Quote:
Originally Posted by Dinglesberry
Could you factor in the occurrence of certain types of notes during sequences? Just as an example, a 20 nps section of single note streams is probabaly much harder than a 20 nps section of dense js where every other note is a jump, so maybe you could find some ratio of single notes to jumps etc
|
Hmmm, what you're saying is that [1, {2,3}, 4] in 1 second is harder than [1, 2, 3, 4], am I correct ? Rebember that if you have the same nps, the gap between {1} and {23} in js will be bigger than the one between {1}, {2} and {3} in pure stream. If you do believe that the former is more difficult, could you please elaborate on why ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dinglesberry
Obviously 4 nps of repeated jacks is harder than 4 nps of a roll etc, but there's also things like 20 nps of streams that are rolly are generally easier than 20 nps of streams with lots of ohts
|
Those would also be taken into account with the per-receptor nps ! for example, if you have a stream like [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2 ,3 ,4] over 2 seconds, all receptors will have the same max nps of 1. On the other hand, if you have [1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4] on 2 seconds, all receptors will have a max nps of 2 !
Thanks for your questions