[xXOpkillerXx]

Here's something I am wondering about per-hand stuff.

Is it safe to assume that any section with a high nps (x) on {3} and a lower nps on {4} is Harder than having x nps on both {3} and {4} ? Any counterexample is welcome.

More visually, I'm thinking that [34]4[34]4 is always harder than [34][34][34][34]. But only per-hand, so the same wouldn't apply with combinations of receptors like {2} and {3}, or {2} and {4}, etc. And by always I mean no matter what is before it, after it, and what's going on on the other receptors.

EDIT:
I will even go as far as claiming that if x is the nps on {3} and y is the nps on {4}, the peak of that per-hand difficulty is reached when x = 2y or 2x = y. When you lower small nps, you get things like [34]44[34]44[34]44, and when you raise it, you get [34][34]4[34][34]4, both of which I would argue are objectively easier than [34]4[34]4[34]4.