09-14-2008, 06:38 PM | #1 |
TWG Veteran
|
jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
jTWG LI: World War II; A Soldiers Tale
Striclty 12 players. I won't accpet any more, and if the people that sign up are usually inactive I won't let them play. Simple as that. The Wolves - Adolf Hitler (wolf saint) Benito Mussolini (wolf) Joseph Stalin (master wolf) The Blues - Franklin D. Roosevelt/ (Item Finder 1) Winston Churchill (Item finder 2) 7 Humans The special roles - Wolf Saint - When lynched, the first person to have voted for him/her will aslo die. Item Finder 1 - Chooses which item s/he would like the first night. They use it, and pass it along to another person. It is passed along each night, and never dies out. Item Finder 2 - Same Item Finder #1. The Items - (cannot be given to wolves) Zyklon B - vigi Tank - Guard Specs - seer 1. iluswirl (iluswirl) 2. hi top (flywheel1964) 3. freakysnots (freakysnots) 4. FrozenAngel91 (FrozenAngel991) 5. u84 (u8477) 6. Ruritsu (ruritsu) 7. JkPolk (jomfgwhich) 8. jump_the_bullet (aksmooth77) 9. ElRayford (ElRayford) 10. xharumoni (xharumoni) 11. robertsona (robertsonarofl) 12. Last edited by rzr; 09-15-2008 at 08:52 AM.. |
09-14-2008, 07:05 PM | #2 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Wait a ****ing minute. Why did Robert say to start, and ilu, when we only have 11?
|
09-14-2008, 07:17 PM | #3 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
What? I never dropped out..
|
09-14-2008, 07:18 PM | #4 |
FFR Player
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I think they were counting freaky as your twelfth.
|
09-14-2008, 07:29 PM | #5 |
missa in h-moll
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: nyc
Age: 28
Posts: 3,995
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
i said to start?
__________________
|
09-14-2008, 07:41 PM | #6 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Posted in your sign-up thread, too.
I'm still in for this game. Freaky signed up for my game already, too and I am struggling to get a few spots filled.. |
09-14-2008, 07:47 PM | #7 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Nobody said you dropped out. Go read the thread.
|
09-14-2008, 08:04 PM | #8 |
TWG Princess
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
If that doesn't mean you're trying to sub out u84, then you phrased that incredibly badly.
|
09-14-2008, 08:05 PM | #9 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I did read it. So, I'm still in. No need for a replacement here. If you still need someone to replace freaky, that's different (saying that to make sure you understand I need him for my game. New players are easier to come by. Not so much Vets..).
|
09-14-2008, 08:06 PM | #10 |
Clueless & Comfortable
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I never said start. If you look, I filled the 4th spot with curt, although he hasn't officially signed up, he said he's going to. I just need to get a hold of him.
|
09-14-2008, 08:10 PM | #11 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I find it incredibly funny when Mak has half the knowledge and makes accusations. Funny...
U84, I'm keeping Freaky. He signed up here first. Go find your own vets. I found Freaky -- He requested this game. And again, read the sign up thread. Or, ask Xception. I'm tired of repeating myself. Iluswirl... Well, I don't have anything to say but I'm letting you know I read your post, I'm not ignoring you. |
09-14-2008, 08:14 PM | #12 |
Clueless & Comfortable
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
It's fine.. I didn't really expect an answer.. I just wanted to let you know..
And I'm assuming that we can't edit posts because this *is* the game thread? |
09-14-2008, 08:15 PM | #13 | |
TWG Princess
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Quote:
Just looked to me like you were trying to sub out u84 based on how that was phrased. |
|
09-14-2008, 08:18 PM | #14 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Quote:
Two, TWG isn't supped to be a competition between TWG and jTWG. I need two more players at least as it is and taking out Freaky really ****s that up. As I said before, I am still in. So if your logic is you need someone who knows what they are doing, then once again, don't kick me out. I know he signed up for your's first, but I need him. Although, the decision isn't even your's or mine. We are going to have to comprimise something here or wait to get his response. I, too, am tired of repeating myself. And to Maki's defense, you did blatantly say you were looking for a sub for me. He doesn't need to know everything to tell that, so try not to jump on him after everything he says. |
|
09-14-2008, 08:25 PM | #15 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Naw, Mak, it's cool. Just check out my reasoning. You can find it in the sign up thread.
Kyle, you're just not getting it. It's coming to the point where you're actually annoying me. Ready? I-don't-want-you-in-here-because-you're-too-good. It-will-****-with-the-new-players. Did you get it that time? |
09-14-2008, 08:34 PM | #16 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Quote:
Also, if you use that logic, then freaky definitely can not play, being that he's more of a vet than you are. And while I'm posting, Hi-top isn't exactly bad either. He's learned the concept of this game pretty quick and would be just as good as I or anyone else. So drop it, accept that you have to let me in and I need freaky, or drop all of the players who have any inkling of an idea of how to play this game. |
|
09-14-2008, 09:00 PM | #17 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Ok, good sir, you're still failing to read what I've already said.
Xception says: Have a player who's good in there. It helps. Rzr says: U84's too good. Xception says: Freaky's a vet, too. Rzr says: Freaky is not as good as U84. Freaky's been playing longer. Which satisfies Xception's needs. Are you, like, able to get it now? I don't want you in here because more than half the players are new. You've proven you're good. What will happen is the new players won't even have a fighting chance. Freaky, on the other hand, isn't as good as you. He understands the syntax and can explain the game to new players and help them along. You will most likely manipulate them. We've seen you play dirty. Now, stop posting. Your pissing me off. If you still haven't gotten my point you're a complete moron who doesn't deserve to play. |
09-14-2008, 10:41 PM | #18 | ||
FFR Player
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I'm sorry I was going to sign up, but something unexpected came up today and I ended up not being able to. I'll make sure to do it next time though.
I'll read some more rules and look up more things and then I'll try and join the next game, again I'm sorry for that Ilu X_X Good luck to all in the game
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-14-2008, 11:01 PM | #19 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,921
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
Quote:
Anyways, manipulation is a main factor of this game, douchebag. I don't want to resort to names, but I'm starting to get pissed of as well. I see your point, but disagree that the new players won't have a fighting chance. For one, I haven't played as a wolf for more than a day phase and the only experience I have with being a human was in your one mystery game. Other than that, unless you are counting the countless times I "cheated," (even though it said nothing about it in the rules) I was only human one other time, where I was killed on Night 1. So, I say to you, no one knows ANYTHING about my skill level in this game and I have way too little experience to be proclaimed as good. Now, put me in the game, or the TWC will be notified. |
|
09-14-2008, 11:16 PM | #20 |
TWG Veteran
|
Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale
I'll notify the TWC myself. I don't want you to play.
Now, I have the right to deem how good you are. I'll break it down to the rubric of which I posted in the TWC thread: Contribution: [x] From what I've seen, when you play you contribute to your sides victory the most. I haven't yet granted you an MVP because you've played dirty, been withdrawn, or others have played better. However, you're very good at hunting down wolves to help the humans, therefore contributing to your team. Comprehension: [x] The game you formulated for your mystery game, though not as original as it could be, proves your comprehension of the game. Strategy: [x] Your strategies aren't exactly honorable, but are effective. You like to gain people's trust and get their role. It could make you look like a wolf, but doesn't seem to. Your strategy is very well for someone so new. So, Kyle, there you go. If you try to argue with me further the only point you can make is to prove you're a bad player. NOTE: Your post had a little improper grammar, too. Also, don't call me a doucebag. I didn't call you any names. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|