Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows movie Part 1

[awein999]

What did you think? I loved it. The slower than usual pace of movies these days was a great surprised for me. I think it paid a great tribute to the first half of the book and it was actually very well made. My favorite Harry Potter movie by far. Not going to spoil anything for those of you that haven't seen it yet

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Lame sauce.

[smartdude1212]

I agree, it was phenomenal to sit back and think, "I don't have to worry about missing out on a ****-tonne of events." The acting was spot on, the cinematography was brilliant, and if it's any indication of part II, I'm wagering on a full-blown mind**** in eight months.

To me, it's the best one yet.

[duddychuck@yahoo.com]

I loved it. I camped out at the movies from 6am on Thursday until it started (: I didn't like the ending though, I guess I'm just bitter cause it was a cliff hanger and I have to wait forever to watch what happens after that part ):

[Izzy]

Is this part of the harry potter series? What is with the "part 1" thing?

[EnR]

Originally Posted by Izzy

Is this part of the harry potter series? What is with the "part 1" thing?

There's 2 more movies, this one and Part 2 of this one.

[Bill Kaulitz]

I camped out as well. From 2 pm to 12 am. I needed to see this movie. It was entertaining, and a couple of funny parts. They really tried to get everything in there...maybe that's why there's two parts. Can't wait for the second part.

[awein999]

quote of the movie "10 inches, nothing to brag about" -Ron

[FuzenAkuma]

Originally Posted by awein999

quote of the movie "10 inches, nothing to brag about" -Ron

nothing special*

[awein999]

your right. I thought I remembered it off the top of my head

[ic0slay3r]

the movie was really cool, I liked it. But i felt like it went really fast in some parts, still I think it was very well made they skipped some really minor thinks but that doesn't matter.

I also hate I have to wait until June to see the next half.

[UnkownMan]

From what I've heard, the movie was outstanding. I have yet to see it, but, from what I've seen, it will be worth my buy.

I envy those whove seen it already. /sarcasm

[Rubin0]

It was by far my favorite movie in the series. I've really only gone to see all the other movies because I loved the books, but never really the movies.

[Netjet!]

I quite enjoyed the movie, as many of you have. Can't wait for the second part though; the ending was about the biggest cliffhanger you could get (although I've read the book).

[duddychuck@yahoo.com]

Originally Posted by Bill Kaulitz

They really tried to get everything in there...maybe that's why there's two parts. Can't wait for the second part.

Its all about the money. They basically double the money they would get if they made one whole part cause people are still willing to camp out (Like you and I did xD) and they are still pretty up there on the box office, that x2=1 movie, smart.

[smartdude1212]

It's also a good idea in terms of producing the movie. After all, with two movies there are two budgets.

[awein999]

I actually think it's better this way. The movie actually seemed to fit the book for once because it's spread out into 5 hours to cover all the plot. It moved at a pace that made sense. And it's better for their "finances" as well. Everyone wins (well not really lol)

[duddychuck@yahoo.com]

Now here's the question. Would you rather have had them combine the parts and have a 6 hour epic movie? or keep it with the 2 parts

[smartdude1212]

That's a question for my bladder.

[awein999]

I'd personally rather it be a 6 hour epicly long movie but I can see the problems posed with that. But I'm a hardcore Harry Potter fan, for me personally it would be awesome. In fact I'll probably watch part 1 and part 2 back to back like it's one movie in the future anyway.