Ah I found it. That was fast
Sorry if anyone happens to be from Africa. Here it is:
Since childhood, there are things that we are taught, and as children, we
accept them without question. Things like the earth being round, or Africa. We
may not have been to Africa, but we’re told that it’s there, and we are shown
pictures. But who’s to say that it doesn’t exist? For all we know it may not.
That’s much like the structure of the earth. Science has told us that due to
testing with seismic waves, we can be assured that our planet is made up of
several different layers of rock in varying state of solidity. But here is one
case where you shouldn’t always believe what science tells you. It is my
postulation that the earth is not a solid sphere, but rather, is hollow in some
way shape or form. But before this theory can be declared true or false, it
must be made clear that there are several variants on the hollow earth theory.
In 1692, Edmund Halley, of whom the comet is a namesake, proposed his own
theory about he structure of the earth during his studies of its magnetic
fields. In his model, the earth is composed of some four spheres, each with its
own magnetic field, and the interplay between these fields is what causes the
variants in the field seen on our level of the earth. He also went on to say
that it is possible that these other spheres supported life, and had a luminous
atmosphere. It was gases in these atmospheres which seeped through thin crusts
at the poles, causing the aurora borealis, and australis.
Later, mathematician Leonhard Euler, after which the Euler Circuit and Path are
named, proposed that the earth is one large hollow sphere, containing one 600
mile diameter sun, providing heat and light for an advanced people or peoples
that lived there. A second mathematician, Sir John Leslie, said that the
interior housed two suns, which he named Pluto and Prosperine.
Another mathematician, John Symmes added onto Euler’s theory by stating that
there were two holes, one at each pole, through which one would be able to reach
the interior of the planet. His idea was so popular so as ti name the holes
after him, Symmes Holes, and is also the most commonly held view on the anatomy
of the hollow earth.
Although not always recognized as a hollow earth theory, the thought that there
may be subterranean caves supporting animal life seems fairly plausible. As
described in the book “Journey to the Center of the Earth,” by Jules Verne, this
variant of the hollow earth would have many large caverns that are
interconnected by tunnels, both natural and, some say, man-made. These large
caves would support an abundance of flora and fauna, and be lit by luminous
gases.
The most outlandish theory, however, came also in the late 1800's. Cyrus Teed
stated that rather than the outside, we in fact live on the inside of the
planet, and in the center hovers the sun. One side dark, the other light. As
it spins, it gives an appearance of sunrise and sunset. This theory, however,
died rather quickly.
Often coupled with these theories of the hollow earth are other things that are
often dismissed as purely flights of fancy. One of the most notable ties in
with Nazi Germany near the end of WWII. Adolf Hitler sent a small expedition to
north in an effort to find out more. They attempted to take pictures of a small
fleet of British ships which were supposed to be anchored on what would be the
other side of the Symmes Hole at the pole. However, their attempts failed
seeing as to the fact that the hole is too far to see to the other side without
the aid of fairly powerful telescopes.
It has also been said that a master race lives in the center. Be it the
“original” inhabitants of this planet, aliens, or even the survivors of
Atlantis. Also connected are UFOs which are often said to be the vehicles of
the aforementioned races.
All of these facts may be a little bit much to take at once, but it is not
without backing.
In the year of 1926, Admiral Richard Byrd became the first to fly over the
north pole, and also gave some of the greatest evidence for an earth with a
Euler-type anatomy.
As records, Byrd broadcast all he saw over the radio, and kept a short journal,
detailing what he saw. At the time, the only radio systems available would
broadcast for all to hear, so those fortunate to be tuned in were in for quite a
shock. These few people did confirm his stories, however they are now unable to
speak of what they heard that night.
