[reuben_tate]

Originally Posted by bugkid666

we should equally value both of those options, i think.

I disagree with this sentiment in general. There are a myriad of possibilities for this game, but some of them are much more "likely" than others. Some combination of Occam's Razor and some kind of weighted-risk-analysis should be used to inform our decisions. As an example, there could be some hidden mechanic where if I vote 4 times in a phase, then I'm instantly killed; however, the "likelihood" of such a mechanic is so small that it's not even worth considering.


At the same time though, everyone should maintain an open-mind and be flexible about having their current pre-conceived notions about the game being challenged.