[Etylukah]

I don't understand this debate. In my head it's like you were asking me if it was right to be white or black except that instead of talking about race we're talking about a mindset generated by genes. I mean, we don't have control of what happens to us before we were born, why should some people be penalized for it?

I don't exactly believe in this type of right and wrong too. I just think that there's actions that creates consequences.
Something right or wrong should be about what you do and what you don't do, not something you are or not.
Otherwise Cavernio pretty much explained the other right/wrong aspect possibilities. (but it's typically more a moral aspect than rational which is also important)

You could be born as a pedophile, if you manage to not do any actions that would creates "wrong" consequences you should be fine regardless.
I'm just failing to comprehend what could be wrong with homosexuality from an impartial/rational point of view. It seems to be more a question of morals/ethics.. and even there, it would still be more right than wrong. I guess society in general just need more time to adjust?