08-29-2012, 10:46 PM | #81 |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
"If you take the universe, everything we see -- stars and galaxies and clusters -- everything we see, if you get rid of it, the universe is essentially the same. We constitute a 1% bit of pollution in a universe that’s 30% dark matter and 70% dark energy. We are completely irrelevant. Why such a universe in which we are so irrelevant would be made for us is beyond me." -Lawrence Krauss
(from the video I linked earlier) |
08-29-2012, 11:21 PM | #82 |
Digital Dancing!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 80 billion club, NE
Age: 31
Posts: 12,980
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
My God, that banana video..
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5009540_sy...s-allergy.html These people weren't made by God. Spawn of the Devil, in fact.
__________________
Last edited by rushyrulz; 08-29-2012 at 11:23 PM.. |
08-29-2012, 11:56 PM | #83 | |
is against custom titles
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
::checks forum to make sure he's not in CT:: Nailed it. --Guido |
|
08-30-2012, 12:00 AM | #84 | |
ごめんなさい (/ω\)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 28
Posts: 2,290
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
Also if I were god I'd ragequit because everyone is fighting with each other over whether or not I exist. If you were god, would you like what you created? edit: lmao guido out of nowhere. |
|
08-30-2012, 09:00 AM | #85 | |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
If that were the case I wouldn't be much better than this guy: |
|
08-30-2012, 09:54 AM | #86 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: a galaxy far far away
Age: 33
Posts: 119
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
Also, fixes in bold. We knew that the sun revolved around the earth for a long time too based on the observations and tools available back then. The Bible is a book full of contradicting statements and obscure symbols that can be interpreted in many different ways. It was/is used to support the Crusades, the burning of "witches", slavery, and political slanderings for years. It also has a lot of pretty cool stuff in it, regardless of if you believe in God/Christ or not. In fact, many historians consider it to be a very important text for historical purposes. That being said, you cannot say that something that was said in The Bible was "utterly gutted" by science. I encourage you to read the first chapter of Genesis when the Bible discusses creation. The verses actually line up with the "proven" historical occurrences fairly well (minus the stars being created after the grass, I'll give you that one. Although this was written over 2000 years ago, sooo not so much was known about science, and it was generally believed that the sun revolved around the Earth at that time). Just because it says 7 days and lacks dinosaurs doesn't make it completely irrelevant, it just means people back then hadn't ever dug down into the earth looking for t-rex bones. 7 days is considered even by most Christians (minus some extremists) to be an entirely symbolic representation of the time frame. I know science says "_____ is probable/impossible because ______," but the Bible has to be considered with a different approach. It's just not a black and white text, regardless of what some groups may argue to the contrary. There are also a lot of crazy rules/laws in the Old Testament that many Christians today consider essentially irrelevant, but still acknowledge because of the historical context. People thought about a lot of things differently back then. I understand that a lot of people think many components of religion are hogwash, and quite frankly I won't argue against that, but I believe that the pros greatly outweigh the cons. You just have to remember that religion has a huuuuuge political side to it (thus, the Christian Dark Ages), and any time there are politics involved with anything, things will never run very efficiently. It was not Christianity that lead to the abolition of science at that time, it was the projection of Christianity by a few self-proclaimed righteous men who were actually just power-hungry greedy bastards. I've been a Christian for a long time, and I will be the very first to say that not all of us are the same. A Christian, as we are "supposed" to be, is about hearing other people out and helping where we can. We are meant to be servants, not "holier than thou" pricks that go around telling everybody what they're doing wrong and throwing a verse at anything that doesn't go how we want it to. And that's not even to mention "God said I should do this." That is THE most overly-used thought/statement in history, leading almost entirely to negative consequences. I completely understand why many people dislike Christianity. I think Ghandi's quote, "I like your Christ, I don't like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ" has held true for a very very long time. Anything in the news about Christianity is about some madmen protesting at funerals or burning copies of the Quran, yelling at their congregations that they should beat the gay out of their children, etc. We are conveyed as (and in many cases, sadly, ARE) bigots or closed-minded, unaccepting doucebags. I apologize for those Christians that give us this image, and I assure you that there are many more level-headed ones that are just generally nice people who shake their heads at the loud, rude ones. I will happily discuss any aspect of this type of conversation with you or anyone else via PM or another thread if you'd like. I assure you that I am not the -typical- Christian as thought of by many atheists. That being said, I think I've participated in derailing this thread enough.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
