[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

If you have a player who you believe is wolf, and you can't really see how anyone is justified saying otherwise, you'd want to solve that player first and you'd want to solve those others should he flip red

How can you simply not see how anyone is justified in saying otherwise? Everyone else has completely different information than you and therefore a different perspective on the game? This is so narrow-minded. Think about it from everyone else's perspective

It makes sense to want to solve your suspicions. It doesn't make sense to not see how other people are justified in questioning your reads. We are playing too

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

Literally against the rules but ok

No it isn't? I had FFA on ignore for like a year when I kept getting baited into arguing with him in games