Flash Flash Revolution: Community Forums

Flash Flash Revolution: Community Forums (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/index.php)
-   TWG Archives (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread] (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=149562)

inDheart 08-22-2018 08:31 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YoshL (Post 4642882)
Votes from post 5 to post 1208
It is night

---
Final vote count, if you see anything wrong about this, please tell me privately

lets just make it easy and actually look at the postcounts

Precarious 08-22-2018 08:31 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Just thought I'd point out that Blind isn't town.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Funnygurl555 (Post 4644077)
I think a post like this is pretty organic and comes from a good perspective.

The problem is, his overall performance is far, far from organic. No one seems to have really considered what I said yesterday, so I'll reiterate my case against Blind.

Yesterday, I made a series of posts when I got back, one of which included a suggestion by me that we didn't know how many wolves there are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precarious (Post 4643445)
But then this happens. It's extremely unlikely that anyone could possibly guess everyone from the dataless mess of D1—we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are for example.

Emphasis on we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are.

As several people (DBP at length, Freezin and Sun Fan a bit) alluded to—see #1722—this was incorrect. All T tables include three wolves. My confusion came from the fact the the mafiascum wiki table differed from the official game table. I was reading the former when I made that claim, which led to what DBP characterized as a dumbtell.

Blind claims that he hadn't read the long discussion about that when he commented on the post. But that's very hard to believe. You see, he reacted with extremely exaggerated concern

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4643514)
What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What.

likely trying to scope out an aggressive position on a topic (that he didn't actually understand) in order to simulate town cred.

The problem is, he immediately undercut his own reading. Not only did he misunderstand what had actually happened, but his reaction upon being caught showed that the excessive “What” post was fake.

Note the following:

My initial response:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precarious (Post 4643518)
People have already gone over this. I looked at the link in the OP instead of the spoiler again and assumed that the different scum totals would carry over.

His response to that:

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4643522)
This is flimsy at best. Only the top 2 have one less wolf. (6 and 7 T's.) I get the chances, but I highly doubt we rolled that.

This is hilariously problematic. Blind makes the same mistake I did, obviously reading from the mafiascum tables. This would be funny on its own, calling out someone for a dumbtell, then making the same dumbtell. But it's more than that, because it reveals his reaction to my post was artificially constructed. There's no need to go “What what what...” or indeed to even react at all if this was his actually understanding of the situation. If he believed what he claimed here, then my initial statement (we don't know how many wolves there are) would have been mechanically valid, and there would have been no reason to jump on it because it was correct.

Instead, by jumping all over it, he commits to the idea that there's something wrong with it. But he very clearly, as demonstrated by the post above, doesn't understand what. Rather, he saw that other people, primarily DBP, had discussed it at length, and saw an opportunity to scope out unclaimed case ground rather than actually making a case. Not only does this speak to a lack of actual scumhunting—looking for a unique position rather than a position supported by evidence—it clashes directly with his claim that he hadn't read further on, and was simply reacting to my post. If that was the case, why the initial overreaction. After all, “I get the chances.”

This interpretation of Blind is borne out by his later responses.

First, I pointed out the obvious problem with his post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precarious (Post 4643533)
...

You're kidding, right? They went on a whole tangent about it being a dumbtell, then you act like it a sudden brilliant discovery you made--and then you make the same dumbtell? There aren't variable mafia numbers. That was their point (I'll admit it took me longer than it should have to figure out what the problem was). The mafiascum link includes a T..TT..TTT etc. set-up with different wolf numbers, but that's not the case here (YoshL's T-rolls spoiler is different than the mafiascum page). There are three wolves in every configuration. The only question is whether or not there's a serial killer.

To those actually following the discussion—who had commented on it and understood what the dumbtell was—this remark made sense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreezinIce (Post 4643536)
Lol blind

How embarressing

His initial reaction is to explain away his misreading as an immediate hot take to my initial post, although as I've demonstrated that's problematic because by his understanding there was nothing to react to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4643539)
Yeah, so i react to posts when i read them. I don't quote to use later and finish the thread and then write an entire novel to each of them.

It's weak, get over it.

Where Blind really undermines himself is in his reaction to Freezin's casual response.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4643540)
What is?

Blind doesn't understand what's embarrassing because he still doesn't realize that he committed the same dumbtell. He read into my statement what he wanted to read, missing the actual point—a point that was necessary to understand in order for his original post (What what what...) to make any sense at all.

Every single post he made in this sequence drives home the fact that he didn't understand what was wrong with what I said initially, which not only shows that his criticism of it was falsely constructed, but that his extreme reaction was as well. It would be one thing to make a passing remark regarding the "how many mafia" thing, another entirely to do what he did.

blindreper1179

FreezinIce 08-22-2018 08:34 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Oh so that's what you've been doing

Celirra 08-22-2018 08:39 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
did the quotes and the argument not line up very well for anyone else?

