Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution: Community Forums > General Discussion > Critical Thinking

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2006, 06:19 AM   #1
coberst
FFR Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 256
Default Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

The following is a paragraph from a Wikipedia entry for Thomas Kuhn’s book titled “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”.

Quote:
“The changes that occur in politics, society and business are often expressed in Kuhnian terms, however poor their parallel with the practice of science may seem to scientists and historians of science. The terms "paradigm" and "paradigm shift" have become such notorious clichés and buzzwords that they are viewed in many circles as being effectively devoid of content and their use in these contexts rarely has any firm foundation in Kuhn's original definitions.”

This paragraph gives us some insight into the dangers inherent in our sound-bite, bumper-sticker society, in which many people gain a small fragment of knowledge and from this fragment are deluded into thinking that they comprehend very complex ideas.

I am not much of a user of Wikipedia and thus have little knowledge upon which I can answer my own question.
coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 09:21 AM   #2
Patashu
FFR Simfile Author
FFR Simfile Author
 
Patashu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: we traced the call...it's coming from inside the house
Age: 30
Posts: 8,608
Send a message via AIM to Patashu Send a message via MSN to Patashu Send a message via Yahoo to Patashu
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

I have no idea what that meant, actually.

There you go.
__________________
Patashu makes Chiptunes in Famitracker:
http://soundcloud.com/patashu/8bit-progressive-metal-fading-world
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v216/Mechadragon/smallpackbanner.png
Best non-AAAs: ERx8 v2 (14-1-0-4), Hajnal (3-0-0-0), RunnyMorning (8-0-0-4), Xeno-Flow (1-0-0-3), Blue Rose (35-2-0-20), Ketsarku (14-0-0-0), Silence (1-0-0-0), Lolo (14-1-0-1)
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee301/xiaoven/solorulzsig.png
Patashu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 09:45 AM   #3
Omeganitros
auauauau
FFR Veteran
 
Omeganitros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hee-Haw!
Age: 31
Posts: 8,899
Send a message via AIM to Omeganitros
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Basically, I think he's asking "Does Wikipedia makes us full of our ignorant selves?"

If I were to look up, say, Gestalt Theory (yay aperson) and read the whole article, would I know what Gestalt Theory is, or just get the gist of it?

I suppose the answer varies from term to term, but I think overall Wikipedia is pretty good at having thorough articles.
Omeganitros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 10:40 AM   #4
Laharl
FFR Player
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 35
Posts: 1,821
Send a message via AIM to Laharl Send a message via MSN to Laharl
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Wikipedia is a good source for information, provided that if it seems like the article is inherently biased, links to more reputable sources of information are usually listed.

Without following the links to verify if the information is correct, it's just like any other source of information.
__________________
SIG PICTURES:

POINTLESSLY TAKING UP BANDWIDTH SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE INTERNET
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 10:56 AM   #5
Squeek
let it snow~
FFR Veteran
 
Squeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 34
Posts: 14,457
Send a message via AIM to Squeek
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

I dunno.

Can you learn about a topic from an encyclopedia alone?

Therefore, can you learn it from an online encyclopedia that always updates and has external links?
Squeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 11:29 AM   #6
WillTalbot
FFR Player
FFR Veteran
 
WillTalbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Orange, NJ
Age: 28
Posts: 579
Send a message via AIM to WillTalbot Send a message via MSN to WillTalbot Send a message via Yahoo to WillTalbot
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Who cares? It's as useful as ever!
WillTalbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 01:10 PM   #7
Grandiagod
FFR Player
 
Grandiagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Feaefaw
Age: 32
Posts: 6,122
Send a message via AIM to Grandiagod Send a message via MSN to Grandiagod
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Wikipedia is better than conventional encyclopedias in every way. Actually, Wiki may just be the biggest combined repository of knowlege on the internet.

How people react to learning is their own problem.
__________________
He who angers you conquers you. ~Elizabeth Kenny
Grandiagod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 05:33 PM   #8
Anticrombie0909
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,683
Send a message via AIM to Anticrombie0909
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

I cannot stand when people criticize Wikipedia simply because it's user contributed. Just because it's constantly being updated with new and relevant information, something encyclopedias cannot do, doesn't mean that information is somehow false.

Wikipedia is heavily moderated, and even the smallest changes are brought to fact-checker's attention. To test my theory, I once found a random entry about fish. In the middle of a random paragraph, I included the line "A fish's bones are most peculiar in that they are flexible and made mostly from cartiledge." Within two minutes it was flagged and removed.

Try it. Really. See how long it lasts.
Anticrombie0909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 07:31 PM   #9
Squeek
let it snow~
FFR Veteran
 
Squeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 34
Posts: 14,457
Send a message via AIM to Squeek
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Our very own LD is an admin there =)

It's true. It bothers me that professors don't allow wikipedia as a reference simply because it's POSSIBLE that you get falsified information.

Even then, you can use it to learn about the topic and use an external link as a source, so it's all good.
Squeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 07:55 PM   #10
chickendude
Away from Computer
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
chickendude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 30
Posts: 1,901
Send a message via AIM to chickendude
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

A lot of the time, wikipedia articles directly quote paragraphs from their sources.

If you look at the sources, you will find paragraphs from each of them spliced together with some transitionals in between. Wikipedia is a good way of finding knowledge, and if reputable sources are required, the links provide a great source for research.
Using an encyclopedia as a research source isn't a good idea for good research. It's a good starting point for redirection to better sources.

