[DDRNGGin]

As far as the results of Round 1, the reasoning is because there would be no knowledge of the performance of the players that didn't submit scores. Basically, I had to treat the results of 3 of the teams as if they didn't meet the under 55 Raw Goods requirement. If I did remove the outliers/worst scores from each teams, there would have been a significant skew of the data that would have thrown some people off. Keep in mind that participation of teammates was the main factor of the round 1 results. If Team Mostly Downscroll had a AAA sweep, they would have gotten 1st Place in Round 1, and they were capable of it because the team had 6 of the 7 members who AAA'd their songs. As far as Team 3, they had 31.6 Raw Goods, so it would have been extremely difficult to judge whether they would meet the under 55 Raw Goods objective or not with full participation. As far as Round 2 results, It's solely about solving the puzzles correctly. Team Egg Salad only had 2 members working on the puzzles, and managed all 21 correct answers. Thus, it would have been completely unfair if they were placed lower in Round 2 just because Team SUCC or Team Mostly Downscroll had nearly their entire team participate, despite having less than 21 correct answers.