Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726087)

If Bolth/Duskfall are wolves, they made it very clear that they don't want to win.

I think it's easier to assume that this is bait.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726228)

:clap:

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726091)

The ideal play here is to do the above as town and realize that both sides were T/T to PoE into a wolf vote later on because the more you find towns, the smaller the wolf pool becomes.

tl;dr: Chaos is great, but it has to be done right.

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726232)

Except that even that theory is wrong because they were all here 30 minutes before that time at the very exact same second except Ulli who got here like 2 minutes later.

Originally Posted by XelNya (Post 4726166)

the fuck you think I've been doing poking lar

he just doesn't want to engage me because he knows he'd lose

Originally Posted by Ulleabhara (Post 4726178)

I do agree that lynching inactives is generally a good strategy (the information they're NOT giving the town is counteracted by their flip and the fact that we no longer have them as a distraction/easy out for wolves in later Days), and am generally inclined to lynch. My interpretation of Hakulyte's no-lynch advocacy strikes me as concerned town that has been burned by some bad past games. (Honestly, Haku, I feel like the solution to that particular conundrum is just for the PRs to play smarter.)

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726190)

We've already got to the point where people are suggesting we lynch inactives. Nice. I still have yet to see a game in which lynching an inactive in D1 was a good idea.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726235)

really? did you see this yourself? at any rate I wouldn't trust the bottom tab but it's good to know if it's true I guess

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726102)

Yeah actually lets just discuss this now

I know when someone doesn't show at all (not saying DBP will do this, but it's happened a few times) everyone tries to avoid dealing with the slot because "lol it'll get replaced"


We've had that kind of shit blow up in our face enough times to not do it again yeah?

Like it's d0, we gonna probably miss anyway. if someone legit is under 5 posts then instead of the long parade of replacements that also need replacing we should just clear up the slots and not wait until MYLO this time

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726237)

Look at the timestamp of the posts. They legit all popped in the same 5-10 seconds. I was in the middle of previewing one of my posts when it happened.

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726103)

I'm seriously considering no lynch D0 because I think it will help PRs stay in the game longer and do more night actions.

Originally Posted by jessiebessie (Post 4726107)

Tbh I’m not a huge fan of hunting inactives. I’d rather execute someone based on information (even if it’s minimal information) rather than a lack thereof.

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726209)

The active townies would be killed off by scum anyway, leaving the active wolves to keep picking off easy targets. Trust me, I've been there before.

Originally Posted by XelNya (Post 4726113)

Hi my name is lar, I’m going to get my town read for the day by not thinking, please town read me, see look, I’m voting like I always do: without rhyme or reason.

Did I mention you should town read me for poking lar like this?

You should! I always do this. I always flip town.

I am town, read me as town please.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726242)

we have this talk every game it feels like
.

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726115)

I used to play like that, but it never really helped me much.

Even info can be detrimental if a player wasn't going in the right direction.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726245)

I'm at the point where all advocating for inactive lynch is NAI-- MML is doing a good thing by pushing it, but there's no town points there anymore

if he doesn't put UP on top of that, he's suspicious

Originally Posted by Xiz (Post 4726112)

bad idea. if you are town this methodology is anti-town.

No-lynch is only good in a final 4 situation

Originally Posted by Bolth mannn (Post 4726248)

Listening to my gut, I don’t want to vote for haku or MML this phase

Dbp, dusk and ffa are also trending towards town for me

Everyone else is fair game tbh

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726249)

There was never town points in it lmao
Ive neen mislynched for pushing it before I'm pretty sure, although that was a good ways back

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726247)

"I used to play like that. It never helped."

"hey guys let's no-lynch this phase."

B R U H
r
U
H

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726253)

more that I don't think you're necessarily going through the motions because "town Lar does it", more that "Lar does it, period"

Originally Posted by Duskfall (Post 4726122)

Have you ever come out of tryharding a scum game where you have to fake reads and then roll town and you no longer care about faking reads because you are town anyways so you just don't bother trying to solve the game at all?

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726256)

Animal Crossing game had 5 town PRs.
All five of them outed themselves and communicated 0 mechanical information that could have helped town win the game.

In the nonary game, town almost lynched a PR D0. (FFA)

I don't feel like it's too far fetched to try to have one game where PRs doesn't set themselves on fire.

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726124)

I've never rolled scum, wouldn't know

Originally Posted by Xiz (Post 4726125)

I see what you are saying, but this is still a huge mistake.

Killing town and misslynching is better then getting no new information. Always. Otherwise we only get new information from wolves (or in this game, potentially a SK)


no-lynching is only good if its not final 4, final 6, etc. End of story.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726222)

do you think the "Seriously though, I don't like the way Duskfall walked it back on his last post." is something that a wolf Ulle would emphasize here?

