on stupid people...because they are so stupid, any effect from the product will make them like smarter or something

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewpinthethird

I too agree that it should be tested on criminals. But not democrats.

But the problem is the whole "cruel and unusually punishment jazz".

yeah I was kidding about the democrats

and cruel and unusual punishment my ass

plus....it would set an example

You do the crime.....you get products tested on you

*insert catchy slogan here*

Anticrombie0909 · 12-13-2003, 02:18 PM

God, I write out something thoughtful and you're talking about nuking democrats...well, I can play that game.

derr...I like cookies.

bballplaya · 12-13-2003, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anticrombie0909

True Lupin. I read a story of a woman who had a baby, and the 'doctor' there instructed a guard to watch her, and make sure she didn't feed it at all. He wanted to see how long a newborn baby would last without any food. In a strange show of caring however, the guard turned away after two days and let the woman smother the baby so it wouldn't suffer. Kinda sad, really.

And about the animal testing thing...it would depend on what animals they were testing, and if it was harmful or not. I mean, if they're testing how many shotgun blasts a chimp can take, obviously no. I even feel its wrong to test lipsticks and such on animals, which they like to do. But if its for medical or serious purposes...for instance, doctors just recently discovered how to extract a gene that allows the backbone to heal if snapped. They broke rat's backs, gave them a vaccine, set the bone and the rats were able to walk again. Studies like that, ones for the common good of people, I feel are okay.

I agree with that.

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:24 PM

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I styill think we should test it on humans

bballplaya · 12-13-2003, 02:27 PM

LMFAO!!!!!

Anticrombie0909 · 12-13-2003, 02:27 PM

Bahahaha stupid Clinton.

And what the hell does Yogurt have to do with anything?

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:28 PM

nothing its just..........random yogurt

lets not get off topic now....*smirk*

bballplaya · 12-13-2003, 02:29 PM

OK Why not test them on incurable people with fatal diseases??

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:30 PM

because.....if you test like medicine on them they are already to weak to react to it....or they might have some bodily deformities

bballplaya · 12-13-2003, 02:32 PM

true true hmmm why not alternateoblivion then????

Anticrombie0909 · 12-13-2003, 02:33 PM

Quote:

OK Why not test them on incurable people with fatal diseases??

Because, like Bean said, they might have side effects due to the disease. But beyond that, some people do. For instance, say a kid is dying with AIDS. His parents might decide to try some experimental new treatment that may have potential side effects, but since he's going to die anyway it doesn't matter, and they get hope that he might live. So sometimes that works.

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 12-13-2003, 02:34 PM

No...lets test everything on him

and back to the abnormality thing.....people with diseases like that may die more easily as a result of a product.......normal people might survive and be fine

12-13-2003, 02:06 PM	#2
scorpio1690 FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: canada eh? Age: 33 Posts: 4,817	I think that if they can spend enough money to get the rights to test the dangerous products on animals that they should fucking build a computer that you can test them on.

12-13-2003, 02:08 PM	#3
Freak83 FFR Simfile Author Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 3,281	Would you rather test it on humans? I saw a report on this back in grade 8, they said that they hardly ever test on dogs or cats if anyone can feel better about that. But particually harmful products do have their uses and it needs to be tested. It may seem cruel but if it's not done to animals it would be done to people, perhaps you.

12-13-2003, 02:08 PM	#4
Lupin_the_3rd FFR Player Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 2,665	speaking of testing on animals, did you know that the majority of first aid came from testing on Jews by the nazis (for example: what temp does skin burn, how to treat it, all kinds of shit)

12-13-2003, 02:08 PM	#5
IAMTHEEVILBEAN FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,078	i think they should test the products on criminals it'd be all "I wonder if this horribly dangerous bomb works" "lets test it on the democrats!"

12-13-2003, 02:12 PM	#6
Anticrombie0909 FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,683	True Lupin. I read a story of a woman who had a baby, and the 'doctor' there instructed a guard to watch her, and make sure she didn't feed it at all. He wanted to see how long a newborn baby would last without any food. In a strange show of caring however, the guard turned away after two days and let the woman smother the baby so it wouldn't suffer. Kinda sad, really. And about the animal testing thing...it would depend on what animals they were testing, and if it was harmful or not. I mean, if they're testing how many shotgun blasts a chimp can take, obviously no. I even feel its wrong to test lipsticks and such on animals, which they like to do. But if its for medical or serious purposes...for instance, doctors just recently discovered how to extract a gene that allows the backbone to heal if snapped. They broke rat's backs, gave them a vaccine, set the bone and the rats were able to walk again. Studies like that, ones for the common good of people, I feel are okay.

12-13-2003, 02:13 PM	#7
jewpinthethird (The Fat's Sabobah) Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Palm Springs, California Posts: 11,711	I too agree that it should be tested on criminals. But not democrats. But the problem is the whole "cruel and unusually punishment jazz".

12-13-2003, 02:14 PM	#8
Lupin_the_3rd FFR Player Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 2,665	we should do tests on stupid people...because they are so stupid, any effect from the product will make them like smarter or something

12-13-2003, 02:18 PM	#10
Anticrombie0909 FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,683	God, I write out something thoughtful and you're talking about nuking democrats...well, I can play that game. derr...I like cookies.

12-13-2003, 02:27 PM	#14
Anticrombie0909 FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,683	Bahahaha stupid Clinton. And what the hell does Yogurt have to do with anything?

12-13-2003, 02:28 PM	#15
IAMTHEEVILBEAN FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,078	nothing its just..........random yogurt lets not get off topic now....smirk

12-13-2003, 02:30 PM	#17
IAMTHEEVILBEAN FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,078	because.....if you test like medicine on them they are already to weak to react to it....or they might have some bodily deformities

12-13-2003, 02:34 PM	#20
IAMTHEEVILBEAN FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,078	No...lets test everything on him and back to the abnormality thing.....people with diseases like that may die more easily as a result of a product.......normal people might survive and be fine

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)