[t-rogdor]

Originally Posted by flipsta_lombax

@links, numbers posted etc etc: I read the links. I expected at least one of them to tell me IC is a fluke, a fake propaganda, fallacy, NOT legit. All I read was skepticism and numbers accused of telling another story.

Those numbers suggest that they don't use the money for what purposes are stated. They also point out how the armies IC is literally funding rape and steal from people. So yeah. They're "a fallacy".

Originally Posted by flipsta_lombax

32% may sound small, but $2.8 mill is $2.8 mill, and it was the main chunk of their spending. No one paid them to reach lobbyists, no one paid them to grab a plane ticket to Uganda to show their support. They didn't want a half-ass movie to catch the eyes of the world.

32% of their total profits. 2.8 million dollars might be 2.8 million dollars, but it's nothing compared to the ~8 million that COULD have gone to actually doing something. While I appreciate the funds to make a movie and raise awareness, again I must stress that 1) They could've made a much lower budget film, 2) this movie won't accomplish jack shit, and 3) THEY SPENT 16 THOUSAND DOLLARS ON "ENTERTAINMENT". COMPANY MONEY ON THEIR OWN JOY.

Originally Posted by flipsta_lombax

I read in that tumble link saying "Something isn't always better than nothing. Sometimes it's worse." What a load of bullshit. Let me know when advocating something we believe is right is worse. Like being too lazy sitting on our ass, waiting for the Taco Bell/Doritos chip to come out. Fat asses.

lol you took the taco bell thing seriously.
something isn't better than nothing if that something goes to funding the wrong purposes. Advocating isn't bad; activism is great. BUT not when it's at the hands and purposes of a greedy bullshit company masquerading as a charity.

Originally Posted by flipsta_lombax

I hope you guys don't catch E.Coli from those Taco Bell Dorito chips. Then again...

wishing harm on your fellow man. A+ Activism talk!

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Choof and trog don't bring up any good points; they bring up points of laziness and distrust and worry that the group's incompetent. Essentially their point is 'why bother?'

no, my (our) point is 'why bother wasting your money when it's going into the hands of a company that is lying to you' and also 'this man is way more powerful than what Bullshit Pseudo-Activism can accomplish'.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

How many people who are against this have actually watched the video in full? Because the video clearly shows (perhaps erroneously, although I don't know how/why that would be the case, but there are clearly a bunch of skeptics) that when people actually worked together en masse towards getting the US government to do something, they did something.

...exceeeeept the US government has been trying to find this guy already, as it is. there's no need to get them to do something because they already fucen are. Also

Originally Posted by Cavernio

when people actually worked together en masse towards getting the US government to do something, they did something.

right because pressuring the government into not passing sopa only to have them turn around and start ACTA or whatever the hell it is was a total success.
total.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

It's no longer 'we hope world leaders will do something', it's 'we need more time to get this done, and we need to keep the pressure on the world leaders'.

how about 'we need to get off our stupid asses and do something ourselves instead of paying some company $30 so they can make a movie and then we sit back and hope the world leaders notice'. What speaks louder to you? Getting people to see a movie (effectively giving IC an assload of cash), or rioting in the streets until something is done?

Originally Posted by Cavernio

The message is loud and clear. Much like how SOPA and bill C32 have been put on hold due to public outcry, your opinion, and letting your opinion be known, matters.

Right! Your opinion matters until someone offers someone else money to ignore it. Welcome to politics, asshole.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Furthermore, again as the video states, world governments have done nothing because they've had no immediate reason to.

lmfao

Originally Posted by Cavernio

If your job is to run YOUR country as best as you can, as we see, it often becomes we vs they, and whatever shit that goes on in uganda is of no consequence, especially in light of all the shit that is likely going on in your country that you need to address. But if the people in your country are appalled and want to actually do something, who are you, as that country's leader, to say no?

i'm pretty sure that not only are you factually incorrect but completely unaware of how being in an office of power even works. It's pretty much NEVER "we vs they". International relations and, by proxy, problems that occur outside the country, are a large part of being a leader.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

