|
|
#11 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York City, New York
Posts: 8,340
|
Honestly, you were totally crushed in that debate. Every argument you threw at me was completely torn apart, and you ignored half of the evidence/arguments that contradicted your claims. Your only retaliation was to spin it towards extraordinarily strange thought experiments, only to get dominated there as a result of a lack of understanding for how the human brain actually works. In the end, when the entire argument clearly destroyed your position, all you were able to say is "Well I don't care, I still believe in God."
The main problem between theistic/atheistic debates is that, from what I find, theists have an extraordinarily bad understanding of the scientific views against their favor. Either way, a theist is not concerned with proof, and so all efforts are nullified from the getgo. But I will once again proclaim that I can "let it get to my head" because I'm right. The only thing I regret is that when people die and realize they're returning to the same state of nonexistence that they did before they were born, I won't be able to say "Hah! Told you so!" There is a very good reason why we don't look at a 24-sigma event and put "faith" in the residual. If we've been flipping Heads the whole time, we don't kick Occam's Razor in the face hoping for Tails with a BS explanation. We use our brains and understand that it's a two-headed coin. Of course, relating back to my original point, choosing to agree or disagree with any given view of the heavens won't matter. An atheist and theist alike can still live a fulfilling life. Izzy: Actually he would make for a very bad lawyer. Pure fluff and misunderstanding will get pissed on hardcore in the face of a more robust argument.
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY Last edited by MrRubix; 11-12-2009 at 02:44 PM.. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|
|