What they heard is quite astounding. In the course of his remarks, such things
were described which would be enough to amaze anyone. He spoke first of the
general terrain. What was supposed to be naught but ice and snow, he gradually
began to find green grass. By this point, it is assumed that he has unknowingly
entered through the Symmes Hole and is inside the earth, because next he sees
something out of pre-history books. Below him was an animal, resembling an
elephant. Upon a slightly longer and closer inspection, he found it to be a
mastodon. The finding of this creature explains how carcasses have been found
having fresh food inside their mouths and stomachs. Here, and excerpt from his
log:1005 Hours- I alter altitude to 1400 feet and execute a sharp left turn to
better examine the valley below. It is green with either moss or a type of tight
knit grass. The Light here seems different. I cannot see the Sun anymore. We
make another left turn and we spot what seems to be a large animal of some kind
below us. It appears to be an elephant! NO!!! It looks more like a mammoth! This
is incredible! Yet, there it is! Decrease altitude to 1000 feet and take
binoculars to better examine the animal. It is confirmed - it is definitely a
mammoth-like ani mal! Report this to base camp.
This, and other entries and broadcasts have been verified by those who had
their radios listening in. However, as stated earlier, they were instructed to
never speak of what was heard.
This leads up to the next topic, that of knowledge, or rather, a lack of it.
Although it may be deemed laughable, here is an appropriate time to cry
“Conspiracy!” As previously mentioned, those who heard the recant of the sights
during the Byrd expedition were given explicit instructions to keep quiet.
Although that alone doesn’t necessarily mean government conspiracy, it is a good
indication that something is going on. But when you add in other factors, you
may find it rather hard to discount it all as mere conspiracy theories. For
example, it is now virtually impossible to reach the pole. Air traffic there is
not allowed, neither are private expeditions. Despite the fact that no country
has that space claimed, our government does not allow any sort of travel over or
to the pole.
Why, then, would they do such a thing if they weren’t hiding anything?
Possibly to protect the safety of civilians? Regardless of precautions,
supplies, and investments, there is no room for leeway. No, safety is not the
case. Surely there are more pressing things that we need to be protected from
than an area that can allow us to reap great geological benefits. It would seem
that the danger would be just as great if one were to travel to remote regions
of Alaska, yet these are not restricted. It would seem that there is something,
then, that must be there.
Besides restrictions at the poles, there are also restrictions We have not only
testimony and blatant cover up to help prove, we have photos.
These photos show a large dark hole in the northern reaches of our planet.
Surely, this is enough to show. However, the opposition in the form of science
claims that these are merely areas were the sun never shines, therefore they are
black. That does not explain it well enough, however. IF it were really just where the sun did not shine, there would still be light there to some degree due to the dispersal of the rays.
There may then be cries of forgery, easy to do in these days of computers. But
if you are to say that these photos are faked, then what is to say that the ones
shown that have no hole aren’t faked? If there was a cover-up as mentioned,
then it would be in the best interest of the involved parties to doctor the
photos and spread them around. Neither of these can be conclusively proven,
though, unless we are able to ourselves check the validity of either side by a
complete and thorough search of both poles.
There are some who say that no such expenditure of resources is needed, because
proof of the theory of the hollow earth’s fallacies are everywhere. There are
those trips to the poles that didn’t include any mention of a hole. But these
expeditions usually just went until their compasses told them that they were at
the north pole, then they turned around and went home. The others who are there
for scientific reasons are there by will of the government, being on a federal
bill, and therefore kept on a nice tight leash.
Next, is the comment on magnetic fields. If there were no molten inner core,
there would be no magnetic field. But with Halley’s version, with the various
spheres inside of each other, it may be possible to create a magnetic field,
depending on the elements in each particular sphere. Also, it could account for
the variants in the field from time to time.
Lastly, there have been seismic tests that show that the innards of our planet
is made up of layers. But if using the Jules Verne-themed earth, then it can be
quite possible that the layers are still there, but the holes exist. The
seismic waves would presumably disappear when faced with a large cavern, and the
geologists were not looking for holes, so if the waves disappeared, they would
most likely just try a slightly different wave or angle to try and pass through.
Or even if the earth were to be composed as Euler proposed, then the layers
could still exist, but not as thick or as many, given the more limited space
allowed between the crust on the outside and the inside. Also, to factor in
layers with Euler’s version, then the space and the sun inside of the earth
would have to be considerably smaller, to make room for the extra mass.
To conclude, the earth is, in some manner, hollow. Possibly the best variant
of this is the variant likened to Jules Verne’s book. It is able to support
most all of the scientific evidence while still fitting the criteria for being a
hollow earth. Hopefully, now that you have been armed with more informatioin, next time someone tells you about Africa, you'll have the sense of mind to doubt them.