08-30-2012, 10:14 AM | #87 | |||||
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
However, the level of confidence is sufficiently high, and you can't pull the geocentricity card. Technically speaking, the earth and sun rotate around each other, but the center of gravity is just closer to the sun and in fact is INSIDE the sun, as its mass is comparatively huge. Arguing over whether I put peanut butter in your chocolate or you put chocolate in my peanut butter is not useful here. Something like evolution, for example, is fact. It's not something "we think we know" unless you are OK with me telling you that you only "think" you're in front of your computer right now and may not "actually" be. When you have independent bodies of abundant, consistent evidence that is explained and predicted by your theory, that theory becomes absurdly strong. So when we say "we know that humans evolved and how they evolved," we have a level of confidence about it that is just as strong as me telling you that the sun will set tonight or that a tennis ball will drop to the floor if you let it go. Either way, the strength of science is that it indeed changes. The requirement of falsification is built into the scientific method. With each new layer of understanding, untruth is whittled away, bringing us closer to truth and thus a more accurate depiction of reality. The theory of gravity itself is falsifiable too, as is every other theory, but falsifying it doesn't mean things are suddenly going to start floating up like you fukken broke the Matrix. It just means a better theory exists to explain the evidence. Replacing something like evolution or the explanation for how the Earth formed would be a ridiculously massive undertaking. We can look into space and literally see planets and stars and galaxies forming in all their different stages, and the sort of evidence we observe is consistent with what we see about the Earth, and so on. So yes, we do "know" these things with high levels of confidence. Quote:
Quote:
How do you tell apart which parts of the Bible are meant to be taken literally and which parts are allegorical/symbolic/etc? You're picking and choosing by implying that if the Bible gets something right with respect to science, it's meant to be taken literally, but if it's contradicted by science, it's just symbolic. It's a constant moving of the goalposts that way and people have been doing it for years. You see the same thing with morality. "Of course," almost nobody takes the Bible *fully* literally because such a moral view is incompatible with today's society. You can always go back through and pick out the good bits you like, but you have to ignore all the awful things. In the end, we don't get our morals from the Bible since we use a secular moral reasoning foundation to pick and choose in the first place! So it is embarrassing when you see people pointing to the Bible going, "Look, right here, homosexuality is an abomination!" but then when you turn to slavery, which it also condones? "Oh, we don't believe in that anymore" or "Well, clearly they meant slavery as a metaphor for being imprisoned in your own heart" or whatever. How do you distinguish literal truth from allegory? Do you think Homer's Odyssey is any different? How about Harry Potter? Quote:
“With or without [religion], you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion.” -Steven Weinberg This is especially lethal when people justify the killing of others based on unfalsifiable interpretations of religion that they've been indoctrinated with from youth. Quote:
Last edited by Reincarnate; 08-30-2012 at 11:25 AM.. |
|||||
08-30-2012, 11:18 AM | #88 | |
Digital Dancing!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 80 billion club, NE
Age: 31
Posts: 12,980
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
oh boy.. I was gonna refute some of those points, but I'd just be mirroring what rubix is gonna say, so *popcorn.gif*
EDIT: and there we have it. EDIT2: Quote:
__________________
Last edited by rushyrulz; 08-30-2012 at 11:32 AM.. |
|
08-30-2012, 12:45 PM | #89 | |
FFR Veteran
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
If the whole point of debate is to find out something interesting, read some books. For religious debates, read the Bible, Summa Theologica (St. Thomas Aquinas), and various other scriptures on philosophy and life, instead of posting about why your beliefs are superior to another. EDIT: Also, take some time to realize what started this particular argument...which is a ****ing facebook post by some no-name person who's only flaw (in the eyes of the OP at least, I wouldn't necessarily describe it as a flaw) was that the person is vocal about their faith. Think about that for a second. Last edited by A2P; 08-30-2012 at 12:52 PM.. |
|
08-30-2012, 01:06 PM | #90 | ||||
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
Quote:
For some reason people feel like there's some huge social cost to conceding points or acknowledging fault/being incorrect over something. Nothing to do with ego-boosting. People just get tired of seeing their country to go shit over things that aren't based in reasoned discussion or evidence. Quote:
2. It's not about superiority. It's about fairness and equality. Quote:
|
||||
08-30-2012, 01:11 PM | #91 | |
Offical Best Poster 2012
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 918
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
I don't see the point of ever arguing a point to anyone on the internet unless it's entertainment at the same time.
