06-8-2008, 01:11 PM
|
#8
|
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,302
|
Re: Hey, what's the most retarded movie of all time? What's it about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lxDestinyxl
Alright, maybe not the most retarded, but it's definitely not a good movie.
Reasons:
1) Headache
2) The camcorder holding dude took too long to die
3) The camcorder was picked up by someone else and gave me a headache again
4) Too long of an introduction, even though it was realistic
5) Just because the camcorder broke down, it didn't mean it would randomly pick a previously recorded flick and start playing it again
6) The movie was too short
7) The monster was really dodgy
8) The plot itself - there was no plot
9) Headache
10) Headache
11) There wasn't really anything to-the-point in the duration of the movie
12) We couldn't guess what was happening to everyone else - therefore the camera was too focused on the un-important sections
13) In the subway - boring
14) Many people mention -hidden things- in the movie, or -the REAL monster is blah blah blah- . If these are true, and you need to look at the finer details to find these, then it's not a good movie. A good movie should have something smart/hidden etc... but not too disguised otherwise no-one's going to understand it and get bored.
15) The worst ending created by man
16) The plot in the beginning with the Japan trip had absolutely nothing to do with the movie itself
17) The movie was such a cliche'
18) Headache
|
Cloverfield was a good movie.
anyone who got a headache is obviously waaaaay to sensitive.
Also, I have never seen anything like cloverfield before, the camera was genius.
Last edited by sjoecool1991; 06-8-2008 at 01:14 PM..
|
|
|