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726261)

if I'm being real I don't even remember what scum flashflash feels like

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726256)

Animal Crossing game had 5 town PRs.
All five of them outed themselves and communicated 0 mechanical information that could have helped town win the game.

In the nonary game, town almost lynched a PR D0. (FFA)

I don't feel like it's too far fetched to try to have one game where PRs doesn't set themselves on fire.

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726263)

Sure, why not? An easy enough reason to appear suspicious.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726261)

if I'm being real I don't even remember what scum flashflash feels like

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726131)

Well, there's a world where mislynching a town can help the Vigi shoot a wolf.

So, I guess there's that at least.

Originally Posted by Bolth mannn (Post 4726268)

Ffa is your scum lean on psycho just because they’re inactive or?

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726266)

Completely besides the point Haku

If PRs are being inactive then they're playing badly and it's kinda outta my hand. I aint giving wolves cover and fucking town over late game for the nth time just because my PRs decided not to play the game. Thats taking a shit situation and then throwing it in a child's potty chair hoping it smells better

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726269)

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726272)

He's either wrong as sin or lying but Ive played with him being wolf before. Teamed with Funny and an inactive that was replaced 3 times eeuuuufffhhhhsh some new guy from another website

If he 180s a hard stance to agree with you and then tries to move the conversation along he's a wolf.

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726150)

we should lynch the top poster because that gives us the most info


logic

Originally Posted by Hakulyte (Post 4726275)

Same could be said for wolves. They just need to be active enough to not be at the bottom chain of the inactive train and they can watch townies die for free.

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726277)

you're right, we should lynch inactives

what do you think about the whole ~weirdness~ between the fourwolfypopins

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726276)

This coming with a case or you just salty that i didnt agree with you?

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726281)

"four"???

Originally Posted by Bolth mannn (Post 4726157)

yea its kinda frustrating

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726284)

yeah, uli/leetic/psycho/someone else I'd have to check

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726277)

you're right, we should lynch inactives

what do you think about the whole ~weirdness~ between the fourwolfypopins

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726286)

no I get it now, I thought you alluded to a 4-wolf team

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726274)

why does this read stick out to you if you don't mind me asking

Originally Posted by psychoangel691 (Post 4726167)

Does this mean I should vote me? Or is there actually someone with 0 posts lol

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726288)

I mean, aren't there 4 wolves

Originally Posted by Bolth mannn (Post 4726289)

You only have 2 scum leans, quite a few nulls. Wondering specifically why psycho is a scum lean when they’ve only made 2 posts that really aren’t indicative of anything

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726285)

why is it frustrating to you? I don't see a lot of scumhunting with you

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726280)

When that starts actually happening I'll address it then

Until then we'll agree to disagree I guess

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726283)

276 just doesn't look good to me. I don't see a town getting all riled up for that reason and it seems like someone trying to fake an emotional reaction.

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726292)

uh aren't there variable number of wolves in this game??? it is for c++ at least

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726291)

dwdw I'm totally kidding

I would never dumbtell
that's completely outside of my range

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726298)

Cool. State a case when you vote next time please

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726300)

my mental voice for FFA is just a 24-hour C-tone

I can't tell if you're ever changing your affect

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726295)

I mean, psychoangel has a point - despite all the discussion about inactives, no one here is actually AFKing.

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar (Post 4726266)

Completely besides the point Haku

If PRs are being inactive then they're playing badly and it's kinda outta my hand. I aint giving wolves cover and fucking town over late game for the nth time just because my PRs decided not to play the game. Thats taking a shit situation and then throwing it in a child's potty chair hoping it smells better

Originally Posted by Ulleabhara (Post 4726178)

be right back to read the last ζ(3)-ish pages

Originally Posted by leetic (Post 4726301)

...So that's it? No pushback at all?

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726257)

3) DaBackpack-null
2) Bolth mannn-town lean
3) Hakulyte-town
4) flashflash account- town
5) Funnygurl555- null
6) jessiebessie-town lean
7) Ulleabhara- null
8) psychoangel691- scum lean
9) leetic- scum lean
10) Xiz- null
11) XelNya- town lean
12) MixMasterLar- null
13) Duskfall- town

Originally Posted by flashflash account (Post 4726306)

time for a fun game

I'm actually gonna make popcorn tonight, assuming MML and leetic are still going (and why wouldn't they be tbh)

Originally Posted by Funnygurl555 (Post 4726183)

thanks man

(also a total sidenote 'cause i'm so happy i've rediscovered chriddof. look at this shit. this is an entire video


i used to cry laughing at this shit)

Originally Posted by DaBackpack (Post 4726307)

I mean what is he supposed to say, you've given us nothing