Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

OK that makes more sense there

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

No, I talk to people who talk to me. I don't start convos, so only my neighbor was my ootc chatting besides shit posting in the discord.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Charu

These crops are like, disgustingly (yet incredibly) lewd.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

My neighbor got mad because i didn't exactly say what and how we got there. I don't want to put words in their mouths. Not copy pasting is hard lol

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@fatffuck

Idk, that's normal Xiz shenanigans, so idk what to do with it. Imo, if he's claiming vt, but is actually pr, and needs to die even once to activate it. Is that a town power? Wolf power? I don't think he'd push this hard as wolf to out himself. I think he'd be more innuendoing to get lynched. It's odd that he's solely spoke about lynching and not night killed. We obviously had more than one death.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

Ok so here's how I think this will play out (despite theorycrafting & wagonomics):


blindreper, your partner is the most sus and deserves the highest scum read in the game right now.

So does Ben, but admittedly a scum lean in comparison to your partner.

I wouldn't be surprised if Subaru was killed off just for talking about information regarding the graph in the last phase, and wolves already had the game pieced together that there were multiple neighborhoods with 2 people each in them.

It would be incredible for town if wolves actually played like this, since rounding closer to mid-game/end-game we can pinpoint where neighborhoods started getting killed off, and notably mine and yours were killed off while the 2nd person is still in the main game.

Approaching this from a perspective where wolves had no idea that this 2nd game was going to happen, that means likely wolves are ones that just sent their neighbor to this game, thinking that they would die, and not be able to converse about it. They could make up whatever lie about whomever their neighbor was that they'd prefer, now they're stuck with that.

I think that everyone currently in this 'side' game, this 'afterlife', is town and no matter who we vote off, it's going to flip as town-aligned.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

If this is true, wolves shat their pants harder than townies when this mindfuck of a game turned around at the start of this day phase.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Charu

I wouldn't discredit the possibility for that being the reason that they died as well, just that sharing that info in a 1-on-1 OOTC has gotten me killed a lot faster in the past than making a stab about it in d0 semantics, and in all cases where that has happened to me, it was the person on the other side of the 1-on-1 conversation that put the bullet in me. I also don't know the extensiveness of the conversation had, so I'm just assuming that it's similar in length to the one I had with Ben.

Understandably brow furling intensifies if their neighbor is Storn, but their response d0 is pretty NAI. I can put this on the back burner, but I think the idea should at least be given some thought given:

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Reuben

I am also ok with chat logs being shared. These were written at a time where I thought the game setup might have been that there were sizable neighborhoods (more than 2) based on proximity of the graph, but we were 1 of maybe 2 smallest neighborhoods granted our position on the graph, and that there could've been upwards of 4 or 5 players in some neighborhoods.

I was not aware that it was 2 players per neighborhood across the board until Shadow_God mentioned the gamestate being that way. Wolves would definitely have known the game setup being the case.

Also omg I did it again w/ the crossposting someone end my life now

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@TWGma

It's fine to get a slightly different conclusion. I didn't take into account in my graph that circling could overlap, or that there might be some other arbitrary way of pairing people together in relation to the graph (other than distance), and didn't take into account players that are just not on the graph at all.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Shadow_God_10

No better way to get it wired than to attempt trying to.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Charu

see:

sorry if it was unclear, the answer is yes. During OOTC times.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@bugkid666

sick logic somersault

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Charu

Interesting thought, probably not lez see if it works

Charu

Is this a valid vote? wtb votecount.

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

@Charu

If Cel-Storn are neighbors, then it makes sense that Charu-blind are neighbors. Haven't really seen anything contradictory to the pairing approach plus the pressure on me over my logic behind who died and why, with the uneasiness of sharing neighbors makes this feel like it's rightly placed lol, sorry mate. Have to test it on someone /shrug

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

No valid votes have been cast

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

twgv]unvote[/twgv]

Re: ymotohciD :daerhT emaG 002 GWT
 

god I love breaking everything..

unvote