TWG Penalty Thread

[XelNya]

Originally Posted by Xiz

Threatening to break games regardless of your situation to win is unethical.
Not playing games because someone is in it is immature.
Being Charu is snivy.

In situations like this, my thoughts when creating this was to give 2 infractions. If he has done this in the past, then add 2 more, which is perma.

Also hi, just moved to Seattle. I get internet next Friday. I might be playing soon. Or might not.

PLZ COME BACK.

PLZ PLZ PLZ.

[Charu]

Oh my god, Red Blaster.

Look, I don't know why when people start calling you out you get all defensive and sprout that you're done with this website or whatever and other shenanigans.

That just leaves a bad taste and no one likes a bad taste. Yuck

So just... calm down, think about why threatening with a PM is bad in TWG (Even if it's a joke as you claim...) and all will be good.

Okay?

Okay.

Now give me a hug!

[Jub3r7]

My opinion is that he shouldn't be permabanned for it this time around. If actually posting his role pm is 2 infractions, then threatening to would be 1...

I don't know how much he's done this before, and since I'm new I really don't have a lot of say in the matter. But he should get another chance, at least one more.

[0o0]

Originally Posted by psychoangel691

What's the excuse for the other games then?

by games you mean game
he did it in that game because everyone else excluding me was fucking retarded

Im just sayin, the dudes volatile and if u take into consideration just how bad the last few posts have been (woah ppl whp dont play any more trying to fan the flames because if theres drama we gotta b a part of it, rite)

so

stop being shitlords, that goes for everyone on ffr that reads this post

u shitlords

[0o0]

red blaster just do what i do when im town and on a lynching block

say that youre going to stop posting
and then stop posting

[0o0]

Originally Posted by YoshL

if you're curious, i don't play anymore because of you, and some other factors, but mostly because of you lol

you are vain as fuck

[0o0]

Originally Posted by Cold Kitten

i just want to say that i likely won't sign up for any games red blaster is in anymore bc fuck this shit.

i was the host of the game he ACTUALLY flipped his role in and I was pissed. Ask anyone I talked to about it. I never got an apology from him which is total bullshit, but whatever doesn't matter i guess.

regardless, imo, yes he should be banned from twg on ffr but not my decision to make so whatever

/2cents

and so are you, wow sugoi ze hoho

[Charu]

Am I a shitlord sugoi?

[Cold Kitten]

Originally Posted by 0o0

and so are you, wow sugoi ze hoho

cool

[choof]

owned
can we start giving out infractions for ppl self-voting unless they're doing it as a gambit or as a play (ie hammering yourself in a game with no night talk as a wolf to stop conversation)

[Funnygurl555]

Originally Posted by choof

owned
can we start giving out infractions for ppl self-voting unless they're doing it as a gambit or as a play (ie hammering yourself in a game with no night talk as a wolf to stop conversation)

imo this is annoying and I wish it were not a thing but it's legal

Also I get an infraction myself for 133.

[thesunfan]

ok if we're giving out infractions for self-voting I don't approve of that at all
albeit there are few situations where it is good to do so, it technically has strategy, although I think people do it in really stupid ways it shouldn't give a penalty at all.

and since Red played the "this isn't the only place I can play TWG," which is true, remember that what you do carries over to other forums. DM has warned other communities about certain players joining their games and vis versa. Yeah you could probably find another place if you get perma'd here, but if you didn't learn anything from the perma then you're likely just going to end up repeating the charade.

Tl;dr be good. You're fine enough outside of doing what you're doing, and you make the bed you lie in. Don't make things worse than they have to be for you.

PS hope the situation works out better for you.

[FictionJunction]

Originally Posted by choof

owned
can we start giving out infractions for ppl self-voting unless they're doing it as a gambit or as a play (ie hammering yourself in a game with no night talk as a wolf to stop conversation)

no

[_Zenith_]

Isn't it safe to say that we all know what self voting does/is capable in a game? Generally, even though it isn't role indicative of a player, the playerbase is disgusted when dealing with someone who self votes but the situation may vary on when the best and worst times to do such is.

Like if you're in a 3way, town-aligned and self then it would be grounds for GT I would assume, but if you're in any phase except for a 3way then it should be viable. Selfing to me seems like a good way to score poor attitudes about it, hammering yourself if you're pretty much an outed wolf and have no solid way of arguing your alignment, or even (and I haven't seen this in a game yet) give the hammer to the clear/PR (I think the reason this doesn't happen is because there is no situation where 2 votes = insta except for a 3way, and wolves could throw votes on someone else, though that would be scummy all on it's own).

idk food for thought take it or laugh at it

[FictionJunction]

you guys have to really get over the fact you can't control how people will play the game - banning self-votes is stupid and ignorant regulation because you're trying to normalize how the game should be played.

The only things that should not be allowed are actions that take the players away from the setting. Examples of these are: posting your PM and forfeiting the game without help of the host before you're the last red (although I'd argue forfeiting should always be through the host).

TWG is about lying, analyzing behavior and positioning. You can't tell me not to vote for myself just because you don't know what to do when you see me vote for myself.

[FictionJunction]

It's the equivalent of saying 'vigi's should never vigi another power role if they know who that power role is because it's bad for humans!'

Which is bullshit because I should always have the option to vigi the seer if I want to.

[j-rodd123]

and lack of participation should be extremely discouraged and not seen as a viable strategy either

[FictionJunction]

but post minimums aren't the way to regulate that

[j-rodd123]

yep they've been proven

[j-rodd123]

but it's something a host needs to suggest if they want it and make it clear when their game is being voted