!!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> - Page 4

**Nullifidian** · 08-8-2009, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who_cares973

because you can tell the difference between 320kbps and anything higher !_!

Are you trying to be a smartass? ^_-
I was talking about lower qualities. Most rips you find in torrents are 128 to 192 kbps, and they sound alot worse than 320 kbps or v0 quality.
There's no significant audible difference between 320 kbps and lossless no, but I just like to keep them cause it's CD quality.

With a good set of speakers or headphones you can hear some difference though, and you can set the volume as high as you want without it crackling or distorting.

**Frank Munoz** · 08-8-2009, 06:51 PM

masuat · 08-8-2009, 11:00 PM

I find that I can't tell the difference between 128 kbps or anything higher when it's playing on speakers, just because they're not right up to my ear. With iems plugged in my ear using my DAP it becomes ridiculously pronounced.

200 bpm of muddy UNCE UNCE WHUMP WHUMP at 128 kbps? Nobody at the party's going to tell the difference lol xd kawaii !!

who_cares973 · 08-8-2009, 11:02 PM

the difference between 128kbps and 320kbps is most def noticeable

**Frank Munoz** · 08-9-2009, 01:35 PM

**Heartseeker7** · 08-9-2009, 01:49 PM

If you can't tell the difference between 128 and 320kbps, maybe you should be listening to DJ Sharpnel after all......
Jokes, respect for what they do.

I downloaded the discography (Well, the closest one to a complete discography as I could...), and only found about 25-30 songs out of all of them actually worth putting on my mp3 player. I find the other stuff to repetitive, or just plain ol' not good. As Spitfire said earlier, "sometimes they strike gold. :3 And when they do, it's eargasmic."

(>UNCE,.,UNCE)>

masuat · 08-9-2009, 02:25 PM

If that was directed at me, I meant that I can't hear it when I"m listening to music at 2am and have to set the speaker volume to a low level. A 128kbps vs a lossless UNCE at like 2dB doesn't mean jack. When I got IEMs plugged right in my ear and at whatever volume, then the difference is obviously pretty pronounced.

(>herp,.,derp)>

08-8-2009, 06:51 PM	#62
Frank Munoz Vophie Join Date: Nov 2007 Age: 30 Posts: 1,964	Re: !!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> __________________ Unknown and Unofficial Last edited by Frank Munoz; 08-14-2011 at 11:21 AM..

08-8-2009, 11:00 PM	#63
masuat FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 133	Re: !!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> I find that I can't tell the difference between 128 kbps or anything higher when it's playing on speakers, just because they're not right up to my ear. With iems plugged in my ear using my DAP it becomes ridiculously pronounced. 200 bpm of muddy UNCE UNCE WHUMP WHUMP at 128 kbps? Nobody at the party's going to tell the difference lol xd kawaii !!

08-8-2009, 11:02 PM	#64
who_cares973 FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: :U Age: 35 Posts: 15,407	Re: !!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> the difference between 128kbps and 320kbps is most def noticeable __________________

08-9-2009, 01:35 PM	#65
Frank Munoz Vophie Join Date: Nov 2007 Age: 30 Posts: 1,964	Re: !!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> __________________ Unknown and Unofficial Last edited by Frank Munoz; 08-14-2011 at 11:21 AM..

08-9-2009, 02:25 PM	#67
masuat FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 133	Re: !!!Dj Sharpnel(>^,.,^)> If that was directed at me, I meant that I can't hear it when I"m listening to music at 2am and have to set the speaker volume to a low level. A 128kbps vs a lossless UNCE at like 2dB doesn't mean jack. When I got IEMs plugged right in my ear and at whatever volume, then the difference is obviously pretty pronounced. (>herp,.,derp)>

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)