10-25-2018, 04:44 PM | #41 | |
✘ Forever OP✘
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada,Quebec
Age: 28
Posts: 4,171
|
Re: Terminal Categorization
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2018, 05:48 PM | #42 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 778
|
Re: Terminal Categorization
Quote:
Then the categories are somewhat easily detectable in programming. Technique = variation in frames between notes and # of colors. Stamina = Total # of notes Power = ?? Hardest to code actually. Highest NPS per column? Stream = When single notes are the same frame distance as the last note +/- 1 frame. Anchor = #Jumps + 2*#Triples + 3*#Quads After the program analyzes the raw file data, the community can refine it, but its good to have an objective baseline. Last edited by emulord; 10-25-2018 at 05:52 PM.. |
|
10-25-2018, 06:04 PM | #43 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Age: 35
Posts: 509
|
Re: Terminal Categorization
Quote:
I hear ya about power. I was thinking you could take the highest beat and then look for repeats of the same arrow to avoid the program recognizing beginner-level jacks lol I also decided against putting triplets in as playing a song with crossovers will get you the same timing memory, but if you guys think there's a place in the categories let me know! And I'm not worried op lol I was just messing around with not finding a consensus, no ill will taken or given!
__________________
im trash |
|
10-25-2018, 06:15 PM | #44 | ||
✘ Forever OP✘
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada,Quebec
Age: 28
Posts: 4,171
|
Re: Terminal Categorization
Quote:
Isn't anchor like {1, 12, 13, 1, 14, 1} (anchor on 1) ? I've never heard an other definition of it on here. JS can have litterally 0 anchor. How do you account for pauses (pretty common thing) ? No matter long or short ones they'll add up in the variation without being "technical". You need a quite rigorous formula to code this one. This can be alright I guess, but it'll be biaised by the difficulty of the files (i.e. harder songs have more notes in less time in general). This won't work: any spike will make the nps high without it be the mentionned patterns specifically. I've worked with nps stats already and they need careful handling. Quote:
See my point above about anchors. Idk what this would represent. Although you would now have some way to compute the categories (if fixed the above), you also have to aggregate the numbers in some sort of scale too, since you don't have specific units so like category 1 can give 183 and category 2 would be 1036 for example. You could scale everything by having the max of all 5 be equal to 1.0 and the rest would vary between 0.0 and 1.0, but that loses file-to-file comparision. Gotta think about that step too. Last edited by xXOpkillerXx; 10-25-2018 at 06:17 PM.. |
||
10-25-2018, 08:29 PM | #45 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Age: 35
Posts: 509
|
Re: Terminal Categorization
I used anchor like a weight system. Each additional note you have to hit adds more weight or anchors your hands in more definite positions.
Also makes sense technique would be a bitch to code, the category itself is filled with tomfoolery
__________________
im trash |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|