Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution > General Discussion > Critical Thinking
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-12-2009, 02:41 PM   #11
MrRubix
FFR Player
FFR Veteran
 
MrRubix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York City, New York
Posts: 8,340
Default Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhss1992 View Post
Do you remember the Metaphysics thread?
Honestly, you were totally crushed in that debate. Every argument you threw at me was completely torn apart, and you ignored half of the evidence/arguments that contradicted your claims. Your only retaliation was to spin it towards extraordinarily strange thought experiments, only to get dominated there as a result of a lack of understanding for how the human brain actually works. In the end, when the entire argument clearly destroyed your position, all you were able to say is "Well I don't care, I still believe in God."

The main problem between theistic/atheistic debates is that, from what I find, theists have an extraordinarily bad understanding of the scientific views against their favor. Either way, a theist is not concerned with proof, and so all efforts are nullified from the getgo.

But I will once again proclaim that I can "let it get to my head" because I'm right. The only thing I regret is that when people die and realize they're returning to the same state of nonexistence that they did before they were born, I won't be able to say "Hah! Told you so!" There is a very good reason why we don't look at a 24-sigma event and put "faith" in the residual. If we've been flipping Heads the whole time, we don't kick Occam's Razor in the face hoping for Tails with a BS explanation. We use our brains and understand that it's a two-headed coin.

Of course, relating back to my original point, choosing to agree or disagree with any given view of the heavens won't matter. An atheist and theist alike can still live a fulfilling life.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy View Post
I feel like bobeck would make a good lawyer. Uses really fluffed up paragraphs full of no actual information or argument while dodging every question and argument thrown at him.
Izzy: Actually he would make for a very bad lawyer. Pure fluff and misunderstanding will get pissed on hardcore in the face of a more robust argument.

Last edited by MrRubix; 11-12-2009 at 02:44 PM..
MrRubix is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution