Flash Flash Revolution - View Single Post - Neo-Christianity.

VxDx · 04-24-2004, 10:44 PM

Firstly, please do not bring special relativity and time dilation into a discussion of creation. Relativistic theories are based on distinct frames of reference. "in the beginning" there would have only been one (that of god). Furthermore, whatever point you could show would just be speculation anyways, so it may as well just be left out altogether. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that you can't show anything with physics...

Secondly, I find it interesting that you can find so many flaws with christianity and yet you, unlike most, do not loose your faith completely. It's odd that you cite physics, which I consider to be almost the polar opposite of religion, as a support for your own "neo-christianity".

finally, citing spelling as a proof of a grievous lack of intelligence is pretty ignorant. people type fast, and people don't want to be 100% correct all the time.

04-24-2004, 10:44 PM	#8
VxDx FFR Player Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,871	Firstly, please do not bring special relativity and time dilation into a discussion of creation. Relativistic theories are based on distinct frames of reference. "in the beginning" there would have only been one (that of god). Furthermore, whatever point you could show would just be speculation anyways, so it may as well just be left out altogether. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that you can't show anything with physics... Secondly, I find it interesting that you can find so many flaws with christianity and yet you, unlike most, do not loose your faith completely. It's odd that you cite physics, which I consider to be almost the polar opposite of religion, as a support for your own "neo-christianity". finally, citing spelling as a proof of a grievous lack of intelligence is pretty ignorant. people type fast, and people don't want to be 100% correct all the time.