Rules on aim/skype/outside chat logs in-game

[dAnceguy117]

Originally Posted by FictionJunction

because fuck you I'm not going to be incriminated because I may not have something you want

cool if we lynch you every game?

it's not cool. it's really not. but I absolutely do not see the paradigm shifting enough to where wolves (or humans) can say NO, I AINT GIVING YOU JACK SHIT and not get lynched for it.

hopefully I'm wrong? but, just from the way I see it personally, a rule change makes more sense here.

[FictionJunction]

if you can think that far ahead then why would you lynch me to begin with?
because I broke the rules? that sounds petty.

[FictionJunction]

like, I literally MAY NOT HAVE IT so you're going to kill me because I actually don't have a log? Oh, sounds like you're killing me not because I'm a wolf but because I'm not following through your rule. The two don't correlate ever.

[dAnceguy117]

Originally Posted by FictionJunction

like, I literally MAY NOT HAVE IT so you're going to kill me because I actually don't have a log? Oh, sounds like you're killing me not because I'm a wolf but because I'm not following through your rule. The two don't correlate ever.

yes, I'm going to kill you because you actually don't have a log. I will be wrong sometimes but right pretty damn often. my lynches will be very accurate and I won't put any thought into the game, but I'll win as town far more often than I'll lose.

:/

sounds so lame, but that's just the way I see it.

I'll stop posting in this thread because I've already stated my opinion. I'm definitely down to discuss this more on AIM/skype/mumble/whatever anytime.

[FictionJunction]

Originally Posted by dAnceguy117

yes, I'm going to kill you because you actually don't have a log. I will be wrong sometimes but right pretty damn often.

that's fine. you'll eventually get tired of it.

[freakysnots]

faking convos goes a long way in trying to be human.

[dAnceguy117]

but should that be necessary?

[Xiz]

Originally Posted by freakysnots

faking convos goes a long way in trying to be human.

Originally Posted by dAnceguy117

but should that be necessary?

I've done it before. Works really well.

[dAnceguy117]

it's POSSIBLE and it can be done EFFECTIVELY but should it be NECESSARY?

really i guess what im saying is i like thread only games a lot. and skype mic-calls / mumble are cool cant really log those. logs....................

this could have been a fun thing....................

[FictionJunction]

you do what you need to do, no point in building walls. If someone parries your lunge you should be able to riposte

[Netjet!]

Originally Posted by FictionJunction

If someone parries your lunge you should be able to riposte

i like this analogy

[Krauthammer]

Faking logs is something I often do, although "faking" isn't the right word.

More like holding real conversations with wolf partners, as if we were just two players talking.

But yeah, I think that this should be narrowed down to "post screenshots of logs", or similar. Anything about logs that goes beyond mere text copy-paste should be forbidden.

[Charu]

I'm actually fine with not forbidding screenshot convo's.

That was something I should've thought of when Netjet died, and especially when I saw logs being collected, but I didn't act on it because I didn't think someone would actually ask for a screenshot.

While it's a cheap way to win, if you successfully fake a screenshot and a convo, it'll do the exact opposite of losing. It'll actually make you more likely to be human.

Just my thoughts on it.

Still mad at myself.

[FictionJunction]

Originally Posted by Netjet!

i like this analogy

although I did have it wrong.

You riposte after you parry.

So basically, if someone lunges at you you should be able to parry and riposte. An AIM screenshot isn't the END ALL BE ALL of human strategy that wins every time. That is a lie and your complacency only allows it to exist. But banning it isn't a solution. It's a limitation. Why are humans complaining about catching wolves???

[thesunfan]

because not all of us have the football coach ideology of "WINNING IS THE ONLY THING." Some of us want to see a good game.

[Krauthammer]

thesunfan has a point there, to be honest.

I'll point that requesting screenshots of the logs is...yeah, kinda a cheap move.

I'd support a re-roll of the game.

[Xiz]

First time I have done this, but hey, sorry. I agree, i'm cool with a re-roll or whatnot. Also forbidding things like this in the future.

It was cheap, sorry lol.

[dAnceguy117]

Originally Posted by Krauthammer

I'd support a re-roll of the game.

nahh I totally disagree haha. this game was won according to this game's rules.

I am personally in favor of altering those rules for future games, though.

[thesunfan]

basically what pete said.

[Charu]

Yeah, re-rolling now would pretty much make everything that has happened be null and moot, and it'll be back to square 1.

Edit: Oh, or did you mean re-roll the concept of the game and start from scratch with previous players?