Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728746)

my main problem with MML is their behavior not matching their claims
it doesn't make sense to me that MML "forgets" to have roleblocked me, especially when they suggested that they thought they might have blocked leetic instead, who has openly claimed a 1x check anyway
MML's coming back into the thread looks very coordinated with DBP, especially given how they interact with each other after that
if MML is town I think dbp claiming roleblocker should actually make them more suspicious of DBP since the setup can't have 2 town roleblockers
combine that with the massive tonal gap of pre-claim MML with post-claim MML and you have a faker

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4728747)

If anyone blocked Xiz or MML N1, claim now.

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728749)

basically, dbp knows I can't have a red check on them because they roleblocked me night 2, unless they had been roleblocked
so, dbp needs a partner to also claim to have roleblocked me night 1, since MML hypoblocked me night 1, they used MML to try bolstering the claim believability and circumventing the "dbp was roleblocked" scenario
they know their best shot at surviving is flipping me today and try to argue that dbp wasn't actually checked, so the only way to do that is to double claim and then try to win the counterclaims in lylo. Fortunately they played it badly enough where they look suspicious anyway, so massclaim tomorrow should lead you guys to lynch them anyway. Good luck

Originally Posted by ShadoWolfe (Post 4728752)

If there was gonna be another roleblocker claim, it would've happened.

There's def a wolf blocker

Originally Posted by ShadoWolfe (Post 4728751)

I see where you're coming from on parts of this.

How do you rationalize them as partners?

and why can't there be two town role blockers?


I'm more interested in my first question than my 2nd so please do give that one decent attention

Originally Posted by Duskfall (Post 4728733)

Mikey scum world: you didn't realise dbp was roleblocker

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728749)

basically, dbp knows I can't have a red check on them because they roleblocked me night 2, unless they had been roleblocked
so, dbp needs a partner to also claim to have roleblocked me night 1, since MML hypoblocked me night 1, they used MML to try bolstering the claim believability and circumventing the "dbp was roleblocked" scenario
they know their best shot at surviving is flipping me today and try to argue that dbp wasn't actually checked, so the only way to do that is to double claim and then try to win the counterclaims in lylo. Fortunately they played it badly enough where they look suspicious anyway, so massclaim tomorrow should lead you guys to lynch them anyway. Good luck

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728756)

I definitely have a better pov on the first question than you, just trying to figure out the most convincing way to explain it, because apparently whenever I try to lay out basic logic instead of shouting my opinion people still don't listen

Originally Posted by ShadoWolfe (Post 4728764)

Try me. I'm not "people" lol I feel we've communicated enough to know how to understand each other so just type it out

Shouting your opinion won't get you anywhere here

Originally Posted by ShadoWolfe (Post 4728764)

Try me. I'm not "people" lol I feel we've communicated enough to know how to understand each other so just type it out

Shouting your opinion won't get you anywhere here

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728768)

it's the play they have to make because dbp knows I don't have a check

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4728768)

it's the play they have to make because dbp knows I don't have a check

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4728770)

Does that mean you're rescinding your claim?