11-30-2012, 05:46 PM | #5201 |
Live a wonderful life~
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,313
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
I did. I was just playing along lmao
__________________
=============================== The idea that RDCP 3 may come out in the future is a fun thought to have~ =============================== |
11-30-2012, 08:47 PM | #5202 | |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
part of Ichliebekase's review for Dear Noriko:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Nullifidian; 11-30-2012 at 08:54 PM.. |
|
11-30-2012, 09:00 PM | #5203 |
Forum User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 29
Posts: 1,405
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
lol FFR
|
11-30-2012, 09:10 PM | #5204 | |
FFR Simfile Author
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,213
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
I still gave you a 7 anyway, it's not like it's that big of a deal. Honestly, the nasty comment wasn't necessary, and a PM would have sufficed.
__________________
Glorious Morning - Misc, level 48
We Will Fly - Dance 2, level 53 =.The Ocean.= - Dance 2, level 56, collab with krunkykai22 Garden Party - Dance, level 38 |
|
11-30-2012, 09:17 PM | #5205 |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Regardless of the 7 you gave me, the critique was unjust and showed a big lack of experience in my eyes. It was your main point of criticism in your review after all. Sorry if it offended you, but you'll live huehue
__________________
|
11-30-2012, 09:21 PM | #5206 |
Dan "Razor" Devilz
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clint, TX
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
how 2 layer 101
|
11-30-2012, 09:22 PM | #5207 |
<3 Jumpstream <3
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Subjectivemanias.
People judge as they feel fit hence why they are judges lol You don't see me going to Kommi and bitchin up a storm because he gave me a 2 lol Deal with it |
11-30-2012, 09:24 PM | #5208 |
FFR Simfile Author
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,213
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Either way, there was no need for rude comments. And again, a PM would have been fine. Also, there is no "main point" in my critique. It was just the first one because it came first in the song. The awkward patterns came later in the song, so it was written second. Get over yourself.
__________________
Glorious Morning - Misc, level 48
We Will Fly - Dance 2, level 53 =.The Ocean.= - Dance 2, level 56, collab with krunkykai22 Garden Party - Dance, level 38 |
11-30-2012, 09:24 PM | #5209 |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
that's because kommi knows what he's talking about
__________________
|
11-30-2012, 09:26 PM | #5210 |
<3 Jumpstream <3
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
So I get a 6,6,7 and the 2 from Kommi and he knows what he's talking about? LOL
Not to mention it was AlexDest, TC_Halogen AND JX .... SO apparently they have no idea what they're doing and were completely stupid in giving good ratings because why? rofl |
11-30-2012, 09:27 PM | #5211 |
Dan "Razor" Devilz
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clint, TX
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
maybe you got a 2 cause your file sucks l 0 l
|
11-30-2012, 09:28 PM | #5212 |
<3 Jumpstream <3
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Lol maybe, just maybe But why would the others give it 6+ :P
|
11-30-2012, 09:29 PM | #5213 |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
I never implied they don't know what they're doing.
__________________
|
11-30-2012, 09:30 PM | #5214 | |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,858
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it saying its a matter of consistency is stupid. im not sure what your definition of consistency is when in reference to stepping but my definition is file structure and execution remains similar throughout the entire file just because spitfire doesnt step using the same techniques you were taught does not make his file inconsistent. |
|
11-30-2012, 09:30 PM | #5215 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
|
11-30-2012, 09:31 PM | #5216 |
good hot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Age: 29
Posts: 5,309
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
waaah my file got rejected the judges suck its unfair
__________________
|
11-30-2012, 09:31 PM | #5217 |
<3 Jumpstream <3
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
|
11-30-2012, 09:33 PM | #5218 |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Different opinions are valid, as long as they're argumented properly.
__________________
|
11-30-2012, 09:36 PM | #5219 | |
<3 Jumpstream <3
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
Quote:
Kommisar: NRG (2/10) -Basically just a very repetitive jumpstream that cuts off abruptly. TC_Halogen: NRG (krunkykai22) Rating: 6/10 [+.] - incredibly generic song - pitch relevancy is alright but certainly could use reworking in the second half when both the melody and lower chords change - layering is acceptable - despite the short length, file drags quite a bit, as it's just one big 16th stream for a minute NRG (krunkykai22) - [+.] 6/10 - Ehhhh, the song choice is lackluster and it's repetitive. Your pitch relevancy is inconsistent so, I'm only going to point out a couple errors. - s3.47 should be an up arrow and s3.70 should be a right arrow. This error continues. - s14.78, should be the same jump from before (a [23]). This kind of pattern continues through-out. - The file should end with a 16th note. I'd suggest going over your pitch relevancy more discreetly. NRG (krunkykai22) 7/10 Not very good termination of the song (need better edition), and not very variable in the structure due to the song, but overall good PR/pattern choice and replayable short file. looking at those notes, tell me in what way his notes were argumented correctly? At least the other 3 gave proper mistakes to fix. How can I fix anything based upon what Kommi said? Last edited by krunkykai22; 11-30-2012 at 09:38 PM.. |
|
11-30-2012, 09:37 PM | #5220 |
Dan "Razor" Devilz
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clint, TX
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)
lmao.
"i think ur file is inconsistent because i wouldn't have stepped it in xxxx way, but dont worry i gave u a 7, its ok no big deal." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|