TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

[Xiz]

Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

[TWG Cherry]

I don't think maple's gimmick is wolfy either I just really hate it and wish it would stop what what

[TWG Dora]

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry

The main idea is that lynching inactives help wolves in this specific setup because they just need to post like 2 times or more to be fine.
It's also making the acquisitioner's life harder by reducing their pool of targets.

So, I was wondering if being pro inactive would go against the wolf agenda and motivate them to defend the stance that inactives must be gone.

I'm curious about how others approach this.

Are you actually endorsing inactivity?

Im not going to snap vote you for this but

H O L Y


Somewhat related but i really don't see why the acquisitioner would ever take over an inactive

Either they have to maintain the inactivity in which case they risk randomly getting voted and killed or they go "oh hey im back and active" and we give them the stink eye.

In other words im not killing inactives to hurt the acquisitioner (because it doesn't). I'm doing it because they hurt town.

[TWG Dora]

Originally Posted by Xiz

Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

Oh

Guess i can do this now [twgv]flurry[twgv] good god that post i quoted was slimy

If dotty comes back last minute and does 5 quick posts to stay alive im voting them 100%

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by Xiz

Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

Oh dear, that's a game changer.

Molly to echo what Julian said.

[TWG Dora]

flurry

Voting is hard

[TWG Rolf]

Originally Posted by TWG Dora

I dont think maples gimmick is wolfy

I hope that this is a general statement and not trying to be a response to me, as that'd make two different people now answering for Tank and that's not a good look.

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by TWG Dora

flurry

Voting is hard

Voting inactives should be like a backup plan when there's nothing else.

You can vote inactives all you want, but since they're not here to talk back it's leading to nothing.

So, even voting me here would be more interesting as I am here to answer back.

[TWG Cherry]

Oh I missed the minimum post thing what what

flurry then

[TWG Cherry]

oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by TWG Dora

Somewhat related but i really don't see why the acquisitioner would ever take over an inactive

It's easier to act like you're really that player since they didn't post as much.

[TWG Dora]

Originally Posted by TWG Rolf

I hope that this is a general statement and not trying to be a response to me, as that'd make two different people now answering for Tank and that's not a good look.

General statement, read animals on last page complaining about it and weighed in

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry

oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

[TWG Cherry]

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry

If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

Surely there are better ways to get reads on people than posting something that's going to bring all the heat on you what what

Please do share what info this tactic has gained

[TWG Dora]

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry

Voting inactives should be like a backup plan when there's nothing else.

You can vote inactives all you want, but since they're not here to talk back it's leading to nothing.

So, even voting me here would be more interesting as I am here to answer back.

Im going to have to ummmmmm HARD DISAGREE with ya there.

It doesn't feel good but it absolutely has to be done. Its a poisoned slot that gets worse thre farther the game goes. D0 is really thre only good time to kill inactives because its not like we have other solid leads.

But our goddess Isabelle is going to smite them so its moot.

What isn't moot is defending inactivity.

Im not cherry but what what?

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry

oh hey flurry please explain your pro inactivity stance what what

it would be more interesting / should be a backup plan isn't good enough

You can lynch an entire village with these words.

[TWG Dora]

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry

If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

Ahh i see it was all a part of your master plan to get the juicy reads

/s

[TWG Cherry]

Originally Posted by TWG Flurry

You can lynch an entire village with these words.

It's weak as hell reasoning and I wanted more than that from ya what what

But do keep trying to turn this around on me

[TWG Flurry]

Originally Posted by TWG Cherry

Surely there are better ways to get reads on people than posting something that's going to bring all the heat on you what what

Please do share what info this tactic has gained

It helped me read you two which is really cool for me.

I feel like you two really want inactives to leave.

I think wolves would commit differently to something like this.

[TWG Flurry]

So, I'll continue my master plan and ask you two what do you think of Julian voting Molly ?