TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. - Page 3

pntballa18 · 12-5-2007, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rzr

@ xero: That's all fine and dandy, but then how would we judge inactivity?

we judge each case individually, I don't see why everyone has a problem with that. we're not gonna come up with a working rubric that will cover every situation

X3R0H0UR · 12-5-2007, 10:58 AM

With our humongous brains and extremely powerful egos.

rzr · 12-5-2007, 12:59 PM

rofl, ok, as long as it's not biased (sorry to poke holes in everything)

mattc16 · 12-5-2007, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travman301

Matt thats not the point of this. We absolutely don't want you to stop playing.

It's just that you have been inactive for a few games now, and we need some kind of standard for inactivity.

I hope you will come back after two games.

Trav, I know that's not the point. The point i'm trying to make is that the quality of game has decreased so much.

I stopped playing for about 10 games, can't remember which numbers i stopped/started on. The general intelligence levels of the game has gone down a lot, which has then lead to me being motivated to sign up for the game because I want to try and help people, but then when the game starts I get bored quite easily and then have no motivation to post, because i'm fearful I'll sound like a wolf if i try and post anything helpful!!

Then there is the other problem of time zones, as was mentioned by heavy (i think). It doesn't help me for AIM activity if I'm 5-7 hours ahead of you guys (I'm in the UK), as when i can get online, noone else is!

**DarkManticoreX2** · 12-8-2007, 08:06 AM

I would like the three unbiased members of the TWC to take a look at the current TWG game and tell BDN if I did anything wrong.

Makilaz and I cannot be parts of the desicion because we are too close to the situation.

It's my thought that Both games are human victories, and BDN only cancelled the games because they were over.

pntballa18 · 12-8-2007, 09:20 AM

if i'm considered unbiased, which i doubt i am, i'm voting with manti that both games were fair human wins

**Makilaz** · 12-8-2007, 11:11 AM

I'm probably too biased for the 2nd one, but if not, I'm voting human victory for the first, draw for the second, since Manti did break the rules by selling out the wolves after conversion.

pntballa18 · 12-8-2007, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makilaz

I'm probably too biased for the 2nd one, but if not, I'm voting human victory for the first, draw for the second, since Manti did break the rules by selling out the wolves after conversion.

no, he didn't. He was feeding me the convo through vent the whole time. Even if he wasn't, he wasn't sent a confirmation PM (at that point, atleast) saying that he was now a wolf. This means that you could have just as easily been bluffing. So even if you don't believe he wasnt feeding me the convo, you're still wrong.

this shouldnt even be in the voting process.

heavylee · 12-8-2007, 05:12 PM

I vote we make new rules which are concurrent with the level of play at the moment. There need to be some clear cut rules. AKA:

1. No talking face to face in real life
2. No flaming
3. No sharing game info or talking with the dead about TWG
4. No swearing

haha just had to throw #4 in there. But ya, I don't think people have actually read the rules. If there were a newer set up, I think they would be more inclined to read them.

edubardus · 12-8-2007, 05:26 PM

I disagree with the new rules idea. All of them. Rules are implemented at the start of each game. Limiting people of emotions and expressions only hinders the game. Swearing and flaming show emotions. Emotions play an important part of TWG. Censoring never does any good.

Talking to the dead is fine if no resurrections are in game and if players aren't retarded. Not condoned, but not illegal if people know what they're doing.

**freakysnots** · 12-8-2007, 06:16 PM

y teh fuck can not we swear

**Makilaz** · 12-8-2007, 06:40 PM

No new overall rules. The host can decide what the ground rules are, and yes, swearing is allowed. There's a profanity filter for a reason.

heavylee · 12-8-2007, 07:09 PM

haha guys, the swearing one was a joke. Calm down! :P I don't know I just think some people are going beyond what they should be allowed to do in this game. Who knows though, maybe it is adapting into a whole new kind of game than what I am used to.

rzr · 12-19-2007, 11:31 AM

Sorry to bump but I must say that if the demand of TWG increases anymore I think we should add a new level. Like jTWG and TWG next we should have a jjTWG (junior x2) or something. Becasue the new jTWG players are easily good enough to play in TWG it's just there is no more room these days ><

**travman301** · 12-19-2007, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rzr

Sorry to bump but I must say that if the demand of TWG increases anymore I think we should add a new level. Like jTWG and TWG next we should have a jjTWG (junior x2) or something. Becasue the new jTWG players are easily good enough to play in TWG it's just there is no more room these days ><

Really bad idea IMO.

**Makilaz** · 12-19-2007, 03:36 PM

jTWG and TWG are enough levels as it is. Adding more will just make the system needlessly complicated.

rzr · 12-19-2007, 05:01 PM

But what do we do if the game becomes so popularly demanded that both sections are filled?

**DarkManticoreX2** · 12-19-2007, 05:07 PM

There was a thought about adding an i(ntermediate)TWG a while back but it was shot down.

I don't really think we should add another level of TWG. What should happen, is we should set the times for player signups again. In this way, All the people that really want in the game and have an intention of playing know when to sign on to sign up.

I don't see any point of adding another level of TWG anyway when we still have inactives in the current format. If every single player was active in both the TWG and jTWG games, and other people still wanted in, I could see it happening, but not untill then.

rzr · 12-19-2007, 05:11 PM

Ok, sounds better. Also @ all vets: Sorry if I'm trying to hard to be involved in what goes on. It's good stuff, TWG.

pntballa18 · 12-19-2007, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkManticoreX2

What should happen, is we should set the times for player signups again.

wow thank goodness someone came up with that idea

12-5-2007, 10:58 AM	#42
X3R0H0UR FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2007 Age: 39 Posts: 540	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. With our humongous brains and extremely powerful egos. __________________ Gynecologist, Saturday nights only.

12-8-2007, 09:20 AM	#46
pntballa18 FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hossin Age: 32 Posts: 3,357	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. if i'm considered unbiased, which i doubt i am, i'm voting with manti that both games were fair human wins __________________

12-8-2007, 11:11 AM	#47
Makilaz TWG Princess Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bristol, UK Age: 34 Posts: 1,094	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. I'm probably too biased for the 2nd one, but if not, I'm voting human victory for the first, draw for the second, since Manti did break the rules by selling out the wolves after conversion. __________________

12-8-2007, 05:12 PM	#49
heavylee FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 961	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. I vote we make new rules which are concurrent with the level of play at the moment. There need to be some clear cut rules. AKA: 1. No talking face to face in real life 2. No flaming 3. No sharing game info or talking with the dead about TWG 4. No swearing haha just had to throw #4 in there. But ya, I don't think people have actually read the rules. If there were a newer set up, I think they would be more inclined to read them.

12-8-2007, 05:26 PM	#50
edubardus RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGEEEEEEE Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Scarlet Devil Mansion Age: 35 Posts: 797	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. I disagree with the new rules idea. All of them. Rules are implemented at the start of each game. Limiting people of emotions and expressions only hinders the game. Swearing and flaming show emotions. Emotions play an important part of TWG. Censoring never does any good. Talking to the dead is fine if no resurrections are in game and if players aren't retarded. Not condoned, but not illegal if people know what they're doing. __________________ Last edited by bluguerrilla : Today at 08:51 PM. Reason: edubardus/

12-8-2007, 06:16 PM	#51
freakysnots 八一 Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Xinjiang, PRC Age: 31 Posts: 2,904	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. y teh fuck can not we swear

12-8-2007, 06:40 PM	#52
Makilaz TWG Princess Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bristol, UK Age: 34 Posts: 1,094	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. No new overall rules. The host can decide what the ground rules are, and yes, swearing is allowed. There's a profanity filter for a reason. __________________

12-8-2007, 07:09 PM	#53
heavylee FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 961	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. haha guys, the swearing one was a joke. Calm down! :P I don't know I just think some people are going beyond what they should be allowed to do in this game. Who knows though, maybe it is adapting into a whole new kind of game than what I am used to.

12-19-2007, 03:36 PM	#56
Makilaz TWG Princess Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bristol, UK Age: 34 Posts: 1,094	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. jTWG and TWG are enough levels as it is. Adding more will just make the system needlessly complicated. __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)