My teacher doesn't allow wikipedia as a reliable source but promotes its use as a diving board for the pool of information on a topic.
__________________
chickendude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 08:58 AM   #11
ebs2002
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 37
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to ebs2002
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

I'm sorry, but I don't think the OP makes any sense whatsoever.

Quote:
Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?
False authority? How so? Where does the site itself try to exert any type of authority?
Quote:
The following is a paragraph from a Wikipedia entry for Thomas Kuhn’s book titled “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”.
Note that the entry is not written by Wikipedia as a whole, but by someone who claims to be learned in the field (and has not been refuted by anybody else who has reviewed it).

Quote:
“The changes that occur in politics, society and business are often expressed in Kuhnian terms, however poor their parallel with the practice of science may seem to scientists and historians of science. The terms "paradigm" and "paradigm shift" have become such notorious clichés and buzzwords that they are viewed in many circles as being effectively devoid of content and their use in these contexts rarely has any firm foundation in Kuhn's original definitions.”
In other words, the writer of that article thinks that society has changed the definition of "Paradigm" to not reflect Kuhn's original topic. If you disagree with this, then make an argument against it. I personally agree with the statement.

Quote:
This paragraph gives us some insight into the dangers inherent in our sound-bite, bumper-sticker society, in which many people gain a small fragment of knowledge and from this fragment are deluded into thinking that they comprehend very complex ideas.
Are you claiming that the wikipedia post is contributing false information? Or are you upset that the information is incomplete? Perfect! You're just what wikipedia is looking for: someone to contribute.

By nature, Wikipedia is always going to be a work-in-progress. It never claims to be the final word on anything, and as such I can't agree with the notion of it exerting any kind of authority over people due to a lack of information.

I am not much of a user of Wikipedia and thus have little knowledge upon which I can answer my own question.[/quote]
ebs2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 11:23 AM   #12
WillTalbot
FFR Player
FFR Veteran
 
WillTalbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Orange, NJ
Age: 28
Posts: 579
Send a message via AIM to WillTalbot Send a message via MSN to WillTalbot Send a message via Yahoo to WillTalbot
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

You can't critisize wikipedia for giving false information but you can critisize the submitters.
WillTalbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 11:55 AM   #13
coberst
FFR Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 256
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

This is a response I received that you might find interesting.

I'm a current college student, and any paper that cites Wikipedia as a source automatically gets a failing grade. It's not an appropriate scholarly source, since the articles are anonymous and therefore the author's credentials cannot be verified. For this reason, it doesn't qualify as an authoritative source. It's also edit-able by anyone, as was mentioned uptopic.

I had one prof that said he didn't even want us using it as an idea generator. That said, I often refer to it, but only to get general information. I have other sources. Questia.com is an awesome library. It's not free, but a hundred bucks a year for the kind of research I can do there is well worth it.
coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 12:28 PM   #14
lightdarkness
Summer!!
Retired StaffFFR Veteran
 
lightdarkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 32
Posts: 11,308
Send a message via AIM to lightdarkness Send a message via MSN to lightdarkness Send a message via Yahoo to lightdarkness Send a message via Skype™ to lightdarkness
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeek View Post
Our very own LD is an admin there =)
this is the only line of this thread that matters.
__________________
lightdarkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 09:21 PM   #15
Cavernio
sunshine and rainbows
FFR Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 1,987
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

What I think cobherst was trying to get at in the OP is that perhaps the information on Wikipedia is becoming like the meaning of 'paradigm' that Kuhn used. Overused, not giving the whole picture, etc. But as was already said, that's what all encyclopedias do.

I agree with the profs who say that Wikipedia isn't a good source. But then again, the paper's I've written have mainly been science based, and the only acceptable source are journal articles, and 90% of what you use should be original sources, with other sources only means to get ideas from. When writing a scientific article, one should always refer back to the original creator of information. But that's because we don't want people citing from citations, because with each interpretation of something, its less accurate. (Not necessarily less informative; often more informative.) And that's essentially what I see the crux of cob's argument is anyways.
Cavernio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 09:19 PM   #16
kangolokster
Gotti
FFR Veteran
 
kangolokster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 31
Posts: 345
Send a message via AIM to kangolokster Send a message via Skype™ to kangolokster
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Spam? In my CT?

Well, actually, I can't claim CT, as I hate it with a fiery passion.

However, what the goddamn is wrong with you?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xx{Midnight}xX View Post
Stahp

Last edited by stretchypanda; 03-12-2007 at 09:35 PM..
kangolokster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 12:17 AM   #17
Sapphire Rain
FFR Player
 
Sapphire Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a house
Posts: 14
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

I don't think we can single out Wikipedia. Many people will read an article online or watch a televison program and assume they are suddenly an expert on the subject. At least Wikipedia requires citations so it is more likely to provide accurate information than some random website, and many Wikipedia articles are quite detailed.
Sapphire Rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 12:21 AM   #18
wickedawesomeful
Carls, Girls, & Drugs
FFR Music Producer
 
wickedawesomeful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tosh's noose.
Age: 27
Posts: 3,888
Send a message via AIM to wickedawesomeful
Default Re: Does Wikipedia provide false authority to our sound-bite society?

Wow. Way to look at the post dates.
__________________
http://dozemusic.com/
wickedawesomeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution