[dore]

Originally Posted by Mollocephalus

"Like to" isn't a very good approach when talking about moral matters, especially when it obscures what you actually know and what you don't.

Why not? If you're looking at something you cannot either prove or disprove, why shouldn't personal fancy be a viable choice? Now it's one thing to try to "prove" heaven and hell or the Bible or whatever like some of the idiots in this thread, but since he just mentioned his personal beliefs in without saying anyone else's is wrong, what's wrong with that?