![]() |
THE BATTLE OF THE BRAIN!!!!!!!!
Post your thoughts on the testing on animals for potentially harmful products.
|
I think that if they can spend enough money to get the rights to test the dangerous products on animals that they should fucking build a computer that you can test them on.
|
Would you rather test it on humans? I saw a report on this back in grade 8, they said that they hardly ever test on dogs or cats if anyone can feel better about that. But particually harmful products do have their uses and it needs to be tested. It may seem cruel but if it's not done to animals it would be done to people, perhaps you.
|
speaking of testing on animals, did you know that the majority of first aid came from testing on Jews by the nazis (for example: what temp does skin burn, how to treat it, all kinds of shit)
|
i think they should test the products on criminals
it'd be all "I wonder if this horribly dangerous bomb works" "lets test it on the democrats!" |
True Lupin. I read a story of a woman who had a baby, and the 'doctor' there instructed a guard to watch her, and make sure she didn't feed it at all. He wanted to see how long a newborn baby would last without any food. In a strange show of caring however, the guard turned away after two days and let the woman smother the baby so it wouldn't suffer. Kinda sad, really.
And about the animal testing thing...it would depend on what animals they were testing, and if it was harmful or not. I mean, if they're testing how many shotgun blasts a chimp can take, obviously no. I even feel its wrong to test lipsticks and such on animals, which they like to do. But if its for medical or serious purposes...for instance, doctors just recently discovered how to extract a gene that allows the backbone to heal if snapped. They broke rat's backs, gave them a vaccine, set the bone and the rats were able to walk again. Studies like that, ones for the common good of people, I feel are okay. |
I too agree that it should be tested on criminals. But not democrats.
But the problem is the whole "cruel and unusually punishment jazz". |
we should do tests on stupid people...because they are so stupid, any effect from the product will make them like smarter or something
|
Quote:
yeah I was kidding about the democrats and cruel and unusual punishment my ass plus....it would set an example You do the crime.....you get products tested on you *insert catchy slogan here* |
God, I write out something thoughtful and you're talking about nuking democrats...well, I can play that game.
derr...I like cookies. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I styill think we should test it on humans |
LMFAO!!!!!
|
Bahahaha stupid Clinton.
And what the hell does Yogurt have to do with anything? |
nothing its just..........random yogurt
lets not get off topic now....*smirk* |
OK Why not test them on incurable people with fatal diseases??
|
because.....if you test like medicine on them they are already to weak to react to it....or they might have some bodily deformities
|
true true hmmm why not alternateoblivion then????
|
Quote:
|
No...lets test everything on him
![]() and back to the abnormality thing.....people with diseases like that may die more easily as a result of a product.......normal people might survive and be fine |
Man bean you are evil
|
how about instead of a death sentence, prisoners can choose to exploit themself to the good of non fatal science experimentation and be allowed to live or something... i dont know...
|
omg, bean i can't stop laughing........you are sooooo random
|
Ahh too late
i like cheese test it on humans... |
well.. human testingis acceptable in some cases... they put adds in the paper for testing some kind of new pill all the time.. everyone knows the old.. get 6 people give three of them placebos and the othre 3 the new medicine.. that human testing... but for more complex and life threatening things i would agree on animal testings.. my reason is simple..
lets say they are testing on rabbits.. the ratio from rabbits to people is probably about 3:1(this is not scientific just a guess)..based on those numbers and the reproduction rate of rabbits.. it could easily be 5:1 within a year.. and then 10:1 within the next year.. and continually growing.. agreed that nautre will take its course and will only support as much life as it can before it equals itself out again.. why not use the animals for testing.. ( I dont know where im going with this.. )... but this all goes to those animal rights activists.. i dont understand these people.. they all same the same thing.. save the animals... yea.. lets se how much your saying that with you have a 3 hundered pund lion about to punce you and eat your heart out... lets see.. shoot the lion save yourself.. or let the lion kill you because he's only looking for food and he doesn't know any better.. hmm.. live or die... i would choose live.. but then i would be the center of a mass uprising about how people are barbarians.. NOW this ties into vegetarians.. did you know that vegans (true vegans that don't any type of animal product) have to take pills to get all the nutrients and vitamins they need to live?.. oh yea.. pill popping.. very natural way of life... i just dont understand some people.. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution