04-29-2004, 11:40 AM
|
#26
|
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Forum lurking like the crazy I am
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chardish
If you start changing the definition of marriage, who knows where it'll stop.
Allow #$* marriage, and by 2100 polygamy, beastiality and incest will be legally recognized relationships.
|
Grr...you stole my arguement. But yeah, I totally agree on that. Things need to be more Black/White when it comes to politics and especially on the topic of marriage. The concept should be recognized along traditional lines because tampering with the idea of a life union between two people has a high risk of people thinking that homosexual marriage is an offense to their beliefs or practices, beliefs which in themselves are a very defining part of society. So if homosexual marriage is endorsed by the government there's too much risk of unrest, more than usual I mean.
The economy will love homosexual marriage because of more joint taxes, but the people who are active in their religious practice will hate it.
__________________
Guess who's back!
|
|
|