Flash Flash Revolution

Flash Flash Revolution (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/index.php)
-   TWG Archives (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread] (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=151769)

Xiz 03-8-2020 03:20 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

TWG Cherry 03-8-2020 03:21 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
I don't think maple's gimmick is wolfy either I just really hate it and wish it would stop what what

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:26 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry (Post 4717172)
The main idea is that lynching inactives help wolves in this specific setup because they just need to post like 2 times or more to be fine.
It's also making the acquisitioner's life harder by reducing their pool of targets.

So, I was wondering if being pro inactive would go against the wolf agenda and motivate them to defend the stance that inactives must be gone.

I'm curious about how others approach this.

Are you actually endorsing inactivity?

Im not going to snap vote you for this but

H O L Y


Somewhat related but i really don't see why the acquisitioner would ever take over an inactive

Either they have to maintain the inactivity in which case they risk randomly getting voted and killed or they go "oh hey im back and active" and we give them the stink eye.

In other words im not killing inactives to hurt the acquisitioner (because it doesn't). I'm doing it because they hurt town.

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:28 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xiz (Post 4717181)
Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

Oh

Guess i can do this now [twgv]flurry[twgv] good god that post i quoted was slimy

If dotty comes back last minute and does 5 quick posts to stay alive im voting them 100%

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:29 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xiz (Post 4717181)
Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

Oh dear, that's a game changer.

Molly to echo what Julian said.

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:29 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
flurry

Voting is hard

TWG Rolf 03-8-2020 03:29 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Dora (Post 4717178)
I dont think maples gimmick is wolfy

I hope that this is a general statement and not trying to be a response to me, as that'd make two different people now answering for Tank and that's not a good look.

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:34 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Dora (Post 4717187)
flurry

Voting is hard

Voting inactives should be like a backup plan when there's nothing else.

You can vote inactives all you want, but since they're not here to talk back it's leading to nothing.

So, even voting me here would be more interesting as I am here to answer back.

TWG Cherry 03-8-2020 03:34 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Oh I missed the minimum post thing what what

flurry then

TWG Cherry 03-8-2020 03:35 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:36 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Dora (Post 4717183)
Somewhat related but i really don't see why the acquisitioner would ever take over an inactive

It's easier to act like you're really that player since they didn't post as much.

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:37 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Rolf (Post 4717188)
I hope that this is a general statement and not trying to be a response to me, as that'd make two different people now answering for Tank and that's not a good look.

General statement, read animals on last page complaining about it and weighed in

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:38 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry (Post 4717191)
oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

TWG Cherry 03-8-2020 03:40 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry (Post 4717194)
If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

Surely there are better ways to get reads on people than posting something that's going to bring all the heat on you what what

Please do share what info this tactic has gained

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:41 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry (Post 4717189)
Voting inactives should be like a backup plan when there's nothing else.

You can vote inactives all you want, but since they're not here to talk back it's leading to nothing.

So, even voting me here would be more interesting as I am here to answer back.

Im going to have to ummmmmm HARD DISAGREE with ya there.

It doesn't feel good but it absolutely has to be done. Its a poisoned slot that gets worse thre farther the game goes. D0 is really thre only good time to kill inactives because its not like we have other solid leads.

But our goddess Isabelle is going to smite them so its moot.

What isn't moot is defending inactivity.

Im not cherry but what what?

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:41 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry (Post 4717191)
oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

You can lynch an entire village with these words.

TWG Dora 03-8-2020 03:42 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry (Post 4717194)
If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

Ahh i see it was all a part of your master plan to get the juicy reads

/s

TWG Cherry 03-8-2020 03:43 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry (Post 4717197)
You can lynch an entire village with these words.

It's weak as hell reasoning and I wanted more than that from ya what what

But do keep trying to turn this around on me

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:46 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry (Post 4717195)
Surely there are better ways to get reads on people than posting something that's going to bring all the heat on you what what

Please do share what info this tactic has gained

It helped me read you two which is really cool for me.

I feel like you two really want inactives to leave.

I think wolves would commit differently to something like this.

TWG Flurry 03-8-2020 03:48 PM

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 
So, I'll continue my master plan and ask you two what do you think of Julian voting Molly ?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution