06-4-2013, 08:13 PM | #6301 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
Quote:
I didn't check who stepped what until I was finished with my notes, totally didn't know that bmah stepped this. Whoops.
__________________
|
|
06-5-2013, 01:30 AM | #6303 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
rofl
|
06-5-2013, 01:34 AM | #6304 |
Anime Avatars ( ◜◡^)っ✂╰⋃╯
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Squat Rack
Age: 34
Posts: 10,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
lmao did you step Szycag
|
06-5-2013, 01:35 AM | #6305 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
middles got banned
why is this
__________________
Last edited by Choofers; 06-5-2013 at 01:43 AM.. |
06-5-2013, 01:44 AM | #6306 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
Not to derail the thread, but do you want the reasoning I was given or my take on it?
They're pretty different so I feel the need to ask. PS: So does that mean N's Farewell and MFDFY can get rereviews for "poor quality" notes from both Dossar and Aj respectively? |
06-5-2013, 01:46 AM | #6307 |
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,652
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
saskrotch, for everlasting peace pt 1-3
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 01:48 AM | #6308 | ||
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
AJ gave you reasons why your file received the score it did, and those reasons were consistent with the score. Same with Dossar.
AJ's file got rejudged because a 1/10 isn't consistent with Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
06-5-2013, 01:52 AM | #6309 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
If that's the best judges like them have to offer for explanations, we're in for . (Note: I have purposely left that blank. that is not a typo.) Those aren't notes, those are comments that if I described them, I'd get another infraction or w/e and to be frank, it's not worth arguing here anymore.
|
06-5-2013, 01:56 AM | #6310 |
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,652
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
a lot of your other files got around 5~6 scores from some of the judges so i would say the 5 isn't too far off, probably a harsh judgement still but it still makes some sense, it's not like "wow this song is shit 1/10" or "lol lawn wake 3 here's a 2/10"
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 02:12 AM | #6311 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
Quote:
I think their judgement is of a lot higher merit than: In comparison, Dossar's notes just aren't acceptable. They aren't specific and every comment he makes is highly subjective. There's nothing of value to anyone in there. Not a single note he made helped in the changes I made this afternoon. In fact, when notes are posted, I copy paste them all into a notepad doc and go through them. His are completely absent. On purpose. I'd have gladly taken a 5 with the other set of notes, no problem. These, not a chance. But yeah like I said, this will go ignored, I'll just be silenced again illogically, and the day will continue. Good luck to everyone in the upcoming batches. I just wanna get through this queue I have so I can finally step something new and not have it rot in a folder because of - comment withheld - . |
|
06-5-2013, 02:14 AM | #6312 | |
Spun a twirly fruitcake,
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 31
Posts: 3,865
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
dat stepman bias
__________________
Quote:
|
|
06-5-2013, 02:26 AM | #6313 |
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,652
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
[Resubmission] N's Farewell – 5/10
- For an easier file of this difficulty the hands should go. I’m not enforcing a Tass-era type hand policy here or anything but this is a calm piano song that would be better stepped gracefully than with heavy layering. - Make the two-note gallops a jump. This is an easier file and gallops are annoying when a player of this level should be learning proper rhythms first. It also covers the gallop anyways so it’s a plus. - Rather than have a long 8th stream I would suggest following the prominent melody. - I can picture a great easier file for this song. But in its current state, it feels like a long 8th stream with forced layering to a calm song. I would suggest getting rid of the grace notes. first part mentions hands & layering - this points out to a problem with heavy layering of sounds that might not necessarily be needed in the form of unnecessary hands, so this might be -1 points or something 2nd part mentions two-note gallops which addresses potential pattern & difficulty issues, this is prob minor 3rd part mentions a fundamental problem with the file that is probably not in a specific spot - long 8th streams instead of following the prominent melody, this could be something big like -2 pts 4th part mentions grace notes & again, pattern problems this is still probably a harsh judgement but i can see where the points are being taken off, it's still not "oh it's 8th stream and i don't like that -6 points" l0le sometimes you get harsh judges and sometimes you don't, also keep in mind that scores are average also 2 of your files are in resubs so why are you even asking for a rejudge ??????????? just fix said problems and you'll probably improve your files and get it in would you rather have your file go into game in unfixed state or would you rather fix it up more??? remember, you're stepping so people can play your files, not so you can brag about how many files u have in game l0leeeee
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 02:29 AM | #6314 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
Quote:
Last edited by Xx{Midnight}xX; 06-5-2013 at 02:32 AM.. |
|
06-5-2013, 02:32 AM | #6315 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
if you really have an issue with it there are two things you can do (since you're definitely not gonna get your files rejudged)
one: you can not fix anything, resubmit next batch, and hope you don't get the same judges OR two: you can fix your files and resubmit next batch, with an improved file that will ultimately increase your chances of getting another file in game
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 02:39 AM | #6316 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 8,548
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
Quote:
And two, that's really the only option. I know I won't get them rejudged but I'm still annoyed to all hell I got denied for some of the worst reasoning I've seen typed into the forums. Just I am only voicing anything just to throw it out that stuff like what got pulled is nonsense. I was hoping someone would at least say they understand my point, but that's just not what happened I guess. Point is some changes need to be made so that **** notes aren't allowed to spur out. Last edited by Xx{Midnight}xX; 06-5-2013 at 02:41 AM.. |
|
06-5-2013, 03:02 AM | #6317 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
The fact that you're making a huge deal out of a slightly lower score is nonsense.
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 03:19 AM | #6318 | |
Spun a twirly fruitcake,
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 31
Posts: 3,865
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
I think I've seen a bit of the N's Farewell's history.
Every time he sends it, he gets suggestions for fixes. He fixes them, sends it again, gets suggestions for fixes with things he just fixed the other way round. I can understand that it gets frustrating to get sent from pillar to post.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by SKG_Scintill; 06-6-2013 at 04:54 AM.. |
|
06-5-2013, 04:11 AM | #6319 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,858
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
I'm going to step n's farewell
__________________
|
06-5-2013, 04:18 AM | #6320 | |
Spun a twirly fruitcake,
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 31
Posts: 3,865
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)
k kewl
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|