It is unfortunate they don't explain where the money's going, choofers, but it's not like this is something like the Heart and Stroke foundation that works on an on-going basis, has been around for years, and knows how much money they'll probably get, so it's fairly easy to give break-downs of where the money's going.

any company that doesn't plan on being a long-term operation can stay right the **** away from my or anyone with half a brain's money

Originally Posted by Cavernio

If you're a one-time organization that wants to get stuff done for 1 particular cause, especially one where you hope you can raise a TON of money, then you'll do what you can with the money that you make, and specifically planning what to do with it and letting people know, will surely backfire if you don't actually keep to those guidelines you showed the donators.

so what you're saying is that they should keep the money they make and what they do with it private so they don't disappoint donators.
that is the worst decision any business could make. it's almost lying.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Obviously part of the money is going towards what goes inside the kits and paying people who have created the movement in the first place. The rest of the money we're assuming is going to go to military operations and then setting up safe havens for children, medical treatment, etc. I have no reason to believe that money I would spend on a kit would go anywhere else but towards helping out the situation in Uganda. The question, choofers, is not why you should trust invisiblechildren, but why you shouldn't. Is there a past history of this organization pocketing money? Are they being overly secretive with what their plans are?

PROTIP: THEY SPENT $16,000 ON THEIR OWN ENTERTAINMENT. $16,000.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Another question: if your 30$ or whatever it is (I haven't bought anything yet but I will) DOES just go to line the pockets of the creators of invisiblechildren, what are you out? Only 30$.

and what are they in? only 8 million? pfff, no big deal. just 8mill.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

And if for some odd reason, this charity group is *gasp*, doing what it's say they're going to do, you've just helped an entire country.The cost/benefit ratio is just so wide, I don't see how you can condone the Kony 2012 movement if you care about the situation at all.

maybe because i want to do something that actually gets shit done instead of saying MOM CAN I SEE YOUR DEBIT CARD I WANNA SPEND $30 ON THIS BOX AND THEN SAY I HELPED. I HELPED. I'M HELPING MOM.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Another thing, this situation is not 'just another terrorist' because it is kids that are in this army.

KIDS MAKE THE SITUATION 100X MORE DIRE. LIFE HOLDS MORE VALUE IF YOU ARE BELOW THE AGE OF 10. YEP. I appreciate that it's horrible what he's doing, but life holds equal meaning regardless of age.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Secondly, because this army is full of kids who don't choose to be in it, you are far less likely to have it get remade, or for the kids to regroup, once the leader(s) of it are captured. If you're concerned that simply capturing Kony won't do anything, the #2 person on the list was also Ugandan, probably a second in command. I find it hard to believe they wouldn't go after all the leaders of this atrocious army at once.

has it ever occurred to you that disbanding the army isn't the goal so much as it is making sure the dude who had this idea in the first place is taken away.
has it also occurred to you that, where Kony to be found and his home(s) raided, these warrior-children would be killed on sight by the forces? no matter what happens, these kids are d-e-a-d.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

But regardless that, you know, al-qaeda is actually wrong and should be stamped out, that is a separate issue from this terrorist situation. To think that just because you can't fix anything with the world, that you shouldn't try and fix 1 thing, is pretty defeatist. Why don't you just kill yourself now, you're going to die sometime anyways.

shut up.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Oh, and if you think that should be doing something else to stop Kony, why don't you go out and do it? Oh, is that because you would need not only yourself but a well-funded, lawful, focussed organization to get the job done? Isn't that exactly what this movement is creating??

that's not what it's creating. it's creating a job for a bunch of people who saw an opportunity to capitalize on the eagerness of society to latch onto a cause to abolish their white guilt or whatever. there are plenty of things the everyday person can do to help with this that don't involve giving some asshat $30 because they had a good idea to make a quick buck.

Y'ALL NIGAHS DUMB