08-21-2011, 10:18 PM | #1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
These ratings are bullshit (judgement for das ist muzik)
At the risk of sounding butthurt, I don't agree with 3 of the ratings at all. Niala's, Samurai's and Silvuh's reviews are way too subjective and all about "I don't like this song" or "I don't like that pattern". I know this file could use a few fix ups, but to give it a 2 out of 5 is bullshit.
Quote:
Some of the issues mentioned (parts dragging on) can be fixed with a cut as niala suggested in his review. Some of the patterns can be changed to improve flow but this is merely a suggestion don't you think? It's meant to be a hard file and it's not like I've put aids jacks or any other bullshit all over the place. The arrow at around 6.05 I hear pretty distinctly but if it's that big of a bother I can remove it.. Pattern variation at the jumptrill sections was iffy because if I simplified it, it would be inconsistent with the rest of the file, and if I changed them up with the current layering it would be aids to hit. Just to make it clear, this is the review I agree with. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Obnoxious and grating? Sounds rather subjective. Give more details guys... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This was done to improve flow. Quote:
What in the file is so terribly off and needs major fixing that it constitutes for a ? Also, next time put more time into judging instead of playing all files in 2 hours. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't step the 12ths in the background because that would be way overstepped for that part, except for those last few 12ths when it becomes quieter. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If you are referring to notes such as on beat 541.50. Those are specifically for the louder snares you hear in those sections. If that's not what you mean, then I don't know what you are talking about Even so, this review reeks of personal distaste about the song/patterns used and unanswered questions (with sometimes obvious answers). Why the ? No offense to anyone personally, but these reviews are way too subjective and take too much personal taste into consideration ("I don't like this pattern" or "I would've liked it better this way"). That's not the point of reviews, since the patterns chosen (if correct, which they are) are the stepartists personal take on the file. If you didn't like the file that way, step it yourself, but don't go around saying shit like "meh not my taste and I would've done it a different so it's a ?", cause that's ****ing bullshit. Nothing in this file is bad enough to constitute for a 2 out of 5. That's a really ****ing low rating. tl;dr Reviews are too subjective and ratings are used as a personal measurement tool of how they think of the file instead of following the guidelines for the ratings.
__________________
Last edited by Nullifidian; 08-21-2011 at 10:21 PM.. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
08-21-2011, 10:24 PM | #2 |
FFR Player
|
Re: These ratings are bullshit (judgement for das ist muzik)
sad that this is barely being brought up now even though its been going on forever
__________________
|
08-21-2011, 10:32 PM | #3 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: These ratings are bullshit (judgement for das ist muzik)
There has always been debates on this kinda stuff. But iirc one of the times there was a debate about this it was said not to like make a huge posting about it but to go to JX or bmah about it and they would look over the file. I guess in this case it would be JX since bmah already judged it.
|
08-21-2011, 10:45 PM | #4 |
★★★★★
|
Re: These ratings are bullshit (judgement for das ist muzik)
I'll take a look at it, not a new thread material.
calm down a bit more and continue discussion here. http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...d.php?t=119608 Last edited by jimerax; 08-21-2011 at 10:58 PM.. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|