03-7-2013, 11:55 PM | #5461 |
Rhythm game specialist.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
|
03-7-2013, 11:56 PM | #5462 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Yeah man, don't be talkin' smack to a god damn grizzly bear. YOU'LL SCARE IT AWAY!
|
03-7-2013, 11:58 PM | #5463 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Well realistically there's a real simple solution to this, no more new files for official tournaments. Just use what's in game. I personally hate that idea but it would make it fair to everyone.
|
03-7-2013, 11:59 PM | #5464 |
Rhythm game specialist.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
(ala 5th official, the worst official to man)
|
03-8-2013, 12:10 AM | #5465 |
tane orb
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
that's a terrible idea lmfao
|
03-8-2013, 12:11 AM | #5466 |
Rhythm game specialist.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
I think that's the reason why it was suggested, haha -- it's to emphasize that there's either one way, or no way.
|
03-8-2013, 12:13 AM | #5467 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Actually I was reminded of it when Carlos posted because before this one started he asked if it were really necessary to have new files for every tournament.
|
03-8-2013, 12:52 AM | #5468 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
You're just jumping to that solution because you refuse to even consider for a moment another. Calm down, take a step back, and put some thought into it. Also, I cannot take your challenge. It's not fair to the TB members to use the engine for my own means. I'm not that kind of person. I don't want to be that way. I won't be that way. I only respond to that challenge, because it's forced. I'd like to disregard it as nonsense though, which it is to me. But I don't think I can honestly argue my point with you all. I feel you're not taking it seriously or thinking about it in more ways than your own. It's 1 VS 100 or so here, and the odds of getting the victory, or my point across, is narrow. (1 VS 100 is not meant to be taken literally.) |
|
03-8-2013, 01:12 AM | #5469 |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Seriously why isn't middie banned.
Please give me a straight answer.
__________________
|
03-8-2013, 01:19 AM | #5470 | |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
General Rules - A.K.A Things Not To Do - Bait staff or other users; deliberately try to test site rules; By bring up a stale point regarding file submissions that Kayla and AJ have already repeatedly clarified, you are baiting FFR staff into an argument. Banworthy.
__________________
|
|
03-8-2013, 01:24 AM | #5471 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
You'd honestly have to ask the remaining staff at this point. I dropped all my mod titles and such.
|
03-8-2013, 01:38 AM | #5472 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
But arguments are where ideas sprout from, I would think!
Any who... where's ma' batch? Snivy demands it, if nothing else! |
03-8-2013, 02:05 AM | #5473 |
stepmania archaeologist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 34
Posts: 4,090
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
I still think we should hold more batches and accept less files per batch. Only the best files get accepted; and with less time between batches there's more of an incentive for people to improve their submitted files until they are amazing (and for people to keep stepping new stuff for FFR!). Sure, maybe it's more work for judges. But each batch *would* be smaller, and given how many people wait till the last few days to look at the files it doesn't seem like making time is that big of a problem. If it is, though, you can decrease the work by having one person go through first and see which files are obvious accepts/rejects.
__________________
Best AAA: Policy In The Sky [Oni] (81) Best SDG: PANTS (86) Best FC: Future Invasion (93) |
03-8-2013, 02:10 AM | #5474 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
The issue that always comes up in that type of situation is what's really considered an "amazing file." Most people have different views on what's good and enjoyable and what's not. I mean yeah there are some obvious things that we all know but where do we get the criteria for being amazing or perfect? We've all seen instances where one judge will rate a file extremely high and another extremely low.
|
03-8-2013, 03:17 AM | #5475 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,858
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Generally amazing and generally perfect
There are files that almost everyone agrees is a good file. Its not hard yo go through a batch prior to judging and pick out the terrible ones that had no chance to begin with |
03-8-2013, 07:21 AM | #5476 |
Dark Chancellor
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
how about judges be a tiny bit more strict and you people just deal with it
it's how it's always been and won't be likely to change any time soon.
__________________
|
03-8-2013, 09:08 AM | #5477 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
If FFR held a batch in the middle of a tournament to get a file, that wouldn't go over well at all. We'd have a bunch of people sending in shitty files, files that aren't hard enough/too hard, and it'd have to go through the judging process, ultimately postponing the tournament. And we all know how mad people can get over stupid shit (ie look at you and middie).
__________________
|
|
03-8-2013, 10:22 AM | #5478 | |
Rhythm game specialist.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
|
|
03-8-2013, 10:25 AM | #5479 | |
Dark Chancellor
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
__________________
|
|
03-8-2013, 10:56 AM | #5480 | |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
Granted... some judges will know who stepped what file due to people saying what they will step or they can tell from how they step... but perhaps that will eliminate ANY favoritism? On a side note: If this exists already, please let me know. I'm just unsure about this. Can there / Is there a list of people who can be tutors on how to step? Because I've been TRYING to step for half a year now, and can only really rely on batch notes, and the advice from people playing it.... but I could use some what to do / what not to do's I guess? (Granted... every file is different and its really an art form... I dunno... do you know what I'm getting at?) I guess I just wanna do a damn file correctly, and not sure how to ensure I do well :P
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|