Only that last paragraph was actually useful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reincarnate
I'd absolutely love to meet a doctor or scientist who has read "thousands of books" claim to agree with the sort of retarded economic logic you've tried to invoke in this thread. What kind of crap are they reading -- the Bible?
|
Not at all. One subject has nothing to do with the other.
Strangely, though, you compared that system to socialism and communism, which were both very "non religious" systems, as far as I'm concerned.
At least try to keep your insults coherent, otherwise you're the one who'll look like a troll.
Quote:
|
Your system has already been "experienced before" and we understand the economic implications well. You simply just *do not understand the basics yet.* It makes you sound like a complete asshole when you try to defend something that is clearly flawed for a variety of reasons you either ignore or circumvent. You can't just back out and say "I made a mistake that everything was free" when that's the entire thrust of this thread and debate.
|
I can say that I made a mistake when I see I did. You clearly don't seem to have the same capacity.
No, it hasn't been experienced before, at least not in the way I suggested, because it's not the same as socialism. It's not anywhere nearly as absurd as you made it seem, either. Inflation and costs would be managed differently, that's all.
The suggested system wasn't even ready, I was trying to start building something that could be plausible, an alternative to the current system. Regardless of who's right, I know you won't accept this possibility.