__________________
PARTY TIME IN TGB |
|
08-30-2012, 01:20 PM | #92 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 642
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
|
|
08-30-2012, 01:33 PM | #93 |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Please read up above re: literal interp. vs. allegory
|
08-30-2012, 01:45 PM | #94 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 642
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
oh i know, picking and choosing. not gonna argue that. thing is, the way i "pick and choose" is to not. i see the entire thing as symbolic, with exception to "he ate bread" lines, as i stated earlier.
strong chance moses was an intelligent, accomplished leader who wanted to keep his people in line. strong chance that if most christians are correct about God, then he's a dick, plain and simple. see my "started off serious but devolved into crap" thread. |
08-30-2012, 02:21 PM | #95 |
sunshine and rainbows
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 1,987
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
I just watched/listened to that for the first time a couple hours ago from clicking through my own youtube suggestions without having read this thread.
Also, when I was confirmed as a Catholic, I was given a book called Catechism of the Catholic Church and told by the old lady who sponsored me that back in the day, no one ever read or studied the Bible but the book that she gave me. And I found that being Catholic meant I wasn't viewed as a proper Christian by some christians. I guess the point I'm trying to make is that you can't just refute the Bible to get to christians who may not really believe the Bible much at all, and it ties into the other post I made in this thread, in that religion is fluid and what a religious group of people believe isn't going to be the same from one era or part of the world to another or from one sect to another. I don't get the whole 'don't want to be serious on the internet' thing that so many people have, unless it's purely a form of keeping themselves sane, which I don't think it is. I can't argue worth shit IRL; too many points to remember and to connect and to express properly, too many interruptions. Last edited by Cavernio; 08-30-2012 at 02:41 PM.. |
08-30-2012, 03:07 PM | #96 |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Actually I think science, in itself, is convincing enough on its own merits.
For me, back when I was a theist, the turning point was learning about how evolution worked. Once I understood how it worked, everything else (statistics, physics, logic, history, psychology, chemistry/biology, etc) followed suit and I realized why religion was just manmade myth. Last edited by Reincarnate; 08-30-2012 at 08:16 PM.. |
08-30-2012, 03:44 PM | #97 | |
The FFRchiver
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Age: 30
Posts: 2,168
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Quote:
Still blows my mind that 90% of the weight in a proton is the empty space where particles to jump in and out of existence; or that our existence is directly tied with the elements created and spread by the supernovas of countless stars.
__________________
|
|
08-30-2012, 04:02 PM | #98 |
sunshine and rainbows
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 1,987
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
Emotions trump logic. Every time. I only became atheist after my God relationship bliss disappeared, and only after a couple years of trying to find that feeling again to no avail. My views regarding science didn't change before or after the fact. I told myself all the time that God didn't make sense.
|
08-30-2012, 04:46 PM | #99 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 642
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
lol @ chof
religion is pretty much entirely bogus, imo. the idea of a god-like figure is not. i find it a bit humorous ya'll put so much "faith" in science. scientific results are drawn from our crummy little senses, and interpreted by our crummy little brains. it's the best we got, sure, but it's totes fallible. i ain't even sayin you're wrong, i'm just sayin check yo self. |
08-30-2012, 05:03 PM | #100 |
ごめんなさい (/ω\)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 28
Posts: 2,290
|
Re: Do you see anything wrong?
requesting skimmed version of this and moved into CT
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|