YoshL 08-22-2018 08:42 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Votes from post 1861 to post 2164
Night in 26:19:03

---
  • Votes -- Lynch -- Voters
  • 1 -- Xiz -- the sun fan (60)
  • 1 -- inDheart -- FreezinIce (37)
  • 1 -- blindreper1179 -- Precarious (1)
  • 1 -- unvote -- Celirra (95)
  • 5 -- not voting -- blindreper1179 (17), Funnygurl555 (16), inDheart (30), Tps222 (5), Xiz (42)

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 08:46 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Sure, mass claiming sounds fun. Vt here for the 142577425785th time.

I didn't dumb tell on the wolf number pre, i was saying at 6/7, which i missed 5, would be 2 wolves IF we were using wiki, but we're not, and i doubt we rolled 6/7. 5 may be possible, but ehhhh.


You're wasting your time trying to construe my words honestly.

FreezinIce 08-22-2018 08:46 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Celirra (Post 4644590)
did the quotes and the argument not line up very well for anyone else?

I'm not parsing it very well.

I think he's saying that blind is faking not knowing about the dumbtell?

Celirra 08-22-2018 08:54 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
why do blind and prec only exist when the other exists
zzzzz

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 08:58 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Celirra (Post 4644603)
why do blind and prec only exist when the other exists
zzzzz

Ummm. Did you not see me at day start? Have you not seen me through out the day? That was pres literal first post of the day.


And you talk about only using examples to push a motive... :eyeroll:

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 09:00 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
So TTTRRK. So... we're missing one letter right?

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 09:01 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Or does vanilla not mean a T for certain?

the sun fan 08-22-2018 09:04 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4644616)
Or does vanilla not mean a T for certain?

It depends on what you're saying by this, but there is always at least 3 vanilla towns.

the sun fan 08-22-2018 09:05 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
I hardclaim vt btw

Celirra 08-22-2018 09:06 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4644612)
Ummm. Did you not see me at day start? Have you not seen me through out the day? That was pres literal first post of the day.


And you talk about only using examples to push a motive... :eyeroll:

It's mostly just what first came to mind timing wise tbh
You're not wrong

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 09:06 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by the sun fan (Post 4644622)
It depends on what you're saying by this, but there is always at least 3 vanilla towns.

Im saying with the flips it's TTT. But if there is always 3 vts, then those could be moot for the role queue.

Celirra 08-22-2018 09:07 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
I am the ideal ice cream flavour eh

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 09:07 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Celirra (Post 4644630)
I am the ideal ice cream flavour eh

You're superman?

Celirra 08-22-2018 09:09 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
i didn't know people actually liked superman flavoured ice cream

my mind is blowing

Precarious 08-22-2018 09:10 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4644593)
Sure, mass claiming sounds fun. Vt here for the 142577425785th time.

I didn't dumb tell on the wolf number pre, i was saying at 6/7, which i missed 5, would be 2 wolves IF we were using wiki, but we're not, and i doubt we rolled 6/7. 5 may be possible, but ehhhh.


You're wasting your time trying to construe my words honestly.

You quoted me as follows:

Originally Posted by Precarious View Post
we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are for example.

and responded with

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindreper1179 (Post 4643514)
What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What.

48 Whats suggests you found something really, really objectionable about that statement. And yet you couldn't identify what was obviously wrong about it, as I've pointed out, repeatedly. Probably to the point that people are getting tired of reading it.

If I'm correctly interpreting your word salad above, you're now trying to argue that you knew we weren't using the wiki, yet felt the need to criticize me even though you knew I thought that? That's not terribly believable.

Quote:

You're wasting your time trying to construe my words honestly.
lol that Freudian slip

blindreper1179 08-22-2018 09:15 PM

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Precarious (Post 4644636)
You quoted me as follows:

Originally Posted by Precarious View Post
we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are for example.

and responded with



48 Whats suggests you found something really, really objectionable about that statement. And yet you couldn't identify what was obviously wrong about it, as I've pointed out, repeatedly. Probably to the point that people are getting tired of reading it.

If I'm correctly interpreting your word salad above, you're now trying to argue that you knew we weren't using the wiki, yet felt the need to criticize me even though you knew I thought that? That's not terribly believable.



lol that Freudian slip

Idk what freudian is, but yoshl made it VERY clear that the T roles were updated in OP. Yet you went to the wiki. Not my fault you don't pay attention. You're still wasting your time, and i'm done wasting my time. Try to find anything else if i'm such a wolf bro, come get me. Otherwise, write your pre meditated novels about someone else.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution